The American Dream and American Greed in Fanny Fern’s Ruth Hall: Sentimental and Satirical Christian Discourse in the Popular Domestic Tale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2353-6098.3.11Keywords:
domesticity, literary marketplace, sentimentality, social classAbstract
Although Fanny Fern’s Ruth Hall: A Domestic Tale of the Present Time originally was a widely popular book in the nineteenth century, Fern and Ruth Hall were criticized after readers learned about the similarities among Fern’s life and book. Contemporary critics have recovered Ruth Hall from the literary margins and situated Ruth’s story in the context of the popular American dream story while emphasizing the book’s satirical elements. Reexamining the novel’s originally popular sentimental elements alongside the novel’s more recently popular satirical elements expands the literary critical focus from Ruth’s sentimental struggles and Fern’s satirical accomplishments to Ruth Hall’s equally important critique of American greed, especially among wealthy and socially-conscious Christians.
References
Adams, Florence Bannard. Fanny Fern, or a Pair of Flaming Shoes. West Trenton: Hermitage P, 1966. Print.
Adams, James Truslow. The Epic of America. Boston: Little, 1935. Print.
Allibone, S. Austin. A Critical Dictionary of English Literature and British and American Authors Living and Deceased from the Earliest Accounts to the Latter Half of the Nineteenth Century. 1872. Vol. 2. Detroit: Gale, 1965. Print.
Baym, Nina. Woman’s Fiction: A Guide to Novels by and about Women in America, 1820-1870. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1978. Print.
Berlant, Lauren. “The Female Woman: Fanny Fern and the Form of Sentiment.” American Literary History 3.3 (1991): 429-54. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/3.3.429
Cohen, Lara Langer. “Mediums of Exchange: Fanny Fern‘s Unoriginality.” ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance 55.1 (2009): 59-95. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.0.0034
Cullen, Jim. The American Dream: A Short History of an Idea That Shaped a Nation. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2003. Print.
Derby, J. C. Fifty Years among Authors, Books and Publishers. New York: Carleton, 1884. Print.
Fatout, Paul. “Yarning in the Eighteen Fifties.” American Scholar 3 (1934): 281-93. Print.
Fern, Fanny. Ruth Hall: A Domestic Tale of the Present Time. Ed. Susan Belasco Smith. New York: Penguin, 1997. Print.
Gunn, Robert. “‘How I Look’: Fanny Fern and the Strategy of Pseudonymity.” Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers 27.1 (2010): 23-42. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5250/legacy.27.1.23
Grasso, Linda. “Anger in the House: Fanny Fern‘s Ruth Hall and the Redrawing of Emotional Boundaries in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America.” Studies in the American Renaissance. Ed. Joel Myerson. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1995. 251-61. Print.
Gura, Philip F. “Poe, Hawthorne, and One of Those ‘Scribbling Women.’” Gettysburg Review 6.1 (1993): 38-45. Print.
Harer, Dietrich. “Now You See Me, Now You Don‘t: Fanny Fern‘s Private Theatricals in Ruth Hall; A Domestic Tale of the Present Time (1854).” COPAS: Current Objectives of Postgraduate American Studies 1 (2000): 1-8. Web. 6 Feb. 2015.
Harris, Susan K. “Inscribing and Defining: The Many Voices of Fanny Fern‘s Ruth Hall.” Style 22.4 (1988): 612-27. Print.
Hart, James D. The Popular Book. New York: Oxford UP, 1950. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520327078
Hartnett, Stephen. “Fanny Fern‘s 1855 Ruth Hall, The Cheerful Brutality of Capitalism, & The Irony of Sentimental Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 88.1 (2002): 1-18. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384356
Hearn, Charles R. The American Dream in the Great Depression. Westport: Greenwood P, 1977. Print.
Hiatt, Mary P. “Ruth Hall: The Psychological Fact of Fiction.” Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 11.1-2 (1990): 35-46. Print.
The Holy Bible, New International Version. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984. Print.
Huf, Linda. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Woman: The Writer as Heroine in American Literature. New York: Ungar, 1983. Print.
Kelley, Mary. Private Woman, Public Stage: Literary Domesticity in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 2002. Print.
Larson, Jennifer. “Renovating Domesticity in Ruth Hall, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, and Our Nig.” Women’s Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 38.5 (2009): 538-58. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00497870902952957
Long, Elizabeth. The American Dream and the Popular Novel. Boston: Routledge, 1985. Print.
McGinnis, Patricia I. “Fanny Fern, American Novelist.” Biblion: The University Library Journal: State University of New York at Albany 2 (1969): 2-37. Print.
The National Era 9.419 (11 Jan. 1855): 7. Print.
The National Era 9.431 (5 Apr. 1855): 55. Print.
Newberry, Frederick. “Male Doctors and Female Illness in American Woman‘s Fiction, 1850- 1900.” Separate Spheres No More; Gender Convergence in American Literature, 1830- 1930. Ed. Monika M. Elbert. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2000. 143-57. Print.
Newbury, Michael. Figuring Authorship in Antebellum America. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997.
Papashvily, Helen. All the Happy Endings: A Study of the Domestic Novel in America, the Women Who Write It, the Women Who Read It, in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Harper, 1956. Print.
Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” Toward an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Rayna R. Reiter. New York: Monthly Review P: 1975. 157-210. Print.
Ruth Hall. Advertisement. Boston Daily Evening Transcript (16 Dec. 1854): 2. Print.
Sánchez, María C. “Re-Possessing Individualism in Fanny Fern‘s Ruth Hall.” Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory 56.4 (2000): 25-56. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2000.0017
Smith, Susan Belasco. Introduction. Ruth Hall: A Domestic Tale of the Present Time. New York: Penguin, 1997. xv-xlv. Print.
Stanton, Elizabeth Cady, and Lucretia Mott. “Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions, Seneca Falls.” The Bedford Anthology of World Literature: The Nineteenth Century, 1800-1900. Ed. Paul Davis et al. Boston: Bedford, 2003: 827-30. Print.
Askeland, Lori. “‘Has a Mother a Right to Her Children?’: Fanny Fern‘s Urban Domesticity and the ‘Birth’ of Foster Care and Adoption in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America.” A/B: Auto/Biography Studies 18.2 (2003): 171-95. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2003.10815303
Tompkins, Jane. “Sentimental Power: Uncle Tom’s Cabin and the Politics of Literary History.” The Cultural Work of American Fiction, 1790-1860. New York: Oxford UP, 1985. 122-46. Print.
Tonkovich, Nicole. Domesticity with a Difference: The Nonfiction of Catharine Beecher, Sarah J. Hale, Fanny Fern, and Margaret Fuller. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 1997. Print.
Walker, Nancy A. Fanny Fern. Twayne's United States Authors Series. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1993. Print.
Warren, Joyce W. “Fanny Fern‘s Rose Clark.” Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers 8.2 (1992): 92-103. Print.
Warren, Joyce W. Introduction. Ruth Hall and Other Writings. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1986. ix-xxxix. Print.
Warren, Joyce W. “Legacy Profile: Fanny Fern (1811-1872).” Legacy: A Journal of Nineteenth Century American Women Writers 2.2 (1985): 54-60. Print.
Warren, Joyce W. “Sara Payson Willis Parton (Fanny Fern).” American Women Prose Writers, 1820-1870. Ed. Amy E. Hudock and Katharine Rodier. Dictionary of Literary Biography. Vol. 239. Detroit: Gale, 2001. 231-41. Print.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
