Political liberalism and political emotions – an unlikely alliance? On Martha Nussbaum’s approach to stability

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.39.02

Keywords:

political liberalism, emotions, stability, dignity, human good

Abstract

The paper offers a type of internal criticism of Martha Nussbaum’s liberal political philosophy. On the one hand, Nussbaum’s claims to political liberalism (as defined by Rawls) are questioned. It is argued that her capabilities-based liberalism remains committed to a broader, primarily Aristotelian account of the human condition. As a result, it exceeds the limits imposed by political liberalism with its focus on citizenship and non-comprehensive foundations of political regimes. On the other hand, the paper argues that Nussbaum’s project can meet the basic normative objective of political liberalism. That is to say, it offers a convincing solution to the question: how can liberal values be stable in a society, given that liberalism endorses the plurality of acceptable normative doctrines? Nussbaum is able to address this issue, because her rich philosophical commitments allow her to complement liberal tenets with a compatible account of practical reasoning complementary. The paper focuses on one of the elements of this conception, i.e. Nussbaum’s theory of emotions and their role in a political culture.

References

Alexander, John M., 2014, [in:] Social Justice and Nussbaum’s Conception of the Person, [in:] F. Comim, M.C. Nussbaum (eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 414-436; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139059138.021

Bendik-Keymer, Jeremy, 2014, [in:] Social Justice and Nussbaum’s Conception of the Person, [in:] F. Comim, M.C. Nussbaum (eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175-191;

Comim, Flavio, 2014, [in:] Social Justice and Nussbaum’s Conception of the Person, [in:] F. Comim, M.C. Nussbaum (eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131-153; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139059138

Larmore, Charles E., 2001, Patterns of Moral Complexity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;

Larmore, Charles E., 2003, The Morals of Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;

Lisowska, Urszula, 2015, Vulnerability as a perceptual category – Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach from the perspective of political aesthetics, “Hybris” 28, pp. 116-140;

Okin, Susan M., 1999, Reply, [in:] J. Cohen et alt. (eds.), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 115-131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840991-018

Nussbaum, Martha C., 1987, Nature, Function, Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution Political Theory, WIDER Working Paper 31;

Nussbaum, Martha C., 1992, Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism, “Political Theory”, 20/2, pp. 202-246; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020002002

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2000, Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2003, Political Liberalism and Respect, “Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy”, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 28-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2003.25

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2007, Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2008, Upheavals of Thought. The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014;

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2009, The Therapy of Desire. Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831944

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2011a, Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press;

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2011b, Perfectionist and Political Liberalism, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 39, no. 1, 2011, pp. 3-45; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01200.x

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2013, Political Emotions. Why Love Matters for Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press;

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2014, Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics, https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/human_dignity/chapter14.html accessed: 31-10-2014;

Rawls, John, 1971, 1999, A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582

Rawls, John, 1993, 1996, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press;

Sen, Amartya, 1981, Poverty and the Famines. An Essays on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Clarendon Press;

Winnicott, Donald W., 1987, The Child, the Family, and the Outside World, Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lisowska, Urszula. 2017. “Political Liberalism and Political Emotions – an Unlikely Alliance? On Martha Nussbaum’s Approach to Stability”. Hybris 39 (4): 19-37. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.39.02.