Difficulties in Translating Xenophon’s Fictional Correspondence into Polish — an Analysis of Selected Issues

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.28.14

Keywords:

Pseudo-Ksenophon, fictional letters, translation, Attic Greek, dualis

Abstract

The fictional correspondence of Xenophon has survived to our times in a fragmentary form, thanks to Stobaeus, whose Anthology contains excerpts from the Socratic letters. This correspondence is also part of the collection Socratis et Socraticorum Epistolae. Translating these texts poses significant challenges due to the peculiarities of the epistolary language, particularly its Atticization, as well as the presence of allusions and quotations that reflect the authors’ intellectual processes. The translator’s task, therefore, is to unveil the implicit knowledge embedded in the original text for the reader. This raises the question of what translation techniques should be employed to achieve this. Is a footnote always the only solution? How can one create a comprehensible and faithful translation for the modern reader of texts rooted in the Second Sophistic movement, which reference the realities of the classical era and Socratic thought – texts marked by a third culture? 

The article pays special attention to the Greek particle δέ, seen as a characteristic element of Attic speech, particularly in Xenophon’s language, as well as the dualis form. 

Author Biography

Anna Marchewka, Uniwersytet Gdański

Dr hab. Anna Marchewka, prof. UG – classical philologist, Hellenist; associate professor; Deputy Director for Student Affairs and Education at the Institute of Classical and Slavonic Studies (University of Gdansk). Her research focuses mainly on the Greek literature of the archaic and classical period, above all on the Homeric epics, on the Histories of Herodotus, and on the works of Xenophon. Selected publications: Homerycki język Herodota (Homeric Language of Herodotus), Gdańsk 2002; Słowo i gest. Herodotowa sztuka portretowania (Word and Gesture. Herodotus’ Art of Portrayal), Gdańsk 2010; Ktezjasz z Knidos: fragmenty w Excerpta Constantiniana (Ctesias of Cnidus: Fragments in Excerpta Constantiniana), Gdańsk 2019; Socratis et socraticorum epistolae – (nie)jednolitość zbioru (Socratis et socraticorum epistolae: the (non)uniformity of collection), “Roczniki Humanistyczne” 71, 3 (2023).

References

Baümlein, W. (1861). Untersuchungen über griechische Partikeln. Stuttgart: Verlag der J.B. Metzlerschen Buchhandlung.
Google Scholar

Bentley, R. (1857). Abhandlungen über die Briefe des Phalaris, Themistocles, Socrates, Eurypides und über die Fabeln des Aesops. Deutsch von W. Ribbeck. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
Google Scholar

Denniston, J.D. (1954). The Greek Particles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Goodell, D. (1902). A School Grammar of Attic Greek. New York: Appleton.
Google Scholar

Hejwowski, K. (2006). Kognitywno-komunikacyjna teoria przekładu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Hercher, R. (ed.). (1873). Epistolographi Graeci. Parisiis: Editore Ambrosio Firmin Didot.
Google Scholar

Kielar, B.Z. (2013). Zarys translatoryki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Kulturologii i Lingwistyki Antropocentrycznej Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar

Kognitywne podstawy języka i językoznawstwa. (2001). E. Tabakowska (red.). Kraków: Universitas.
Google Scholar

Köhler, L. (ed.) (1928). Die Briefe des Sokrates und der Sokratiker. Leipzig: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Google Scholar

Lipiński, K. (2000). Vademecum tłumacza. Kraków: Wydawnictwo. Idea.
Google Scholar

Obens, G. (1912). Qua aetate „Socratis et Socraticorum epistolae”, quae dicuntur, scriptae sint. Monasterium Guestfalorum: Typografeus Aschendorffianus.
Google Scholar

Schwyzer, E. (1950). Griechische Grammatik. Bd. 1. A. Debrunner (ed.). München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Google Scholar

Sobotka, P. (2014). Partykuły greckie – pochodzenie, klasyfikacja i wybrane problemy opisu. W: K. Kleszczowa, A. Szczepanek (red.). Wyrażenia funkcjonalne w perspektywie diachronicznej, synchronicznej i porównawczej. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. 133–167.
Google Scholar

Socratis quae feruntur epistolae. (1997). J.-F. Borkowski (red.). Stuttgart–Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
Google Scholar

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Marchewka, A. (2025). Difficulties in Translating Xenophon’s Fictional Correspondence into Polish — an Analysis of Selected Issues. Collectanea Philologica, (28), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.28.14