La quatrième croisade et ses conséquences pour la Bulgarie médiévale: le tzar Kaloyan, les Latins et les Grecs (1204–1207)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.03.02Abstrakt
The analysis of the Bulgarian-Latin relations between 1204 and 1207, i.e. in the second half of Tsar Kaloyan’s reign, leads to conclusions as follows: 1. the Bulgarian monarch played a major role in forcing the newly-created Latin empire to adopt a defensive policy in the political struggles in the Balkan Peninsula; 2. thus, the Tsar contributed to retaining and, in consequence, consolidating the remnants of the Byzantine empire (Nicaea, Epirus-Thessalonica); 3. in the Byzantine memory the actions of Kaloyan were evaluated negatively, as times of plundering the Byzantine territories and relocations of its population into Bulgaria; 4. for the later Bulgarian historiography the Tsar’s wars with the Latins were of secondary significance, and despite the official union with the Roman church he was remembered as a defender of the Orthodox faith.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Gjuzelev V., Четвъртият кръстоносен поход, превземането на Цариград и Българо-Латинските отношения 1204–1207 г., „Palaeobulgarica/Старобългаристика” 28.2, 2004, p. 80–88.
Nicetas Choniates, Historia, rec. I.A. van Dieten, Berolini et Novi Eboraci 1975, p. 535.
Nicetas Choniates, Orationes et epistulae, rec. I.A. van Dieten, Berolini et Novi Eboraci 1972.
Dölger F., Regesten der Kaiserurkunden des ostromischen Reiches von 565–1453, vol. II, Regesten von 1025–1204, N 1661.
Demetrius Chomatenus, Ponemata diaphora, rec. G. Prinzing, Berolini et Novi Eboraci 2002.
Преписката на папа Инокентия ІІІ с българите, ed. И. Дуйчев, „Годишник на Софийския Университет. Историко-Филологически факултет” 37, 1942, p. 31.
Georgius Acropolites, Historia, rec. A. Heisenberg, Lipsiae 1903.
Каухчишвили С.Г., Грузинские источники по истории Византии, vol. I, Тбилиси 1974.
Geoffroy de Villehardouin, La conquete de Constantinople, 202, ed. et trans. E. Faral, Paris 1938.
de Clari Robert, La conquete de Constantinople, 64, ed. Ph. Lauer, Paris 1924.
Libro de los fechos et conquistas del principado de la Morea, publiée et traduite pour la première fois par A. Morel-Fatio, Genève 1885.
Венециански документи за историята на България и българите от ХІІ–ХV в., ed. В. Гюзелев, София 2001.
Златарски В.Н., История на българската държава през средните векове, vol. ІІІ, Второ българско царство. България при Асеневци (1187–1280), София 1940.
Божилов И., Гюзелев В., История на средновековна България VІІ–ХІV век, София 1999.
Gjuzelev V., Bulgarien und Kaiserreich von Nikaia (1204–1261), „Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik” 26, 1977, p. 145–146.
Ceruti A., Un codice del monastero cistercense di Lucedio, „Archivio storico Italiano” 8, 1881.
Ostrogorsky G., Geschichte des byzantinischen Staates, München 1963.
Theodorus Scutariotes, Σύνοψις χρονική, [in:] C. Sathas, Bibliotheca graeca medii aevi, vol. VII, Parisiis 1894, p. 459–460.
Werke des Patriarchen von Bulgarien Enthymius (1375–1393), nach den besten Handschriften hrsg. von E. Kalužniacki, Wien 1901.
Божилов И., Тотоманова А., Билярски И., Борилов Синодик. Издание и превод, София 2010.
Попов А., Обзор хронографов русской редакции, vol. І, Москва 1866, p. 190–192; vol. ІІІ, Москва 1869, p. 33–34, 36–37, 144–145.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Jak cytować
