Development of peripheral regions: A quali-quantitative study of the southernmost areas in America and Europe

Rodrigo Kataishi; Dario Musolino; Daniele Bruognolo

doi:10.18778/1231-1952.32.2.06

Authors

Rodrigo Kataishi Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Instituto de Desarrollo Económico e Innovación Department, Fuegia Basket 251 – Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-1528
Dario Musolino Università Bocconi, GREEN (Geography, Resources, Environment, Energy & Networks), Via G. Roentgen 1, 20136 Milano, Italy; Università della Valle d’Aosta, Strada Cappuccini 2A, 11100 Aosta, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-0798
Daniele Bruognolo Università della Valle d’Aosta, Strada Cappuccini 2A, 11100 Aosta, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6541-2053

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.32.2.06

Keywords:

peripheral regions, accessibility, manufacturing, development, location factors, Argentina, Italy

Abstract

This study compares the economic development of Tierra del Fuego (Argentina) and Calabria (Italy), two highly peripheral regions. Despite their remoteness, they exhibit contrasting trajectories: Tierra del Fuego shows industrial growth driven by state-led policies, while Calabria faces stagnation despite EU support. Using a mixed-methods approach (quantitative institutional data and semi-structured direct interviews), we analyse factors influencing these divergent paths. Findings highlight the crucial role of institutional frameworks and sectoral specialisation, challenging the assumption that peripherality inherently hinders development. Remoteness does not necessarily preclude development. We suggest policy and strategic positioning can transform peripheral status into a catalyst for development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AHLGREN, P., JARNEVING, B. and ROUSSEAU, R. (2003), ‘Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (6), pp. 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242

AMEEL, L., FINCH, J. and SALMELA, M. (2015), ‘Introduction: Peripherality and literary urban studies’, [in:] AMEEL, L., FINCH, J. and SALMELA, M. (eds), Literature and the peripheral city, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492883_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492883_1

AMIN, S. (1976), Unequal development: An essay on the social formations of peripheral capitalism, New York: Monthly Review Press.

ARRIGHI, G. (1994), The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times, London: Verso.

BAER, W. (1962), ‘The economics of Prebisch and ECLA’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 10 (2, Part 1), pp. 169-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/449951

BARLÖSIUS, E. (2023), ‘Talking About Social Inequality: Three Concepts of Difference’, sozialpolitik.ch, (1/2023), pp. 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-4019

BAUMGARTNER, D., PÜTZ, M. and SEIDL, I. (2013), ‘What kind of entrepreneurship drives regional development in European non-core regions? A literature review on empirical entrepreneurship research’, European Planning Studies, 21 (8), pp. 1095-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722937

BENTIVOGLI, C., FERRARESI, T., MONTI, P., PANICCIÀ, R. and ROSIGNOLI, S. (2018), ‘Italian regions in global value chains: an input-output approach’, Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers), No. 462, October, Banca d’Italia – Eurosistema. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3429812

BIBER, D., CONRAD, S. and REPPEN, R. (1998), Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489

BLEI, D. M. and LAFFERTY, J. D. (2009), ‘Topic models’, [in:] SRIVASTAVA, A. N. and SAHAMI, M. (eds), Text mining: Classification, clustering, and applications, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 71-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420059458.ch4

BLOMGREN, K. B. and SØRENSEN, A. (1998), ‘Peripherality – factor or feature? Reflections on peripherality in tourism research’, Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4 (4), pp. 319-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199812)4:4<319::AID-PTH134>3.0.CO;2-V

BLOWERS, A. and LEROY, P. (1994), ‘Power, politics and environmental inequality: A theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of «peripheralisation»’, Environmental Politics, 3 (2), pp. 197-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019408414139

BRAUN, V. and CLARKE, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), pp. 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. (2009), Developing Brazil: Overcoming the failure of the Washington Consensus, London: Anthem Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626371323

BUHEJI, M. (2020), ‘Geographic Influence on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spillovers’, Review of Business and Management, 7 (2), pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5296/rbm.v7i2.16677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/rbm.v7i2.16677

CAPELLO, R. and CERISOLA, S. (2020), ‘Concentrated versus Diffused Growth Assets: Agglomeration Economies and Regional Cohesion’, Growth and Change, 51 (4), pp. 1440–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12419

CARDOSO, F. H. and FALETTO, E. (1969), Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina, Santiago: Universidad de Chile.

CENSIS (2023), La classifica Censis delle Università Italiane, Edizione 2023/2024, Rome: Censis.

COPUS, A. (2009), ‘A review of the concept of peripherality and its application to the UK and Scotland’, Scottish Geographical Journal, 125 (1), pp. 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702540902836922

COPUS, A. (2024), ‘Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality’, Journal of Regional Studies, 45 (2), pp. 34-50.

