Pets of Konrad Lorenz. Theorizing in the social world of pet owners

Krzysztof T. Konecki

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.3.1.08

Authors

Krzysztof T. Konecki Lodz University, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.3.1.08

Keywords:

Sociology of human animals – non-human animals relationships, Symbolic interaction, Anthropomorphisation, Social world, Legitimization, Theorizing, Arena

Abstract

This article explores the personal account titled Man meets dog ([1949] 2002) by an outstanding ethologist Konrad Lorenz who is one of the key theoreticians of the social world of pet owners. His lines of argumentation and categories of pet perception within this social world may be reconstructed from his personal recollections. The concepts of the social world and arena are the key notions that integrate the current analysis. The arena is also formed in the course of the inner conversation and is often going together with the outer disputes of a social world . It might seem that Konrad Lorenz as a scientist and ethologist should avoid using anthropomorphic categories. However, as he shares the same space (including private space) and communicates with domestic animals, the author tends to anthropomorphise their behaviour, even though formally he opposes or even despises the idea, applying a disdainful term of “sentimental anthropomorphisation” to people who do so. Additionally, the article addresses the biographic context of the ethologist’s life and his writings together with the activities of the Second World War as well as his collaboration with the Nazi government. Konrad Lorenz represents the socalled “cult of nature” approach which, in the opinion of his opponents, has a lot in common with the Nazi doctrine (Sax 1997).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Krzysztof T. Konecki, Lodz University, Poland

Krzysztof T. Konecki is a Professor of Sociology, chair of Organizational and Management Sociology Department, Lodz University, Poland. His major research areas are: qualitative sociology, grounded theory methodology, symbolic interactionism, visual sociology, sociology of management and organization, sociology of work, organizational symbolism, Japanese culture and management, human-non-human-animals relationships

References

Alger, Janet M. and Steven F. Alger (2003) Cat Culture : The Social World of a Cat Shelter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Arluke, Arnold and Clinton Sanders (1996) Regarding Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Becker, Howard (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Belk, Russel W. (1996) “Metaphoric relationship with pets.” Society and Animals 4(2):121-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853096X00115

Clarke, Adele (1991) “Social Worlds/Arenas Theory as Organizational Theory.” Pp. 119–158 in Social Organization and social Process. Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss, edited by D. Maines. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Deichman, Ute (1996) Biologists under Hitler. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Dlugosz–Kurczabowa, Krystyna (2003) Nowy slownik etymologiczny jezyka polskiego (The new etymology dictionary of Polish). Warszawa: PWN.

Foote, Nelson N. (1956) “A neglected member of the family.” Marriage and family living 28:213-18. Franklin, Adrian (1999) Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/347207

Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss (1964) “Awareness Contexts and Social Interaction.” American Sociological Review 29(5):669-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2091417

Goode, David (2007) Playing With My Dog Katie. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.

Griffin, Donald R. (1992) Animal Minds. Beyond Cognition to Consciousness. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hickrod, Lucy J. H. and Raymond L Schmitt (1982) “A naturalistic study of interaction and frame: The pet as a family member.” Urban Life 11(1):55-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124168201100103

Irvin, Leslie (2004) If you tame me. Understanding our connections with animals. Temple University Press.

Kacperczyk, Anna (2004) Zastosowanie koncepcji społecznych światów w badaniach empirycznych [Application of the concept of social worlds in empirical research]. Paper presented at the 12th Polish Sociological Congress, September 10, Poznan, Poland.

Katcher, Aaron H. and Allan M. Beck, editors (1983) New perspectives on our lives with companion animals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

Kennedy, John S. (1992) The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge: The University of Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623455

Lazari-Pawlowska, Ilja (1992) Etyka. Pisma zebrane. Wroclaw: Zaklad Narodowy im. Ossolinskich.

Lorenz, Konrad (1974) “Autobiography.” Les Prix Nobel en 1973, October. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation. Retrieved February 20, 2007 http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1973/lorenzautobio.html

Lorenz, Konrad (1975) Tak zwane zło (The So Called Evil). Warszawa: PWN.

Lorenz, Konrad (1977) Odwrotna strona zwierciadla. Proba historii naturalnej ludzkiego poznania (Behind the Mirror). Warszawa: PIW.

Lorenz, Konrad (1986) Regres człowieczeństwa (The wanning of humaness). Warszawa: PIW.

Lorenz, Konrad (1997) Rozmawial z bydletami, ptakami rybami. Opowiadania o zwierzetach (King Solomon's Ring). Warszawa: Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie Muza S.A.

Lorenz, Konrad ([1949] 2002) Man meets Dog (So kam der Mensch auf dem Hund). London-New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166086

Lowe, Brian M. (2002) “Hearts and Minds and Morality: Analyzing Moral Vocabularies in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Sociology 25(1):105-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014312425831

Menache, Sophia (1997) “Dogs: God’s Worst Enemies.” Society and Animals 5(1):23-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853097X00204

Morris, Paul, Margaret Fiedler and Alan Costall (2000) "Beyond Anecdotes; An Empirical Study of 'Anthropomorphism'". Society & Animals 8(2):151-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853000511050

Regan, Tom and Peter Singer, editors (1976) Animal rights and human obligations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

RSRP (2002) The Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland. Warszawa: Zaklad Wydawnictw Statystycznych.

Sanders, Clinton (1990) “Excusing tactics: Social responses to the public misbehavior of companion animals.” Anthrozoos 4(2):82-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/089279391787057288

Sanders, Clinton (1993) “Understanding dogs: Caretakers’ attributes of mindedness in canine – human relationship.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22:205–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022002003

Sanders, Clinton (1999) Understanding Dogs: Living and Working with Canine Companions. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Sax, Boria (1997) “What is a ‘Jewish Dog’? Konrad Lorenz and Cult of Wildness.” Society and Animals 5(1):3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853097X00196

Sax, Boria (2000) Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust. New York: Continuum.

Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford M. Lyman (1975) “Accounts.” Pp. 146–170 in Readings in Social Psychology, edited by A. Lindesmith, A. Strauss. and N. Denzin. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press.

Serpell, James A. (1996) In the Company of Animals. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shibutani, Tamotsu (1994) “Reference Group as Perspectives.” Pp. 128-145 in Symbolic Interaction. An Introduction to Social Psychology, edited by N. Herman and L. Reynolds. Dix Hills, New York: General Hall Inc.

Strauss, Anselm (1978) “A social world perspective.” Pp. 119-128 in Studies in Symbolic Interaction vol. 1, edited by N. Denzin. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Strauss, Anselm (1982) “Social World and Legitimation Processes.” Pp. 171-90 in Studies in Symbolic Interaction vol. 4, edited by N. Denzin. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.

Strauss, Anselm (1993) Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Sussman, Marvin B., editor (1985) Pets and family. New York: Haworth.

Sykes, Gresham M. and David Matza (1979) “Techniques of Neutralization: A theory of Deliquency.” Pp. 497-504 in Social Interaction. Introductory Readings in Sociology, edited by H. Robboy, S.Greenblatt and C. Clark. New York: St. Martin Press.

Veevers, Jean E. (1985) “The social meaning of pets: Alternative roles for companion animals.” Marriage and Family Review 8:11-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v08n03_03