Francesco Petrarca: a work, a novel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2392-0718.11.07Keywords:
Petrarca, text, novel, archetype, systemAbstract
This article aims to propose the need to approach Francesco Petrarca's Opera Omnia as a single text, fragmented into different individual works. I will demonstrate that its unity is not in extratextual, historical or biographical elements, but in the same poetic form, since the coherence that governs the structure is above all artistic. Moreover, such a form has to be read and considered as a novel. To define this text and justify the proposed choice, I will resort to the teaching of some renowned theorists and critics of contemporary literature because it is the poet himself who allows to refer to his work from an ever-new present. If it is true that Petrarca is a classical author, since he places himself in that rhetorical and poetic tradition, from there he addresses not only his contemporaries, but also ad posteros, which makes it possible to consider him ancient as well as contemporary, and as such it is possible to analyze him. In addition, if it is true that a classic is an author whose work never finishes saying what it has to say, the passage of time cannot be a penalty, but a resource with which his word lives in a constant present and that is why it is possible to read under a current hermeneutic lens.
References
ARIANI, M. (2021). Petrarca. Roma: Salerno.
BARTHES, R. (1997). Barthes por Barthes. Caracas: Monte Ávila Editores Latinoamericana.
BETTARINI, R. (2005). Introduzione. In Petrarca, F., Canzoniere. Torino: Einaudi.
BOSCO, U. (1968). Francesco Petrarca. Bari: Laterza.
CALVINO, I. (1994). Por qué leer los clásicos. México, D.F.: Tusquets.
CASADEI, A. (2018). Biologia della letteratura. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
CORTI, M. (1976). Principi della comunicazione letteraria. Milano: Bompiani.
DELEUZE, G. (2005). La isla desierta. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
DOODY, M. (1997). The true story of the novel. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.
EAGLETON, T. (2013). El acontecimiento de la literatura. Barcelona: Ediciones Península.
FEDI, R. (1975). Francesco Petrarca. Firenze: La Nuova Italia editrice.
LOTMAN, Y. (1982). La estructura del texto artístico. Madrid: Ediciones Istmo.
MORANTE, E. (1987). Pro o contro la bomba atomica. Milano: Adelphi.
MUKAROVSKY, J. (1977). Escritos de estética y semiótica del arte. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili.
POMILIO, M. (2016). Petrarca e l’idea di poesia. Roma: Edizioni Studium.
QUAGLIO, A. E. (1967). Francesco Petrarca. Milano: Garzanti.
RICO, F. (1967). Petrarca o de las perplejidades de la crítica. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos, n. 172.
RICO, F. (1976). «Rime sparse», «Rerum vulgarium fragmenta». Para el título y el primer soneto del «Canzoniere». Medioevo Romanzo, III, pp. 101-138.
RICO, F. (2003). Il nucleo della Posteritati (e le autobiografie di Petrarca). In BERRA, C. (ed.), Motivi e forme delle «Familiari» di Francesco Petrarca. VII Convegno di studi di Lingua e letteratura italiana. Gargnano del Garda, 2-5 ottobre 2002. Milano: «Cisalpino» Istituto Editoriale Universitario-Università degli Studi di Milano-Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia (Quaderni di Acme, 57).
RICOEUR, P. (2002). Del texto a la acción. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
SANTAGATA, M. (2011). Introduzione. In PETRARCA, F., Canzoniere. Milano: Mondadori.
SAPEGNO, N. (1955). Il Trecento. Milano: Vallardi.
SEGRE, C. (1985). Principios de análisis del texto literario. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.
TONELLI, N. (2017). Leggere il Canzoniere. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