CORBETTA, P. (2015), La ricerca sociale: metodologia e tecniche, III. Le tecniche qualitative (2nd ed.), Bologna: Il Mulino.

CRONE, M. (2012), ‘Re-thinking ‘peripherality’ in the context of a knowledge-intensive, service-dominated economy’, [in:] Regional Development in Northern Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 49-64.

DANIELE, V. and MARANI, U. (2011), ‘Organised crime, the quality of local institutions and FDI in Italy: A panel data analysis’, European Journal of Political Economy, 27 (1), pp. 132–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.04.003

DELUCA, J. P. and KATAISHI, R. E. (2023), La promoción industrial como instrumento central de la economía política y del ejercicio de soberanía en la provincia de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur, Buenos Aires: Universidad de la Defensa.

DI LIDDO, M. and MANENTI, F. (2017), Competizione tra Stati e Corsa alle Risorse: La Geopolitica dell’Artico, Centro Studi Internazionali, 124, Gennaio.

DOCQUIER, F. and RAPOPORT, H. (2012), ‘Globalization, brain drain, and development’, Journal of Economic Literature, 50 (3), pp. 681-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.681

DOS SANTOS, T. (1970), ‘The structure of dependence’, American Economic Review, 60 (2), pp. 231-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216384205.ch-013

EDER, J. (2019), ‘Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda’, International Regional Science Review, 42 (2), pp. 119-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017618764279

ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2024), “Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean”, 2024 (LC/PUB.2024/8-P), Santiago.

EDER, J. and TRIPPL, M. (2019), ‘Innovation in the Periphery: Compensation and Exploitation Strategies’, Growth and Change, 50 (4), pp. 1511-1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12328

EUROSTAT (2025), Living conditions statistics at regional level, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=488652#Highlights [accessed on: 01.09.2025].

EVERT, S. (2005), The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations, Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.

FERDINANDO, V., MARIAROSARIA, A. and LUIGI, F. G. (2023), ‘New development policies for the internal areas of Southern Italy. General principles for the valorization of rural areas in Calabria Region’, Valori e Valutazioni, 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20233308

FISCHER-TAHIR, A. and NAUMANN, M. (eds) (2013), Peripheralization: The making of spatial dependencies, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1

FITJAR, R. D. and RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. (2011), ‘Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway’, European Planning Studies, 19 (4), pp. 555-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548467

FORNES, G. and MENDEZ, A. (2018), The China-Latin America axis: Emerging markets and their role in an increasingly globalised world, Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66721-8

FRANK, A. G. (1966), ‘The Development of Underdevelopment’, Monthly Review, 18 (4), pp. 17-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-018-04-1966-08_3

FRANK, A. G. (1967), Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America, New York: NYU Press.

FRANK, A. G. (1979), ‘Unequal accumulation: Intermediate, semi-peripheral, and sub-imperialist economies’, Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 2 (3), pp. 281-350.

FRIENDLY, M. (2002), ‘Corrgrams: Exploratory displays for correlation matrices’, The American Statistician, 56 (4), pp. 316-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/000313002533

FUNDAR (2023), ‘Diagnóstico del Régimen de Tierra del Fuego’, [in:] HALLAK, J. C., MASCARENHAS, T. B., PEZZARINI, L., BENTIVEGNA, B. and PARK, L. (eds), Diagnóstico del Régimen de Tierra del Fuego, Buenos Aires: FUNDAR.

FURTADO, C. (1964), Development and Underdevelopment, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520319721

GANESAN, S., MALTER, A. J. and RINDFLEISCH, A. (2005), ‘Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development’, Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), pp. 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.44

GEREFFI, G. (1999), ‘A commodity chains framework for analyzing global industries’, IDS Bulletin, 30 (2), pp. 1-9.

GOBIERNO DE TIERRA DEL FUEGO, ANTÁRTIDA E ISLAS DEL ATLÁNTICO SUR (2018), Gestión 2016-2020 del Ordenamiento al Desarrollo. Apertura de Sesiones Legislativas Provincia de Tierra del Fuego, Ushuaia: Gobierno de Tierra del Fuego.

GRABHER, G. (2018), ‘Marginality as strategy: Leveraging peripherality for creativity’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50 (8), pp. 1785-1794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18784021

HALL, C. M., HARRISON, D., WEAVER, D. and WALL, G. (2013), ‘Vanishing peripheries: Does tourism consume places?’, Tourism Recreation Research, 38 (1), pp. 97-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2013.11081730

HIRSCHMAN, A. O. (1958), The strategy of economic development, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

HOJMAN, D. A. and SZEIDL, A. (2008), ‘Core and periphery in networks’, Journal of Economic Theory, 139 (1), pp. 295-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2007.07.007

INDEC (2024), Estadísticas Provinciales, https://www.indec.gob.ar/ [accessed on: 07.2024].

