Territorial governance of cultural heritage through spatial planning in Albania and Kosovo

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.03

Keywords:

territorial governance, spatial planning, cultural heritage, cultural preservation, urban identity

Abstract

Cultural and historical heritage is inextricably linked to territorial capital. Over the years, the recognition of its importance has increased in the political and policy discourse. This paper examines these challenges considering spatial planning policies and instruments, namely “how effective spatial planning instruments are in addressing the goal of protecting and enhancing cultural heritage.” The research is focused on two Western Balkan cases of Albania and Kosovo, and takes a comparative approach, considering the ever-present conflict between “the old and the new”, and between growth and preservation, in the respective capital cities of Tirana and Pristina. Both countries have gone through drastic transformations in their planning systems over the last two decades, with an attempt to shift from traditional rigid urbanism approaches towards more comprehensive and integrated ones. Additionally, the two countries are in similar stages of socio-economic development, which include a trend of concentration and rapid urban development. The findings suggest that while cultural preservation and valorisation is ranked high in terms of planning policies, both countries fail to preserve these values when it comes to land development practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AL-HOUDALIEH, S. and SAUDERS, R. (2009), ‘Building Destruction: The Consequences of Rising Urbanization on Cultural Heritage in the Ramallah Province’, International Journal of Cultural Property. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739109090043
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739109090043

ALLKJA, L. (2019), ‘Territorial Governance through Spatial Planning in Albania and Kosovo’, Annual Review of Territorial Governance in the Western Balkans, pp. 42–53. https://doi.org/10.32034/CP-TGWBAR-I01-04
Google Scholar

ANGELIDOUA, M., KARACHALIOUA, E., ANGELIDOUA, T. and STYLIANIDIS, E. (2017), ‘Cultural Heritage in Smart City Environments’, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 27–32. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-27-2017
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-27-2017

ASIG (2021), Orthophoto, retrieved from Geoportal: https://geoportal.asig.gov.al/map/?fc_name=qytete&auto=true
Google Scholar

BERISHA, E., COLIC, N., COTELLA, G. and NEDOVIĆ-BUDIĆ, Z. (2018), ‘Mind the Gap: Spatial Planning Systems in the Western Balkans Region’, Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 2 (1), pp. 47–62. https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2018.01.004
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2018.01.004

CHEN, F., LUDWIG, C. and SYKES, O. (2020), ‘Heritage Conservation through Planning: A Comparison of Policies and Principles in England and China’, Planning Practice & Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1752472
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1752472

Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (European Commission) (2018), Participatory governance of cultural heritage, Luxembourg: European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/765030
Google Scholar

DOBRICIC, M., RISTIC, S. and JOSIMOVIĆ, B. (2016), ‘The spatial planning, protection and man-agement of world heritage in Serbia’, Spatium, 1, pp. 75–83. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1636075D
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1636075D

EU (2007), Territorial Agenda of the European Union – Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, Leipzig: Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/communications/2007/territorial-agenda-of-the-european-union-towards-a-more-competitive-and-sustainable-europe-of-diverse-regions
Google Scholar

EU (2011), Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 – Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse, Godollo, Hungart: e Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_pol-icy/en/information/publications/communications/2011/territorial-agenda-of-the-european-union-2020
Google Scholar

EU (2020), Territorial Agenda 2030: A future for all places -Draft. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_pol-icy/en/information/publications/brochures/2021/territorial-agenda-2030-a-future-for-all-places
Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1999), ESDP – European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, EC. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
Google Scholar

FALUDI, A. (ed.) (2007), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society, Cambridge, Mas-sachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/books/territorial-cohesion-european-model-society
Google Scholar

FINPIEMONTE (2021), Financial Instruments and Innovative Financial Schemes for Cultural Heritage, INTERREG Europe Project, financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Available online: https://www.interregentral.eu/Content.Node/02.-Financial-schemes.pdf
Google Scholar

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UN (2015), Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Google Scholar

GEOPORTAL (2020, November 02), Orthophoto Pristina, retrieved from Geoportal Kosovo: http://geoportal.rks-gov.net/search?municipalityId=19
Google Scholar

