The problem of Irish Easter Uprising in the British House of Commons’ Forum

Authors

  • Antonina Pawłowska Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filozoficzno-Historyczny, Instytut Historii, Katedra Historii Powszechnej Najnowszej

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6050.96.10

Keywords:

Easter Rising, Ireland, Great Britain, 1916, House of Commons’ debates

Abstract

The article analyzes issues discussed during debates on the subject of the Easter Rising in Ireland of 1916 in the British House of Commons’ Forum. In the course of debates the subject of British administration’s responsibility for the outbreak of rebellion was widely disputed. Conclusions on the subject were included in the Rapport of the Royal Commission on the Rebellion in Ireland. There were also debates concerning issue of legal responsibility of the rebels, the means of judging them, and the legal basis of their trials. Among the vital issues discussed the question about general John Maxwell’s scope of authority and the validity of the martial law introduced in Ireland were found. Way of treatment of the Irish rebels by the British army and international overtone of the events were analyzed. The subject of changing public mood after the suppression of the Rising and possible repercussions from this situation were followed by a heated discussion. The analysis of the mentioned issues was based on transcripts of House of Commons’ debates and the Rapport of the Royal Commission on the Rebellion in Ireland.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Margot Asquith’s Great War Diary 1914–1916: The View from Downing Street, ed. B. Michael, Oxford 2014.
Google Scholar

Bachrynowski S., Od konfrontacji do koncyliacji: historia irlandzkiej partii Sinn Féin, Kalisz 2010.
Google Scholar

Bacon B., A Terrible Duty: the Madness of Captain Bowen-Colthurst, London 2015.
Google Scholar

Caulfield M., The Easter Rebellion: The outstanding narrative history of the 1916 Rising in Ireland, Dublin 2014.
Google Scholar

Knott G.H., The Trial of Sir Roger Casement, Toronto 1917.
Google Scholar

Kucharski A., Historia Irlandii w źródłach, Brzezia Łąka 2013.
Google Scholar

McGarry F., Rebels: Voices From The Easter Rising, Dublin 2011.
Google Scholar

O’Broin L., Dublin Castle and the 1916 Rising, London 1966.
Google Scholar

Swoboda G., Dublin 1916, Warszawa 2006.
Google Scholar

Townshend Ch., Easter 1916: The Irish Rebellion, Dublin 2011.
Google Scholar

Woodward D.R., Lloyd George and the Generals, London 1998.
Google Scholar

II konwencja haska z 29 lipca 1989 r., http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague02.asp (dostęp: 31 V 2016 r.).
Google Scholar

Raport Królewskiej Komisji do spraw Irlandzkiej Rebelii, http://www.garda.ie/Documents/User/Royal%20Commission%20on%20the%20Rebellion%20in%20Ireland%201916.pdf (dostęp: 31 V 2016 r.).
Google Scholar

Raport w sprawie aresztowania i traktowania panów: Francisa Sheehy Skeffingtoan, Thomasa Dicksona i Patricka Jamesa McIntyre, http://www.dippam.ac.uk/eppi/documents/22375/eppi_pages/630312 (dostęp: 31 V 2016 r.).
Google Scholar

Stenogramy posiedzeń Izby Gmin Parlamentu Brytyjskiego z 1916 r., http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/sittings/1916/may/ (dostęp: 31 V 2016 r.).
Google Scholar

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Pawłowska, A. (2016). The problem of Irish Easter Uprising in the British House of Commons’ Forum. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Historica, (96), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6050.96.10