Virgilian Reception in the „Sulpiciae Conquestio”

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.28.09

Słowa kluczowe:

Wergiliusz, Sulpiciae Conquestio, Epigrammata Bobiensia, August, intertekstualność

Abstrakt

The Sulpiciae Conquestio that has been transmitted as part of the Epigrammata Bobiensia is a curious work, one that is replete with intertextual allusions to Virgil’s Aeneid in particular. Close examination of the course of its argument will reveal that its author offers reflections on Virgil’s depiction of the place of war and peace in Roman history, with emphasis on the point that peace can be enervating and corrosive to the Roman polity. The Conquestio thus stands forth as a late Flavian Age commentary on the problems that may result from such seemingly successful initiatives as the implementation of the Pax Augusta.

Biogram autora

Lee Fratantuono - National University of Ireland-Maynooth

Prof. Lee Fratantuono – classical philologist and ancient historian, with degrees in classics from Fordham, Boston College, and Holy Cross. He is the author of some twenty books and hundred articles on Greek and Latin studies, especially Augustan poetry and Roman imperial history. 

Bibliografia

Astin, A. (1978). Cato the Censor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Baehrens, E. (1879). Poetae Latini Minores. Vol. V. Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Baldry, H. (1952). Who Invented the Golden Age?. The Classical Quarterly 2. 83–92.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800007667

Ballaira, G. (1975). A proposito della Sulpiciae Conquestio (Epigr. Bob. 37). Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 103. 399–402.
Google Scholar

Ballanti, A. (1954). Documenti sull’opposizione degli intellettuali a Domiziano. Annali della Facoltà de Letttere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 4. 75–95.
Google Scholar

Boas, H. (1938). Aeneas’ Arrival in Latium. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers.
Google Scholar

Butrica, J. (2000). Sulpicia’s Complaint: on the State of the Nation and the Age of Domitian, Introduction (n.p.), curculio.org/Sulpiciae.
Google Scholar

Butrica, J. (2006). The Fabella of Sulpicia (Epigrammata Bobiensia 37). Phoenix 60. 70–121.
Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book Five, Lines 772-1104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Charles, M., Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2010). The Sexual Hypocrisy of Domitian (Suet., Dom. 8,3). L’Antiquité Classique 79. 173–187. https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.2010.3772
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.2010.3988

Conway, R. (1935). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Cooley, A. (2016). Italy during the High Empire, from the Flavians to Diocletian. In: A. Cooley, (ed.). A Companion to Roman Italy. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 121–132.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993125.ch7

Dewald, C., Munson, R. (2022). Herodotus: Histories Book 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Epigrammata Bobiensia (1963). W. Speyer (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. (1975). Utopias of the Classical World. London: Thames & Hudson.
Google Scholar

Fratantuono, L. (n.d.). Why Does Virgil’s Victorious Venus Vanish?. Hermathena. Forthcoming.
Google Scholar

Fratantuono, L. (2010). Nivales Socii: Caesar, Mamurra, and the Snow of Catullus c. 57. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 96. 101–110.
Google Scholar

Galimberti, A. (2016). The Emperor Domitian. In: A. Zissos (ed.). A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 92–108.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118878149.ch5

Garani, M. (2022). Keep Up the Good Work: (Don’t) Do It like Ovid (Sen. QNat. 3.27-30). In: K. Volk, G.D. Willliams (eds.). Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145–163.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197610336.003.0008

Gardner, H. (2023). Elegiac Revaluations of the Golden Age: Saturn’s Exile in Vergil and Tibullus. In: A. Keith, M.Y. Myers (eds.). Vergil and Elegy. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press. 63–81.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487547998-006

Grainger, G. (2004). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of AD 96–99. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203218075

Green, C. (2007). Roman Religion and the Cult of Diana at Aricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Hockings, T. (2021). A Reward for Your Toil: Textual Notes on ‘Sulpicia’ (Epigr. Bob. 37). Mnemosyne 74. 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10103
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10103

Horatius (2008). Opera. D. Shackleton Bailey (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2013). Virgil, Aeneid . A Commentary. Vol. 2: Commentary and Appendices. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229912

Jędrzejczak, D. (2009). Sulpicia as a Woman-Singer. Latomus 68. 693–695.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00354.x

Jones, B. (1993). The Emperor Domitian. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300916

Jones, B. (2011). Suetonius: Domitian. London: Bristol Classical Press.
Google Scholar

Kerrigan, C. (2020). Virgil’s Map: Geography, Empire, and the Georgics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350151536

Kuijper, D. (1965). Tertius Cato – Trabe Prolapsus. Mnemosyne 18. 155–180.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852565X00151

Levick, B. (1982). Domitian and the Provinces. Latomus 41. 50–73.
Google Scholar

Littlewood, R. (2006). A Commentary on Ovid, Fasti, Book 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Luke, T. (2014). Ushering in a New Republic: Theologies of Arrival at Rome in the First Century B.C.E. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6265337

Lyne, R. (1987). Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Macara Francis, C. (2007). Martial Epigrammata, Book X: A Commentary. Doctoral Thesis, Otago.
Google Scholar

Merriam, C. (1991). The Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 84. 303–305.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4350812

Oakley, S. (1998). A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Parker, H. (1992). Other Remarks on the Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 86. 89–95.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4351255

Perkell, C. (2002). The Golden Age and Its Contradictions in the Poetry of Vergil. Vergilius 48. 3–39.
Google Scholar

Pontiggia, L. (2021). The Return of Jupiter: Aeneid 1, Punica 1, and Silius’ Post-Lucanian Theology. In: R. Marks, M. Mogetta (eds.). Domitian’s Rome and the Augustan Legacy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 158–170.
Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (1992). Sulpicia the Satirist. The Classical World 86. 125–140.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4351257

Rossi, A. (2004). Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17687

Sherwin-White, A. (1966). The Letters of Pliny: a Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Straub, C. (2019). Revisiting the Acorn-Eater: The Case of the Arkadians in Greek Antiquity. In: M. McWilliams (2020). Seeds: Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery 2018. London: Prospect Books.
Google Scholar

Thiele, G. (1916). Die Poesie unter Domitian. Hermes 51. 223–260.
Google Scholar

Traina, A. (2017). Virgilio: l’utopia e la storia: Il libro XII dell’Eneide e antologia dell’opere. Bologna: Pátron Editore.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29487153

Vergilius (2019). Opera. G. Conte (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982). The Golden Age and Sin in Augustan Ideology. Past & Present 95. 19–36.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/past/95.1.19

Zetzel, J. (1989). Romane Memento: Justice and Judgment in Aeneid 6. Transactions of the American Philological Association 119. 263–284.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/284275

Opublikowane

2025-10-30

Jak cytować

Fratantuono, L. (2025). Virgilian Reception in the „Sulpiciae Conquestio”. Collectanea Philologica, (28), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.28.09