Cicero und Andokides

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.26.09

Słowa kluczowe:

Cyceron, Andokides, retoryka starożytna, naśladownictwo, intertekstualność

Abstrakt

Due to the fact that Andocides is nowhere mentioned in Cicero’s oeuvre it is universally assumed that Cicero could not have read, let alone been inspired by, the works of Andocides. By comparing several passages from both orators, this paper argues that this is not necessarily the case. In terms of both language and content, these texts bear so close a resemblance to one another, that a direct influence does not seem beyond question. If Cicero had indeed, whether deliberately or otherwise, borrowed some ideas and/or phrases from Andocides, the absence of the latter’s name in Cicero’s extant writings can be explained in two different ways: (1) either certain expressions that occur in Andocides’ speeches could have been known to Cicero from indirect tradition, (2) or Cicero was simply reluctant to admit to his acquaintance with the least esteemed of the ten Attic orators.

Biogram autora

Damian Pierzak - Badacz niezależny

Dr Damian Pierzak – is former Assistant Professor of Classics at the University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. After obtaining his PhD in 2015 he carried out a research project “Arguments from the Past in Cicero’s Orations. Theory and Practice” as part of the SONATA 12 competition, which was completed in early 2021. His main research interest are Roman oratory and Latin literature of the Republican period. He is the author of numerous articles and two monographs: Ab inferis ad rostra. Przywoływanie zmarłych w retoryce rzymskiej okresu republikańskiego, Katowice 2019 and Exempla externa in Cicero’s orations. A Rhetorical Approach, Berlin 2021.

Bibliografia

Aeschines. (1997). Orationes. Ed. M.R. Dilts. Stutgardiae, Lipsiae: B.G. Teubner.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110953916

Antipho et Andocides. (2018). Orationes. Rec. M.R. Dilts, D.J. Murphy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Cicero M.T. (1905–1911). Orationes. Rec. A.C. Clark, W. Peterson. 6 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Demetrius. (1901). Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de elocutione libellus. Ed. L. Radermacher. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
Google Scholar

Demosthenes. (2002). Orationes. Rec. M.R. Dilts. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Dio Cassius. (1914). Roman History. Vol. III. English Translation by E. Cary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann LTD.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.dio_cassius-roman_history.1914

Achard, G. (1981). Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours “optimates” de Cicéron. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004327863

Barber, K.A. (2004). Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Balbo. An Interpretation. New York, London: Rout-ledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203497661

Benner, H. (1987). Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher. Untersuchungen zur Denaturierung des Clientelwesens in der ausgehenden römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2007). “Graecophile or Graecophobe? Cicero’s Choice between Greek and Roman Exempla”. CO 84.4. 157–162.
Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2010). Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582938.001.0001

Boll, T. (2019). Ciceros Rede cum senatui gratias egit. Ein Kommentar. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110643091

Bücher, F. (2006). Verargumentierte Geschichte. Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Google Scholar

Classen, C.J. (1985). Recht – Rhetorik – Politik. Untersuchungen zu Ciceros rhetorischer Strategie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling Laughter. Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Craig, C.P. (1993). Form as Argument in Cicero’s Speeches. A Study of Dilemma, Atlanta: Scholars Press.
Google Scholar

Douglas, A.E. (1956). “Cicero, Quintilian, and the Canon of Ten Attic Orators”. Mnemosyne 9.1. 30–40.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852556X00052

Douglas, A.E. (1966). M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Douglas, A.E. (1973). “The Intellectual Background of Cicero’s Rhetorica: A Study in Method”. ANRW I 3. 95–138.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110836424-005

Dufallo, B. (2001). “Appius’ Indignation: Gossip, Tradition, and Performance in Republican Rome”. TAPhA 131. 119–142.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2001.0005

Dufallo, B. (2007). The Ghosts of the Past. Latin Literature, the Dead, and Rome’s Transition to a Principate. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
Google Scholar

Edwards, M. (2013). Hypokritēs in action: delivery in Greek rhetoric. In: C. Kremmydas, J. Powell, L. Rubinstein (eds.). Profession and Performance: Aspects of Oratory in the Greco-Roman World. London: School of Advanced Study. 15–25.
Google Scholar

Edwards, M. (2016). Greek Political Oratory and the Canon of Ten Attic Orators. In: P. Derron (ed.). La rhétorique du pouvoir. Une exploration de l’art oratoire délibératif grec. Vandœuvres: Fondation Hardt. 15–34.
Google Scholar

Fleck, M. (1993). Cicero als Historiker. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110933055

Gaertner, J.F. (2007). The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity. In: J.F. Gaertner (ed.). Writing Exile: The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden, Boston: E. J. Brill. 1–20.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004155152.i-298.7

Gelzer, M. (1969). Cicero. Ein biographischer Versuch. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
Google Scholar

