Artificial Intelligence and Deficit of Personnel in the Romanian Police

Authors

  • Gabriel Crap Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.1.49.06

Keywords:

Romanian Police, artificial intelligence, public management, personnel deficit, financial efficiency, predictive policing

Abstract

The purpose of the article. Staff shortages in Romania’s Police and Border Police have reached critical levels, with vacancy rates of 15% to over 28% in several counties. These shortfalls impose direct financial burdens through overtime, standby pay, and productivity losses while also degrading service quality. This article assesses whether — and to what extent artificial intelligence can offset these gaps and reduce the related fiscal strain. Drawing on international case studies, Romanian staffing data, and recent literature on public-sector digitalization, the study argues that targeted AI deployment can shift the emphasis from a quantitative staffing model to a qualitative efficiency model. The central hypothesis is that automating administrative and surveillance tasks with AI could substitute for roughly 15–25% of current personnel vacancies in Romanian law enforcement without proportional budget increases. The article also addresses principal risks algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, and governance gaps and proposes a phased implementation framework consistent with the EU regulatory requirements.

Methodology: The study uses comparative cases, Romanian staffing data, and EU – national policy analysis to assess AI’s governance and fiscal implications in policing, acknowledging its conceptual, document‑based design and lack of primary data.

Results of the research: Romania’s severe police vacancies create safety and fiscal pressures, with understaffing driving overtime, reduced service quality, and declining trust. Targeted AI could offset part of the gap cost-effectively, but cannot replace human roles and requires strong governance. A phased national strategy and further empirical research remain essential for future implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S. & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica, 23 May.

Bannister, F. & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128.

Bouckaert, G. & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343.

Brayne, S. (2021). Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing. Oxford University Press.

Chen S. (2026). AI Call Center Pricing: Complete Cost Breakdown. https://turbocall.net/blog/ai-call-center-pricing/.

Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P.G. & Røvik, K.A. (2020). Organization Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth. Routledge.

Cory, C. & Birzer, M. (2024). The emergence of Tele-Cops. Police Practice and Research [in press]. Wichita Police Department / Wichita State University.

De Cardenas V. (2024). Palm Beach Co. Sheriff’s office invests $1.3 m in AI to streamline police reporting. https://cbs12.com/news/local/palm-beach-co-sheriffs-office-invests-13-million-in-ai-to-streamline-police-reporting.

Doshi-Velez, F. & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is deadlong live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.

Ferguson, A.G. (2017). The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York University Press.

Flock Safety. (2023). LPR cameras: 4 cases solved. https://www.flocksafety.com/articles/lpr-camera-4-cases-solved.

Griffith, D.D. (2017). Artificial intelligence and law enforcement. Police Magazine. https://www.policemag.com/technology/article/15346433/artificial-intelligence-and-law-enforcement.

Hood, C. & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK Central Government. Oxford University Press.

Ion, I. (2025). Cum vrea Poliția Capitalei să prevină fraudele online cu ajutorul AI. Libertatea. https://www.libertatea.ro/stiri/cum-vrea-politia-capitalei-sa-previna-fraudele-online-cu-ajutorul-ai-nu-da-click-nu-da-cod-protejeaza-ti-contul-tot-video-5186810.

License Plate Reader Cost: Your Essential Planning Guide (2025). www.platesmart.com/alpr-costs-simplified-essential-guide.

Meijer, A. & Bolívar, M.P.R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.

Moore, M., & Poethig, E. (1999). The police as an agency of municipal government. In: W. Skogan & K. Frydl (eds.), Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing. National Academies Press.

Murphy, A. (2023). Camera network helped find Midtown mass shooting suspect, police say. Atlanta News First. https://www.atlantanewsfirst.com/2023/05/04/camera-network-helped-find-midtown-mass-shooting-suspect-police-say.

OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. oecd.ai/en/ai-principles.

Penescu, C. (2025). Drone, roboți, AIPoliție, Jandarmerie. Ancheta Zilei. https://anchetazilei.ro/2025/02/06/drone-roboti-ai-politie-jandarmerie-14470.

Perera, G., Lu, T. & Chow, E. (2021). TruePALan AI assistant for first responder safety. NASA Technical Report.

Perry, W.L., McInnis, B., Price, C.C., Smith, S.C. & Hollywood, J.S. (2013). Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. RAND Corporation.

Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative AnalysisInto the Age of Austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ratcliffe, J.H. (2016). Intelligence-Led Policing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S. & Guestrin, C. (2016). ‘Why should I trust you?’: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135–1144).

Staff Shortages. (2025). Union and Parliamentary committee data on Romanian Police vacancies. Various union communications, January–February.

UK Police AI centre. (2024). New £115 m AI centre for policing will help catch more criminals quicker. https://news.npcc.police.uk/releases/new-gbp-115m-ai-centre-for-policing-will-help-catch-more-criminals-quicker.

Zachek, O., Dmytryk, Yu. & Senyk, V. (2013). The role of artificial intelligence in increasing efficiency of law enforcement activities. Scientific Journal of Lviv State University of Internal AffairsLaw, 3, 148–156.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Crap, Gabriel. 2026. “Artificial Intelligence and Deficit of Personnel in the Romanian Police”. Journal of Finance and Financial Law 1 (49): 121-34. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.1.49.06.