Zur Dynamik der Sprache aus linguistischer und neurokognitiver Perspektive

Krzysztof Sakowski

doi:10.18778/1427-9665.10.04

Authors

Krzysztof Sakowski Universität Łódź, Philologische Fakultät, Lehrstuhl für Deutscheund Angewandte Sprachwissenschaft, 90-236 Łódź, Pomorska 171/173

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9665.10.04

Keywords:

cognitivism, dynamic approach , embodiment

Abstract

Cognitive sciences are grouped together according to their substantial disciplines such as neurobiology, psychology, linguistics and many others. From more than ten years a search has been undertaken for the best fitting cognitive research method, that does not influence the scientific output. More recently attention has been turned to systems which might operate through their dynamic aspect, called the dynamic approach. Their great advantage is to see the old linguistic axioms such as connectivity in a new way.

References

Atkinson D. (2011), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, London, New York.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830932

Basar E. (1990), Chaos in Brain Function, Berlin.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75545-3

Cohnitz D. (2005), Is Compositionality an a Priori Principle? In: Wening M., Machery E., Schurz G. (Hrsg.), The Compositionality of Concepts and Meanings, Ontos.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110323627.23

Elman J. L. (1990), Finding Structure in Time. In: Cognitive Science, 14, S. 179–211.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(90)90002-E

Elman J. L. (1991), Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure. In: Machine Learning, 7, S. 195–224.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022699029236

Elman J. L. (1995), Language as a Dynamical System. In: Port R., van Gelder T. (Hrsg.), Mind as Motion, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Frege G. (1879), Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle/S.
Google Scholar

Gallagher S. (2005), How the Body Shapes the Mind, New York.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199271941.001.0001

Jordan M. I., Rosenbaum D. A. (1988), Action. Technical Report 88-26, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Google Scholar

Kelso J. A. S., Ding M., Schöner G. (1992), Dynamic Pattern Formation: A Primer. In: Baskin A. B., Mittenthal J. E. (Hrsg.), Principles of Organization in Organisms. SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, AddisonWesley.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2523.003.0006

Malsburg von der C. (1999), The What and Why of Binding: The Modeler’s Perspective. In: Neuron, 24, S. 95–104.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80825-9

Port R. F., Gelder van T. (Hrsg.), (1995), Mind as Motion. Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, Cambridge, Bradford.
Google Scholar

Senge P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York.
Google Scholar

Seppänen A., Suuronen T., Hofmann S., Majamaa K., Alafuzoff I. (2007), Distribution of Collagen XVII in the Human Brain. In: Brain Res., 1158, S. 50–56.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.073

Singer W. (1999), Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? In: Neuron, 24, S. 49–65.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80821-1

Stephan A. (2005), Emergenz. Von der Unvorhersagbarkeit zur Selbstorganisation, Tübingen.
Google Scholar

Tarnopolski O. (2012), Constructivist Blended Learning Approach to Teaching English for Specific Purposes, London.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560014

Thelen E., Smith L. B. (1996), A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, London.
Google Scholar

Werning M. (2004), Compositionaltity, Context, Categories and the Indeterminacy of Translation. In: Erkenntnis, 60, S. 145–78.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERKE.0000012876.85940.b3

Wildgen W. (1998), Chaos, Fractals and Dissipative Structures in Language or the End of Linguistic Structuralism. In: Koch W., Altmann G. (Hrsg.), Systems: New Paradigms for the Human Sciences, Berlin, S. 596–620.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801194.596

Wildgen W. (2008), Kognitive Grammatik. Klassische Paradigmen und neue Perspektiven, Berlin.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110976724