Virgilian Reception in the „Sulpiciae Conquestio”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.28.09Słowa kluczowe:
Wergiliusz, Sulpiciae Conquestio, Epigrammata Bobiensia, August, intertekstualnośćAbstrakt
The Sulpiciae Conquestio that has been transmitted as part of the Epigrammata Bobiensia is a curious work, one that is replete with intertextual allusions to Virgil’s Aeneid in particular. Close examination of the course of its argument will reveal that its author offers reflections on Virgil’s depiction of the place of war and peace in Roman history, with emphasis on the point that peace can be enervating and corrosive to the Roman polity. The Conquestio thus stands forth as a late Flavian Age commentary on the problems that may result from such seemingly successful initiatives as the implementation of the Pax Augusta.
Bibliografia
Astin, A. (1978). Cato the Censor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Baehrens, E. (1879). Poetae Latini Minores. Vol. V. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar
Baldry, H. (1952). Who Invented the Golden Age?. The Classical Quarterly 2. 83–92.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800007667
Ballaira, G. (1975). A proposito della Sulpiciae Conquestio (Epigr. Bob. 37). Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 103. 399–402.
Google Scholar
Ballanti, A. (1954). Documenti sull’opposizione degli intellettuali a Domiziano. Annali della Facoltà de Letttere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 4. 75–95.
Google Scholar
Boas, H. (1938). Aeneas’ Arrival in Latium. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers.
Google Scholar
Butrica, J. (2000). Sulpicia’s Complaint: on the State of the Nation and the Age of Domitian, Introduction (n.p.), curculio.org/Sulpiciae.
Google Scholar
Butrica, J. (2006). The Fabella of Sulpicia (Epigrammata Bobiensia 37). Phoenix 60. 70–121.
Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book Five, Lines 772-1104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Charles, M., Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2010). The Sexual Hypocrisy of Domitian (Suet., Dom. 8,3). L’Antiquité Classique 79. 173–187. https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.2010.3772
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.2010.3988
Conway, R. (1935). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Cooley, A. (2016). Italy during the High Empire, from the Flavians to Diocletian. In: A. Cooley, (ed.). A Companion to Roman Italy. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 121–132.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993125.ch7
Dewald, C., Munson, R. (2022). Herodotus: Histories Book 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Epigrammata Bobiensia (1963). W. Speyer (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1975). Utopias of the Classical World. London: Thames & Hudson.
Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. (n.d.). Why Does Virgil’s Victorious Venus Vanish?. Hermathena. Forthcoming.
Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. (2010). Nivales Socii: Caesar, Mamurra, and the Snow of Catullus c. 57. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 96. 101–110.
Google Scholar
Galimberti, A. (2016). The Emperor Domitian. In: A. Zissos (ed.). A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 92–108.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118878149.ch5
Garani, M. (2022). Keep Up the Good Work: (Don’t) Do It like Ovid (Sen. QNat. 3.27-30). In: K. Volk, G.D. Willliams (eds.). Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145–163.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197610336.003.0008
Gardner, H. (2023). Elegiac Revaluations of the Golden Age: Saturn’s Exile in Vergil and Tibullus. In: A. Keith, M.Y. Myers (eds.). Vergil and Elegy. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press. 63–81.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487547998-006
Grainger, G. (2004). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of AD 96–99. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203218075
Green, C. (2007). Roman Religion and the Cult of Diana at Aricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Hockings, T. (2021). A Reward for Your Toil: Textual Notes on ‘Sulpicia’ (Epigr. Bob. 37). Mnemosyne 74. 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10103
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10103
Horatius (2008). Opera. D. Shackleton Bailey (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2013). Virgil, Aeneid . A Commentary. Vol. 2: Commentary and Appendices. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229912
Jędrzejczak, D. (2009). Sulpicia as a Woman-Singer. Latomus 68. 693–695.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00354.x
Jones, B. (1993). The Emperor Domitian. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300916
Jones, B. (2011). Suetonius: Domitian. London: Bristol Classical Press.
Google Scholar
Kerrigan, C. (2020). Virgil’s Map: Geography, Empire, and the Georgics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350151536
Kuijper, D. (1965). Tertius Cato – Trabe Prolapsus. Mnemosyne 18. 155–180.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852565X00151
Levick, B. (1982). Domitian and the Provinces. Latomus 41. 50–73.
Google Scholar
Littlewood, R. (2006). A Commentary on Ovid, Fasti, Book 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Luke, T. (2014). Ushering in a New Republic: Theologies of Arrival at Rome in the First Century B.C.E. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6265337
Lyne, R. (1987). Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Macara Francis, C. (2007). Martial Epigrammata, Book X: A Commentary. Doctoral Thesis, Otago.
Google Scholar
Merriam, C. (1991). The Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 84. 303–305.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4350812
Oakley, S. (1998). A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1992). Other Remarks on the Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 86. 89–95.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4351255
Perkell, C. (2002). The Golden Age and Its Contradictions in the Poetry of Vergil. Vergilius 48. 3–39.
Google Scholar
Pontiggia, L. (2021). The Return of Jupiter: Aeneid 1, Punica 1, and Silius’ Post-Lucanian Theology. In: R. Marks, M. Mogetta (eds.). Domitian’s Rome and the Augustan Legacy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 158–170.
Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992). Sulpicia the Satirist. The Classical World 86. 125–140.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4351257
Rossi, A. (2004). Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17687
Sherwin-White, A. (1966). The Letters of Pliny: a Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Straub, C. (2019). Revisiting the Acorn-Eater: The Case of the Arkadians in Greek Antiquity. In: M. McWilliams (2020). Seeds: Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery 2018. London: Prospect Books.
Google Scholar
Thiele, G. (1916). Die Poesie unter Domitian. Hermes 51. 223–260.
Google Scholar
Traina, A. (2017). Virgilio: l’utopia e la storia: Il libro XII dell’Eneide e antologia dell’opere. Bologna: Pátron Editore.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29487153
Vergilius (2019). Opera. G. Conte (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982). The Golden Age and Sin in Augustan Ideology. Past & Present 95. 19–36.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/past/95.1.19
Zetzel, J. (1989). Romane Memento: Justice and Judgment in Aeneid 6. Transactions of the American Philological Association 119. 263–284.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/284275
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.


