Probabilistic approach to epistemic modals in the framework of dynamic semantics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.30.03Keywords:
dynamic semantics, probabilistic semantics, epistemic modalsAbstract
In dynamic semantics meaning of a statement is not equated with its truth conditions but with its context change potential. It has also been claimed that dynamic framework can automatically account for certain paradoxes that involve epistemic modals, such as the following one: it seems odd and incoherent to claim: (1) “It is raining and it might not rain”, whereas claiming (2) “It might not rain and it is raining” does not seem equally odd (Yalcin, 2007). Nevertheless, it seems that it cannot capture the fact that statement (2) seems odd as well, even though not as odd as the statement (1) (Gauker, 2007). I will argue that certain probabilistic extensions to the dynamic model can account for this subtlety of our linguistic intuitions and represent if not an improved than at least an alternative framework for capturing the way contexts are updated and beliefs revised with uncertain information.
References
Baltag Alexandru, Smets Sonja, 2008, Probabilistic Dynamic Belief Revision, “Synthese” 165 (2), pp. 179–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9369-8
Dowty, David, Wall, Robert, and Peters, Stanley, 1981, Introduction to Montague Semantics, Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9065-4
Dorr, Cian, Hawthorne John, 2012, Embedding Epistemic Modals, manuscript. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt091
Egan, Andy, 2007, Epistemic modals, relativism and assertion, “Philosophical Studies”, 133(1), pp.1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9003-x
Frege, Gottlob, 2001, On Sense and Reference, [in:] David Sosa (ed.), Analytic Philosophy: an Anthology, Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 7–19.
Gauker, Christopher, Comments on dynamic semantics. APA Central Division Chicago.
Groenendijk, Jeroen, Stokhof, Martin, 1991, Dynamic predicate logic, “Linguistics and Philosophy” 14 (1), pp. 39–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628304
Groenendijk, Jeroen, Stokhof, Martin, 1996, Changing the context: dynamic semantics and discourse, [in:] Edit Doron & Shuly Wintner (eds), IATL 3: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference and of the Workshop on Discourse, Jerusalem: Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 104–128.
Geach, Peter, 1962, Reference and Generality, New York: Cornell University Press.
Goodman, Noah, Lassiter, Daniel, 2014. Probabilistic semantics and pragmatics: Uncertainty in language and thought, [in:] Shalom Lappin (ed), Handbook of Contemporary Semantics, Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, pp: 1–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch21
Goodman Noah, Lassiter Daniel, Communicating with Epistemic Modals in Stochastic λ-Calculus, manuscript.
Holliday, Wesley Halcrow, Icard, Thomas Frederick III, 2013, Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals, “Semantics and Linguistic Theory” 23, pp. 514–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2670
Janssen, Theo M. V., “Montague Semantics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/montague-semantics/
Kratzer, Angelika, 2012, Modals and Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.003.0004
Sorensen, Roy, 2009, Meta-agnosticism: Higher Order Epistemic Possibility, “Mind” 118 (471), pp: 777–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzp105
Van Eijck, Jan, Lappin Shalom, 2014, Probabilistic Semantics for Natural Language, unpublished manuscript
Veltman, Frank, 1996, Defaults in update semantics, “Journal of Philosophical Logic” 25 (3), pp. 221–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248150
Willer, Martha, 2013, Dynamics of Epistemic Modality, “Philosophical Review” 122 (1), pp.45–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1728714
Yalcin, Seth, 2007, Epistemic Modals, “Mind” 116 (464), pp. 983–1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm983
Yalcin, Seth, 2010, Probability Operators, “Philosophy Compass”, 5 (11), pp. 916–937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00360.x
Yalcin, Seth, 2012. Context Probabilism, [in:] Maria Aloni (ed.), 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 12–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