Habinek, T. (2005). The World of Roman Song. From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Heftner, H. (1995). Plutarch und der Aufstieg des Pompeius. Ein historischer Kommentar zu Plutarchs Pompeiusvita, Teil I: Kap. 1–45. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Heldmann, K. (1982). Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst. München: C. H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Jost, K. (1936). Das Beispiel und Vorbild der Vorfahren bei den attischen Rednern und Geschichtsschreibern bis Demosthenes. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Google Scholar

Kaster, R.A. (2005). Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195140781.001.0001

Kennedy, G.A. (1963). The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Kenty, J. (2020). Cicero’s Political Personae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878098

Kurczyk, S. (2006). Cicero und die Inszenierung der eigenen Vergangenheit. Autobiographisches Schreiben in der späten Römischen Republik. Köln: Böhlau.
Google Scholar

Laughton, E. (1961). “Cicero and the Greek Orators”. AJPh 82.1. 27–49.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/292005

MacDowell, D. (1962). Andokides. On the Mysteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

MacKendrick, P. (1995). The Speeches of Cicero. London: Duckworth.
Google Scholar

Maresch, K., Packman, Z.M. (1990). Papyri from the Washington University Collection St. Louis, Missouri. Part II (P. Wash. Univ. II). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-98454-8

May, J.M. (1988). Trials of Character. The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469616322.001.0001

Mitchell, T.N. (1986). Cicero: Verrines II.1. Warminster: Aris & Phillips LTD.
Google Scholar

Neumeister, C. (1964). Grundsätze der forensischen Rhetorik, gezeigt an Gerichtsreden Ciceros. München: Max Hueber.
Google Scholar

Opelt, I. (1979). “Zur politischen Polemik des Redners Andokides”. Glotta 57.3/4. 210–218.
Google Scholar

Orsini, P. (2005). Manoscritti in maiuscola biblica. Materiali per un aggiornamento. Cassino: Edizioni dell’Università degli Studi di Cassino.
Google Scholar

Pierzak, D. (2019). Ab inferis ad rostra. Przywoływanie zmarłych w retoryce rzymskiej okresu republikańskiego. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar

Pierzak, D. (2021). Exempla externa in Cicero’s Orations. A Rhetorical Approach. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b18910

Ptaszek, I. (2002). Andokides. Mowy. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.
Google Scholar

Ricchieri, T. (2016). “Un «canone» di oratori romani? Cicerone, il finale del Brutus e i dieci oratori attici”. Maia 68.3. 665–688.
Google Scholar

Schwyzer, E. (1950). Griechische Grammatik. 2 Bd. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik hrsg. von A. Debrunner. München: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (1975). Taxis und Taktik. Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110951318

Stroh, W. (1982). Die Nachahmung des Demosthenes in Ciceros Philippiken. In: W. Ludwig (ed.). Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron. Vandoeuvres, Genève: Fondation Hardt. 1–31.
Google Scholar

Süss, W. (1910). Ethos. Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik. Leipzig, Berlin: B.G. Teubner (repr. Aalen: Scientia 1975).
Google Scholar

Tatum, W.J. (1999). The Patrician Tribune. Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar

Tempest, K.L. (2007). “Cicero and the art of dispositio: the structure of the Verrines”. LICS 6.02. 1–25.
Google Scholar

Tempest, K.L. (2013). “Staging a prosecution: aspects of performance in Cicero’s Verrines”. In: C. Kremmydas, J. Powell, L. Rubinstein (eds.). Profession and Performance: Aspects of Oratory in the Greco-Roman World. London: School of Advanced Study. 41–71.
Google Scholar

Tempest, K.L. (2019). “Meidias and the Mute Witness: Cicero’s Debt to Demosthenes in the Verrines Reconsidered”. GRBS 59. 215–241.
Google Scholar

Usher, S. (1999). Greek Oratory. Tradition and Originality. Oxford: Oxford University Press (repr. 2007).
Google Scholar

Weische, A. (1972). Ciceros Nachahmung der attischen Redner. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Google Scholar

Westwood, G. (2017). The Orator and the Ghosts: Performing the Past in Fourth-Century Athens. In: S. Papaioannou, A. Serafim, B. da Vela (eds.). The Theatre of Justice. Aspects of Performance in Greco-Roman Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden, Boston: E.J. Brill. 57–74.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004341876_006

Wooten, C.W. (1983). Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model. The Rhetoric of Crisis. Chapel Hill, London: The University of North Carolina Press.
Google Scholar

Worthington, I. (1994). The Canon of the Ten Attic Orators. In: I. Worthington (ed.). Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action. London, New York: Routledge. 244–263.
Google Scholar

Zimmermann, B. (2002). “Exil und Autobiographie”. A&A 48. 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241600.187
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241600.187

Opublikowane

2023-10-05

Jak cytować

Pierzak, D. (2023). Cicero und Andokides. Collectanea Philologica, (26), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.26.09