Miłość i poezja w Elegii 2.30 Sekstusa Propercjusza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.24.04Słowa kluczowe:
Propercjusz, elegia rzymska, mitologiaAbstrakt
Elegy 2.30 has been considered to be one of Propertius’ most difficult poems due to its complicated sequence of thought and distant associations noticeable in the discourse, which was often the reason for dividing the text into two separate poems. The article is an interpretative proposal aimed at demonstrating the integrity of 2.30, which was obtained by the poet by combining the concept of love with the concept of love poetry, as well as by using subtly constructed mythological references.
Bibliografia
Butler-Barber (1933). The Elegies of Propertius. Edited with an introduction and commentary by H.E. Butler, E.A. Barber. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Camps, W.A. (1967). Propertius, Elegies, Book II. Edited by W.A. Camps. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (repr. 1985).
Enk, P.J. (1962). Sexti Properti Elegiarum liber secundus cum prolegomenis, notis criticis, commentario exegetico. Edidit P.J. Enk, vol. I–II. Leiden: In Aedibus A.W. Sijthoff.
Fedeli, P. (1984). Sexti Properti elegiarum libri IV. Edidit Paolo Fedeli Stuttgart: Teubner.
Fedeli, P. (1985). Properzio, Il Libro Terzo delle Elegie. Introduzione testo e commento di Paolo Fedeli. Bari: Adriatica Editrice.
Helm, R. (1965). Properz, Gedichte, lateinisch und deutsch von R. Helm. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112572924
Richardson, L.N.Jr. (1977). Propertius, Elegies I–IV. Edited with introduction and commentary by L. Richardson, Jr. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Rothstein, M. (1898). Die Elegien des Sextus Propertius. Erklärt von Max Rothstein, 1. Teil: Erstes und zweites Buch. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung (2Berlin 1920).
Babnis, T. (2017). „Augustan poets on the Roman-Parthian treaty of 20 BC”. Classica Cracoviensia 20. 5–44 https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.20.2017.20.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.20.2017.20.01
Babnis, T. (2018). „Sive aliquid Augustus parcet Eois. Wschodnia polityka Rzymu w poezji Propercjusza”.
Roczniki Humanistyczne 66, z. 3. 9–26 https://doi.org/10.18290/rh.2018.66.3-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh.2018.66.3-1
Benediktson, D.Th. (1982). Studies in the Use of Mythology by the Roman Elegists. Diss. Austin: University of Texas.
Benediktson, D.Th. (1986). Catullus 58B defended. Mnemosyne Fourth Series 39. 305–312 https://doi.org/10.1163/156852586X00455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852586X00455
Bobrowski, A. (1997). Mitologia w rzymskiej elegii i liryce miłosnej okresu augustowskiego. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Butrica, J.L. (1984). The Manuscript Tradition of Propertius. Toronto–Buffalo–London: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442632776
Cairns, F. (1971). „Propertius, 2.30 A and B”. The Classical Quarterly. 21. 204–213 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800028950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800028950
Cairns, F. (2006). Sextus Propertius. The Augustan elegist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camps, W.A. (1964) „Propertiana”. The Classical Review 14. 6–9 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00217903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00217903
Camps, W.A. (1979). „L. Richardson, Jr., Propertius, Elegies I–IV” [Review]. The Classical Review NS 29. 37–39 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00230254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00230254
Commager, S. (1974). A Prolegomenon to Propertius. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Kocur, M. (2005). We władzy teatru. Aktorzy i widzowie w antycznym Rzymie. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
La Penna, A. (1977). L’integrazione difficile. Un profilo di Properzio. Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore.
Landels, J.G. (2003). Muzyka starożytnej Grecji i Rzymu, przeł. M. Kaziński. Kraków: Homini (I wyd. ang.: Music in Ancient Greece and Rome. London 1999: Routledge).
Lefèvre, E. (1966). Propertius ludibundus. Elemente des Humors in seinen Elegien. Heidelberg: Winter.
Lieberg, G. (1969). Die Mythologie des Properz in der Forschung und Idealisierung Cynthias. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 112. 311–347.
Luck, G. (1962). Beiträge zum Text der Römischen Elegiker. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 105. 337–351.
Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1979). „Servitium Amoris”. The Classical Quarterly 29. 117–130 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800035229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800035229
MacKay, L.A. (1937). „Propertius II, 30 Quo fugis a demens”. The Classical Journal 33. 163–164.
Maltby, R. (2006). Major Themes and Motifs in Propertius’ Love Poetry. W: Günther, H.-Ch. (red.). Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 147–181.
Murgia, Ch.E. (2000). The Division of Propertius 2. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 45. 147–242 https://doi.org/10.2307/40236186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40236186
Nilsson, N.-O. (1947). „Zur Erklärung von Properz II 30”. Eranos 45. 37–58.
Reinhard, T. (2006). Propertius and Rhetoric. W: Günther, H.-Ch. (red.). Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 199–216 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_010
Syndikus, H.P. (2006). The Second Book. W: Günther, H.-Ch. (red.). Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 245–318 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404835_012
Whitaker, R. (1983). Myth and Personal Experience in Roman Love Elegy. A Study in Poetic Technique. Göttingen 1983: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666251740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666251740
Williams, G. (1980). Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Jak cytować