INFOLEG (1972), Ley 19.640: Régimen Especial Fiscal y Aduanero para la Provincia de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur, https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/25000-29999/28185/norma.htm [accessed on: 07.2024].

IPIEC (2024), Estadísticas Económicas de la Provincia de Tierra del Fuego eIAS, https://ipiec.tierradelfuego.gob.ar/estadisticas-economicas-2/ [accessed on: 07.2024].

ISTAT (2019), Movimento turistico in Italia. Anno 2018. Statistiche report, Rome: Istat.

ISTAT (2024), Istat Regions, https://www.istat.it/en/tag/regions/ [accessed on: 07.2024].

JESSOP, B. (2016), The state: Past, present, future, Cambridge: Polity Press.

KATAISHI, R. E. (2016), ‘La industria electrónica de Tierra del Fuego y el dilema de la competitividad: esfuerzos tecnológicos y competencias desde un estudio de caso’, [in:] Lecturas seleccionadas de la XXI Reunión Anual Red Pymes Mercosur, Córdoba, Argentina: Red PyMEs Eds, pp. 20-44.

KATAISHI, R., BRIXNER, C. N., CALÁ, C. D. and NIEMBRO, A. A. (2023), ‘Crisis, resiliencia e innovación en sectores estratégicos: reconfiguraciones en el complejo turístico de Tierra del Fuego’, Revista Tiempo de Gestión, 34 (1), Segundo Semestre, UADER.

KATAISHI, R. and BRIXNER, C. (2024), ‘Importaciones y trayectorias de especialización productiva: un análisis del posicionamiento de Tierra del Fuego en las Cadenas Globales de Valor’, Cuadernos de Investigación Serie Administración, 6, pp. 116-142.

KATAISHI, R. and MORERO, H. (2020), ‘Taxonomies, Technological Opportunities, and Global Value Chains in Developing Countries: a Literature Review and a Conceptual Approach Proposal’, Investigación y Desarrollo, 28 (2), pp. 168-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14482/indes.28.2.330.91

KATAISHI, R. and ORTIZ, M. E. (2024), ‘Configuraciones Institucionales y desarrollo CyT en la Patagonia Sur: Un Estudio Comparado entre Santa Cruz y Tierra del Fuego’, Revista Tiempo de Gestión, 1 (36), pp. 209-230.

KIM, M. (2013), ‘Many roads lead to Rome: Implications of geographic scope as a source of isolating mechanisms’, Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (9), pp. 898-921. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.39

KRUGMAN, P. (1991), ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’, Journal of Political Economy, 99 (3), pp. 483-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261763

KÜHN, M. (2015), ‘Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities’, European Planning Studies, 23 (2), pp. 367-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518

LANG, T. and GÖRMAR, F. (eds) (2019), Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation: Re-thinking Spatial Policies in Europe (1st ed.), Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1190-1_1

LETAIFA, S. and RABEAU, Y. (2013), ‘Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation’, Journal of Business Research, 66 (10), pp. 2071-2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2013.02.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.033

LUHN, H. P. (1958), ‘The automatic creation of literature abstracts’, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2 (2), pp. 159-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.22.0159

MANNING, C. D. and SCHÜTZE, H. (1999), Foundations of statistical natural language processing, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

MCDONALD, C., BUCKLEY, P. J., VOSS, H., CROSS, A. R. and CHEN, L. (2018), ‘Place, space, and foreign direct investment into peripheral cities’, International Business Review, 27 (4), pp. 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.004

MEEKER, B. F. (1984), ‘Networks, Exchange, and Coercion: The Elementary Theory and Its Applications’, [in:] WILLER, D. and ANDERSON, B. (eds), Networks, Exchange, and Coercion: The Elementary Theory and Its Applications, Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2578576

MUSOLINO, D. (2016), ‘L’attrattività percepita di regioni e province del Mezzogiorno per gli investimenti produttivi’, Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, (1), pp. 47-72, Bologna: Il Mulino.