GUNAY, Z. (2008), ‘Neoliberal Urbanism and Sustainability of Cultural Heritage’, 44th ISOCARP Congress Proceedings. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?-doi=10.1.1.572.8293&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Google Scholar

GUZMAN, P. and RODERS, A. P. (2014), ‘Bridging the gap between urban development and cultural heritage protection’, “IAIA14 Conference Proceedings” Impact Assessment for Social and Economic Development, Vina del Mar, Chile: 34th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4633.7923
Google Scholar

IMAMI, F. and DHRAMI, K. (2019), ‘Strengthening cooperation for spatial planning: A case study on participatory planning in Albania’, [in:] Annual Review of Territorial Governance in Western Balkans, 1, Co-PLAN and POLIS press. http://www.co-plan.org/en/strengthening-cooperation-for-spatial-planning-a-case-study-on-participatory-planning-in-albania/
Google Scholar

JELINCIC, D. A. and ŠVEB, M. (2021), ‘Financial Sustainability of Cultural Heritage: A Review of Crowdfunding in Europe’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14, p. 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030101
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030101

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANING; INSTITUTE FOR SPATIAL PLANNING (2010), National Spatial Plan of Kosovo 2010-2020+, MESP. http://www.ammk-rks.net/repository/docs/Spatial_Plan_of_Kosova_2010-2020.pdf
Google Scholar

MUKA, R. (2020), ‘Co-existence of urban cultural heritage with future developments in the city of Tirana through Financial Instruments of Land Development’, Master’s Thesis, Polis University.
Google Scholar

MUNICIPALITY OF PRISTINA (2011), Regulatory Detailed Plan Pejton. Pristina: Municipality of Pristina. https://prishtinaonline.com/uploads/1.qyteza_pejton_13.06-shqip.pdf
Google Scholar

MUNICIPALITY OF PRISTINA (2012), Communal Development Plan 2012-2022. Pristina: Municipality of Pristina. https://kk.rks-gov.net/prishtine/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2018/02/PZHU-_Prishtina.pdf [accessed on: 26.11.2020].
Google Scholar

MUNICIPALITY OF TIRANA, UNLAB (2015), General Local Plan for the Development of Territory, Municipality of Tirana. http://planifikimi.gov.al/index.php?id=732
Google Scholar

NIJKAMP P., BAL, Fr. and MEDDA, Fr. (1998), ‘A Survey of Methods for Sustainable City Planning and Cultural Heritage Management’, Serie Research Memorandum, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:001454739
Google Scholar

NTPA; MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT; ATELIER ALBANIA (2016), National General Plan Albania 2030, NTPA. http://planifikimi.gov.al/index.php?id=ppk_shqiperia&L=2
Google Scholar

PARLIAMENT OF ALBANIA (2018), Law 27/2018 On cultural heritage and museums. https://kultura.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Ligji.nr27-_dt.17-05-2018.pdf
Google Scholar

PARLIAMENT OF KOSOVO (2008), Law 02/88 On Cultural Heritage. https://gzk.rks-gov.net/ActDocumentDetail.aspx?ActID=2533
Google Scholar

RODERS, A. P. and OERS, R. V. (2011), ‘Editorial: bridging cultural heritage and sustainable development’, Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 1 (1), pp. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261111129898
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261111129898

UN (2017), New Urban Agenda, United Nations, Habitat III. https://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/
Google Scholar

UNESCO (1968), Recommendation concerning the preservation of cultural property endangered, Paris: Records of the General Conference of UNESCO Fifteen Session. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13085&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Google Scholar

UNESCO (1976), Recommendation concerning the safeguarding and contemporary role of historic areas, Nairobi: Records of the General Conference of UNESCO Nineteenth Session. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13133&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Google Scholar

UNESCO (1982), World Conference on Cultural Policies: final report, Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000052505
Google Scholar

UNESCO (2019), The UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, Paris: UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/hul/
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Allkja, L., & Dhrami, K. (2021). Territorial governance of cultural heritage through spatial planning in Albania and Kosovo. European Spatial Research and Policy, 28(2), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.03

Issue

Section

Articles