Gry jako moralne laboratorium. Gamifikacja dylematów moralnych bezzałogowych samochodów

Bartosz Maćkiewicz; Wojciech Mamak

doi:10.18778/2391-8551.05.01

Authors

Bartosz Maćkiewicz Uniwersytet Warszawski
Wojciech Mamak Uniwersytet Warszawski

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.05.01

Keywords:

gamification, moral intuitions, testability, algorythmisation, autonomous vehicles, information ethics

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify potential dangers and benefits of investigating moral intuitions about the autonomous vehicles (AVs), using gamified research tools. We argue that computer games facilitate constructing more ecologically valid experiments. Due to the increased validity, the experimental outcomes can represent the real-life mechanisms of decision-making more faithfully. Data extracted in this manner could be used in implementation of ‘moral modules’ in AVs built in the real world. In our paper we analyze selected experimental setups that use game-like elements and assess them in the light of current literature regarding the algorithmization of ethics and implementability of ethical frameworks in machines. We also show how this problem can be interpreted in an overarching conceptual scheme of Floridi’s ‘information ethics’.

Author Biographies

Bartosz Maćkiewicz, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bartosz Maćkiewicz (ur. 1992; b.mackiewicz@uw.edu.pl) – filozof, prawnik. Doktorant w Zakładzie Epistemologii UW, absolwent MISH i WPiA UW. Specjalizuje się w filozofii eksperymentalnej, filozofii nauki i zastosowaniu metod komputerowych w filozofii i prawie. Redaktor naukowy „Filozofii Nauki”.
Wojciech Mamak, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Wojciech Mamak (ur. 1992) – filozof i historyk nauki, absolwent MISH UW. Zajmuje się kognitywistyką, historią i filozofią nauki oraz epistemologią historyczną. Przygotowuje książkę dotyczącą rozwoju metod obliczeniowych i ich wpływu na zmiany ideałów racjonalności w Polsce w XIX i XX w.

References

Alexander, L., Moore, M. (2016). Deontological Ethics. W: E.N. Zalta (red.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016).

Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A.C., Swinth, K.R., Hoyt, C.L., & Bailenson, J.N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2): 103–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01

Bonnefon, J.F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293): 1573–1576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654

Bobrowski, M., Rodzińska-Szary, P., Socha, M. (2015). Kondycja polskiej branży gier wideo. Raport 2015. Dostępny online: http://kreatywna-europa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Raport-na-temat-kondycji-polskiej-bran%C5%BCy-gierwideo-1–1.pdf [data dostępu: 16.08.2017].

Cushman, F. (2013). Action, outcome, and value a dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17: 273–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313495594

DeSimone, J.A., Harms, P.D., & DeSimone, A.J. (2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2): 171–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962

ESA - Entertainment Software Association (2016). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Dostępny online: http://essentialfacts.theesa.com/mobile/ [data dostępu: 16.08.2017].

Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001

Frey, A., Hartig, J., Ketzel, A., Zinkernagel, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). The use of virtual environments based on a modification of the computer game Quake III Arena® in psychological experimenting. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4): 2026–2039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.010

Gitelman, L. (red.). (2013). Raw data is an oxymoron. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001

Greene, J.D., Nystrom, L.E., Engell, A.D., Darley, J.M., and Cohen, J.D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44: 389–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027

Huebner, B., Lee, J.J., & Hauser, M.D. (2010). The moral-conventional distinction in mature moral competence. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(1): 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853710X497149

Hursthouse, R., Pettigrove, G. (2016). Virtue Ethics. W: E.N. Zalta (red.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2016).

Illari, P., & Russo, F. (2014). Causality: Philosophical theory meets scientific practice. OUP Oxford.

Järvelä, S., Ekman, I., Kivikangas, J.M., & Ravaja, N. (2012). Digital games as experiment stimulus. Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic, s. 6–8.

Johansson, R., & Nilsson, J. (2016). Disarming the trolley problem – why self-driving cars do not need to choose whom to kill. W: Workshop CARS 2016 – Critical Automotive Applications: Robustness and Safety, red. M. Roy (Goteborg). Dostępny online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01375606/file/CARS2016_paper_16.pdf [data dostępu: 16.08.2017].

Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2008). Are some lives more valuable? An ethical preferences approach. Journal of health economics, 27(3): 739–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.10.001

Kivikangas, J.M., Chanel, G., Cowley, B., Ekman, I., Salminen, M., Järvelä, S., & Ravaja, N. (2011). A review of the use of psychophysiological methods in game research. Journal of gaming & virtual worlds, 3(3): 181–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.3.3.181_1

Miller, B., & Record, I. (2013). Justified belief in a digital age: On the epistemic implications of secret Internet technologies. Episteme, 10(2): 117–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2013.11

Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

NHTSA (2013). Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. Dostępny online: https://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated_Vehicles_Policy.pdf [data dostępu: 16.08.2017].

Paxton, J.M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J.D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36: 163–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x

Sicart, M. (2009). The banality of simulated evil: designing ethical gameplay. Ethics and information technology, 11(3): 191–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9199-5

Sicart, M. (2013). Moral dilemmas in computer games. Design Issues, 29(3): 28–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00219

Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Consequentialism. W: E.N. Zalta (red.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2015).

Sütfeld, L.R., Gast, R., König, P., & Pipa, G. (2017). Using virtual reality to assess ethical decisions in road traffic scenarios: applicability of value-of-life-based models and influences of time pressure. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00122

Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2008). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001

Washburn, D.A. (2003). The games psychologists play (and the data they provide). Behavior Research Methods, 35(2): 185–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202541

Bethesda Game Studios (2008). Fallout 3 [PC]. USA: Bethesda Softworks.

BioWare (1998). Baldur’s Gate [PC]. USA: Interplay Entertainment.

BioWare (2000). Baldur’s Gate II: Shadows of Amn [PC]. USA: Interplay Entertainment.

CCP Games (2003). Eve Online [PC Computer, Online Game]. CCP Games: played 12 September 2011.

Lionhead Studios (2004). Fable [PC]. Wielka Brytania: Microsoft Game Studios.

Media Molecule (2008). LittleBigPlanet [PS3]. USA: Sony Computer Entertainment.

Mojang (2011). Minecraft [PC]. USA: Mojang.

Telltale Games (2012). The Walking Dead [PC]. USA: Telltale Games.

Valve Corporation, 1999 (mod) / 2000 (wersja pudełkowa), Counter-Strike [PC], USA: Vivendi.