The outermost regions of the European Union: From the beginning to the present

Paulo Espinola; Fernanda Cravidão

doi:10.18778/1231-1952.32.2.08

Authors

Paulo Espinola University of Coimbra, Centre of Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning, Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-9600
Fernanda Cravidão University of Coimbra, Centre of Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning, Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-1864

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.32.2.08

Keywords:

OR territories, islands/archipelagos, EU treaties, Cohesion Policy

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to analyse the concept of the outermost regions, which, on the one hand, correspond to areas of the EU located at great distances from Europe and, on the other, promote a positive discrimination between regions by granting specific economic benefits. A literature review and analysis of socio-economic data are the main methods used to achieve the proposed objectives. The research focused on the legal evolution of the ORs in the EU Treaties, the development support programmes under European cohesion policy, and the main indicators that make it possible to characterise the current economic and social situation of these remote areas. From this type of analysis, it was possible to see that the majority of the ORs are still far from the average values of the EU-27, both economically and in terms of the standard of living of their inhabitants, despite the substantial progress that has been made over the last 30 years, as a result of an increasingly consolidated outermost status in European politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABAMUKONG, B. and JOBST, S. (2016), ‘The Social Capital Theory in the Light of a Centre-Periphery Comparison’, International Dialogues on Education, 3 (1), pp. 36−51. https://doi.org/10.53308/ide.v3i1.174
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.53308/ide.v3i1.174

Alberto, D. (2009), ‘Regional Development and Competitiveness: Application of the Triple Helix Model to NUT III Beira Interior Sul’, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, January 2009, http://hdl.handle.net/10400.11/757 [accessed on: 30.04.2024].
Google Scholar

AMARAL, J. B. M. (2022), ‘The creation of the concept of European outermost regions - a fight for human rights!’, [in:] VALENTE, I. M. F. (ed.), Atlantic outermost regions: bridge(es) between the EU and the USA, Editora Mente Aberta, pp. 131−165, https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/112424/1/EUROATLANTICO%2016_E-book%20final.pdf [accessed on: 12.11.2024].
Google Scholar

ASÍN CABRERA, M. A. (2005), ‘La constitución europea y el estatuto jurídico de las regiones ultraperiféricas’, Hacieenda Canaria, 12 (2), pp. 5−23, https://www3.gobiernodecanarias.org/tributos/atc/estatico/info_tributaria/revista/Revista12/RevistaHC_12_1.pdf [accessed on: 07.10.2024].
Google Scholar

ARAGÓN, A. and HERNÁNDEZ ARTEGA, G. M. (2022), ‘The creation of the concept of European outermost regions - a fight for human rights!’, [in:] VALENTE, I. M. F. (ed.), Atlantic outermost regions: bridge(es) between the EU and the USA, Editora Mente Aberta, pp. 39−56, https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/112424/1/EUROATLANTICO%2016_E-book%20final.pdf [accessed on: 12.11.2024].
Google Scholar

BALAS, A. (2024), ‘European Union’s Use of the Outermost Regions (Ors) and the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) to Promote Its Geopolitical Interests in the Atlantic, Caribbean, Indian, and Pacific Regions’, [in:] LIKA, L. and RIGA, D. (eds), EU Geopolitical Actorness in a Changing World, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 217−241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81160-9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81160-9_9

BOURDIN, S., HERMET, F. and JEAN-PIERRE, P. (2024), ’Les regions ultrapériphérique de L`Union européenne son-elles toujours en retard de development’, Revue Économique, 75 (3), pp. 579−599. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/reco.753.0579
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.753.0579

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2022), Overview of the outermost regions – assets, challenges and opportunities, COM 198 final, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/themes/outermost-regions/rup-2022/comm-rup-2022-glance_en.pdf [accessed on: 02.05.2025].
Google Scholar

EURISLES (2002), Off the coast of Europe. European construction and the problem of the islands, CPMR – Islands Commission. https://europeansmallislands.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/off-the-coast-of-europe.pdf [accessed on: 14.11.2024].
Google Scholar

FORNIELES GIL, A. (2008), ‘El principio de proporcionalidad y la fiscalidad de las regiones ultraperiférica’, Hacieenda Canaria, 22 (1), pp. 235−273, https://www3.gobiernodecanarias.org/tributos/atc/estatico/info_tributaria/revista/Revista22/RevistaHC-22_13.pdf [accessed on: 12.10.2024].
Google Scholar

FONSECA, H. (2023), ‘The Outermost Regions and the Europe Union’s presence in the World’, Debater a Europa, 26/27, pp. 183−193. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_26/27_9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_26/27_9

FONTAINE, I. and HERMET, F. (2025), ‘L‘évolution du niveau de développement à Mayotte: Une mesure à partir de données satellitaires de luminosité nocture’, Revue d’Économique Régionale & Urbaine, 2025/2, pp. 255−278. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/reru.252.0255
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.252.0255