MUSOLINO, D. (2018), ‘The north-south divide in Italy: Reality or perception?’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 25 (1), pp. 29-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.03

MUSOLINO, D. A. and PANUCCIO, P. (2022), ‘Special economic zones planning for sustainable ports: the test case of territorial attractiveness and urban planning in Calabria region’, [in:] International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 72-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10548-7_6

MUSOLINO, D., MEESTER, W. J. and PELLENBARG, P. H. (2020), ‘The mental maps of Italian, German and Dutch entrepreneurs: a comparative perspective’, The Annals of Regional Science, 64 (3), pp. 595-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-019-00912-3

NAMEY, E., GUEST, G., THAIRU, L. and JOHNSON, L. (2008), ‘Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets’, [in:] GUEST, G. and MACQUEEN, K. M. (eds), Handbook for team-based qualitative research, Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira, pp. 137-161.

NOWELL, L. S., NORRIS, J. M., WHITE, D. E. and MOULES, N. J. (2017), ‘Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

OPIE, T. R. (2010), On the Outskirts and Wanting In: How Peripherality Perceptions Shape Individual Engagement in Groups, Ph.D. thesis, New York University, Graduate School of Business Administration, New York.

OPPIDO, S., RAGOZINO, S. and ESPOSITO DE VITA, G. (2023), ‘Peripheral, Marginal, or Non-Core Areas? Setting the Context to Deal with Territorial Inequalities through a Systematic Literature Review’, Sustainability, 15 (13), 10401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310401

PAASI, A. (1995), ‘The social construction of peripherality: The case of Finland and the Finnish-Russian border area’, [in:] Competitive European Peripheries, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 235-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79955-6_12

PERER, A. and SHNEIDERMAN, B. (2008), ‘Integrating statistics and visualization: Case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis’, [in:] Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM, pp. 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357101

PEZZI, M. G. and URSO, G. (2016), ‘Peripheral Areas: Conceptualization and Politics. Introduction and Editorial Note’, Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 6 (1), pp. 1-19.

PREBISCH, R. (1949), El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas, Santiago: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America.

PREBISCH, R. (1952), Theoretical and practical problems of economic growth, Santiago: ECLAC, United Nations.

PREBISCH, R. (1972), International Economics and Development, New York: Academic Press.

RAE, D. (2017), ‘Entrepreneurial learning: Peripherality and connectedness’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23 (3), pp. 486-503. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2016-0132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2016-0132

RIVERA LEÓN, L. and KATAISHI, R. (2010), ‘Collaboration networks for innovation and socio-economic development: European and Latin American perspectives on digital ecosystems research, local readiness, deployment strategies and their policy implications’, [in:] Digital Ecosystems: Third International Conference, OPAALS 2010, Aracuju, Sergipe, Brazil, 22-23 March 2010, Revised Selected Papers 3, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14859-0_1

ROBERTS, A. (2013), ‘Peripheral accumulation in the world economy: A cross-national analysis of the informal economy’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 54 (5-6), pp. 420-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715213519458

RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. (2018), ‘The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11 (1), pp. 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024

ROMANO, S. A., KATAISHI, R. E. and DURÁN, L. (2018), ‘La promoción industrial en Argentina: entramado normativo para el caso de la ley 19.640’, Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 18 (58), pp. 947-976. https://doi.org/10.22136/est20181214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22136/est20181214

ROSTOW, W. W. (1985), ‘The world economy since 1945: A stylized historical analysis’, The Economic History Review, 38 (2), pp. 252-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1985.tb00370.x

SERVILLO, L., RUSSO, A. P., BARBERA, F. and CARROSIO, G. (2016), ‘Inner peripheries: Towards an EU place-based agenda on territorial peripherality’, Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 6 (1), pp. 42-75.

SIBLEY, D. (1986), ‘Persistence or change? Conflicting interpretations of peripheral minorities’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 4 (1), pp. 57-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d040057

STÖHR, W. (1978), Development From Below: The Bottom-Up and Periphery-Inward Development Paradigm. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business. IIR-Discussion Papers No. 4, Vienna: WU Vienna.

STREET, J. H. (1987), ‘The Institutionalist Theory of Economic Development’, Journal of Economic Issues, 21 (4), pp. 1861-1887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1987.11504725

TOYE, J. F. and TOYE, R. (2003), ‘The origins and interpretation of the Prebisch-Singer thesis’, History of Political Economy, 35 (3), pp. 437-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-3-437

WILMSMEIER, G. and MONIOS, J. (2013), ‘Counterbalancing peripherality and concentration: An analysis of the UK container port system’, Maritime Policy & Management, 40 (2), pp. 116-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.756588

WORLD BANK (2024), World Bank Group Open Indicators, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD [accessed on: 07.2024].

ZIESEMER, T. H. (1994), Economic Development and Endogenous Terms-of-Trade Determination: Review and Reinterpretation of the Prebisch-Singer Thesis. MPRA Paper, No. 54864, Munich: University Library of Munich.

ZIPF, G. K. (1949), Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.