FREITAS, T. (2010), ‘Development of the EU’s Outermost Regions’, Library of the European Parliment, 092, pp. 1−8, https://www.academia.edu/3825218/Development_of_EUs_Outermost_Regions [accessed on: 18.04.2025].
Google Scholar

FRIEDMAN, J. (1966), Regional Development Policy: a case study of Venezuela, New York: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

FRIEDMAN, J. (1972), ‘General Theory of Polarised Development’, [in:] HANSEN, N. (ed.), Growth Centres in Regional Economic Development, New York: Free Press, pp. 82−107.
Google Scholar

HERMET, F., HOARAU, J. P. and LACOUR, C. (2025), ‘Introduction – Periphericity and ultraperiphericity in the context of major crises: distance is coming back’, Revue d´Économie Régionale & Urbaine, 2025-2, pp. 167−182, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/reru.252.0167
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.252.0167

LIBERATO, R. (2008), ‘Revisiting the models and theories of regional analysis’, Caderno de Geografia, 18 (29), pp. 127−136.
Google Scholar

LOPES, N. S. (2022), ‘The status of Outermost Region and its importance for the European Union: the Azorean case’, Portuguese Journal of Political Science, 18, pp. 105−120. https://doi.org/10.59071/2795-4765.RPCP2022.18/pp.105-120
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.59071/2795-4765.RPCP2022.18/pp.105-120

NASCIMENTO, E. and VALENTE, I. (2024), ‘Outermost regions of the European Union (ORs)’, [in:] VALENTE, I. (ed.), The Insular dimension of Europe and the islands in the European Union: heteronomy, autonomy and sub-sovereignt, EURILHAS, pp. 75−81. https://doi.org/10.29327/5402055
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.29327/5402055

OLIVIER, A. (2025), ‘Les régions ultrapérifiques, territoires européens au coeur des océans’, Toute l´europe: comprende L´Europe, https://www.touteleurope.eu/l-europe-en-region/les-regions-ultraperipheriques-territoires-europeens-au-coeur-des-oceans/ [accessed on: 02.05.2025].
Google Scholar

OULAHAL, R. (2022), ‘Education in the French Outermost Regions: Interculturation as a basis for a necessary work of memory?’, Revista Lusófona de Educação, 55, pp. 127−137. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle55.08
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle55.08

PERROT, D. (2021), ‘Insularity and Law: Diversity and Changeability of Islands`Statuses – The Example of French Outermost Regions in French and EU Law Systems’, Liverpool Law Review, 42, pp. 71−85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09263-y
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09263-y

PORTUGUÉS CARRILLO, C. and ZAFRA DÍAZ, J. (2014), ‘La actualización del marco normativo europeo específico para la ultraperiferia’, [in:] CABRERA, M. A. and GODENAU, D. (eds), Movilidad y Gran Vencidad en las Regiones Ultraperiféricas de la Unión Europea, Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Cabildo Insular de Tenerife, pp. 17−38.
Google Scholar

RUP PLUS (2008), Co-operation between the outermost regions: The regional framework operation. European Commission - Regional Policy, https://www.cp-omr.eu/pt/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/A-coopera%C3%A7%C3%A3o-entre-as-Regi%C3%B5es-Ultraperif%C3%A9ricas-A-Opera%C3%A7%C3%A3o-Quadro-Regional-RUP-plus-PT.pdf [accessed on: 13.11.2024].
Google Scholar

SILVA, G. V., PORTO, J., SANTOS, P. and DHENIN, M. (2016), ‘La géopolitique de l´‘Union Européenne por les régions ultrapériphérique: Assimilation, fragmentation et rôle de la Guyane française dasn son contexte régional’, Confins, 26, pp. 1−19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/confins.10658
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/confins.10658

TEMPORAL, F. (2015), ‘Les régions ultrapériphériques’, L´Éurope en formation, 377 (3), pp. 61−78. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/eufor.377.0061
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/eufor.377.0061

VALENTE, I. (2009), ‘The Portuguese outermost regions: political discourse and the regional press’, Revista Mneme, 10 (26), pp. 39−57. https://periodicos.ufrn.br/mneme/article/view/7 [accessed on: 10.11.2024].
Google Scholar

VALENTE, I. (2013), ‘The Construction of a Concept – Outermost Region’, Revista Debater Europa, 8, pp. 111−151. https://www.academia.edu/6859093/A_Constru%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_um_conceito_Regi%C3%A3o_Ultraperif%C3%A9rica [accessed on: 10.11.2024].
Google Scholar

Valente, I. (2015), ‘The Atlantic outermost regions, the furthest frontiers of Europe’, Debater e Europa, 12, pp. 75−84. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_12_4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_12_4

VALENTE, I. (2016), ‘Portugal, regional policy and the outermost regions’, Revista Debater a Europa, 15, pp. 175−196. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_15_10
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_15_10

WALLERSTEIN, I. (1974), ‘The rise and fall of the world Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16 (4), pp. 387−415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520