The Changing Face of Economics? Ethical Issues in Contemporary Economic Schools as a Consequence of Changes in the Concept of Human Nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.18.4.04Słowa kluczowe:
business ethics, heterodox economic schools, economic anthropology, concept of human natureAbstrakt
The last financial crisis combined with some recent social trends (like growing inequality or environmental problems) inspired many contemporary economists to the re-evaluation of actual economic knowledge in the search for solutions to these problems. Modern economic schools (especially heterodox ones) stress the meaning of ethical issues in economics more often. The thesis of the paper is that this revival of the ethical face of present economics depends very strongly on the changing assumptions of human nature within economics and other disciplines which work alongside economics, such as social psychology or business ethics, for instance. In order to prove the thesis, the paper provides an evaluation of current economic schools, especially within the heterodoxy, in search of their ethical aspects, and presents them as a result of the changing assumptions about human beings within those schools. This ethical dimension of human beings manifests itself in different ways, which can be perceived as a result of it being based on different ethical schools and different psychological and philosophical assumptions about human nature. Therefore, the paper also considers the current developments of the view on human beings in contemporary schools of economic ethics.Bibliografia
Apel K.-O., Das Apriori der kommunikationsgemeinschaft, Suhrkamp, 1976.
Apel K.-O., Globalization and the need for universal ethics, “European Journal of Social Theory” 2000, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 137–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310022224732
Apel K.-O., Grenzen der Diskursethik? Versuch einer Zwischenbilanz, “Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung” 1986, pp. 3–31.
Apel K.-O., The situation of humanity as an ethical problem, “Praxis International” 1984, No. 3, pp. 250–265.
Beaudreau B.C., A humanistic theory of economic behavior, “The Journal of Socio-Economics” 2012, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 222–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.002
Becker C., The human actor in ecological economics: Philosophical approach and research perspectives, “Ecological economics” 2006, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 17–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.016
Becker G.S., The economic approach to human behavior [in:] The Economics Approach to Human Behavior, ed. G.S. Becker, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1976, pp. 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226217062.001.0001
Bentham J., J.S. Mill, The utilitarians, Anchor Press, Garden City, NY 1973.
Boulding K., Evolutionary Economics, Sage, London 1981.
Boulding K.E., What is evolutionary economics?, “Journal of Evolutionary Economics” 1991, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 9–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202334
Bowie N.E., A Kantian Theory of Meaningful Work, “Journal of Business Ethics” 1998, Vol. 17, pp. 1083–1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006023500585
Camerer C.F., G. Loewenstein, Behavioral economics: Past, present, future [in:] Advances in behavioral economics, ed. C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2004, pp. 3–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118-004
Charuseela S., Social Analysis and the Capabilities Approach: A Limit to Martha Nussbaum’s Universalist Ethics, “Cambridge Journal of Economics” 2009, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1135–1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben027
Collins D., Essentials of business ethics: Creating an organization of high integrity and superior performance, John Wiley & Sons, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118386163
Daly H.E., J. Farley, Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, Island Press, Washington, DC 2010.
Dopfer K., J. Potts, On the Theory of Economic Evolution, “Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review” 2009, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 23–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.6.23
Dzionek-Kozłowska J., Ekonomia jako nauka pozytywna. Refleksje na marginesie „Ekonomii dobra i zła” Tomáša Sedláčka, “Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym”, Vol. 16, pp. 335–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.16.24
Dzionek-Kozlowska J., R. Matera, Ethics in Economic Thought. Selected Issues and Various Perspectives, Lodz University Press, Jagiellonian University Press, Lodz-Cracow 2015, pp. 81–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-687-1
Eisenhardt K., Agency theory: An assessment and review, “Academy of Management Review” 1989, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
Etzioni A., The Essential Communitarian Reader, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 1998.
Etzioni A., Toward a Kantian Socio-Economics, “Review of Social Economy” 1987, Vol. 45, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346768700000003
Etzioni A.X., Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics, Simon and Schuster, 2010.
Faber M., R. Manstetten, J. Proops, Ecological Economics. Concepts and Methods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 1996.
Ferber M.A., J.A. Nelson, Beyond economic man: feminist theory and economics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226242088.001.0001
Habermas J., Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 2001.
Habermas J., Philosophische Anthropologie, [in:] Kultur und Kritik, ed. J. Habermas, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1973.
Habermas J., The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Beacon Press, 1987.
Hamilton D.B., Evolutionary economics: A study of change in economic thought, Transaction Publ., New Brunswick, NJ 1991.
Herman A., Dokąd zmierza ekonomia?, “Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie” 2008, No. 2, pp. 4–13.
Hewitson G., Feminist economics as a Postmodern Moment, “Review of Social Economy” 2007, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 187–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760701345508
Hodgson G.M., From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities, An Evolutionary Economics without Homo economicus, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922737.001.0001
Höffe O., Humanität [in:] Lexikon der Ethik, ed. O. Höffe, München 1980, pp. 112–113.
Homann K., F. Blome-Drees, Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1992.
Horodecka A., E. Mazur-Wierzbicka, The meaning of the concept of human nature in the organization and ethical concepts supporting CSR, [in:] CSR – Społeczny wymiar działalności biznesowej, ed. E. Mazur-Wierzbicka, Economicus, Szczecin 2014.
Horodecka A., Homo oeconomicus, jako podstawa ekonomii – krytyka i alternatywy [Homo economicus, as the basis of economics – criticism and alternatives], “Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu” 2014, No. 347, pp. 166–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2014.347.16
Horodecka A., Komponenty obrazu człowieka w ekonomii [Components of the concept of human nature in economics]. “Kwartalnik Historii Myśli Ekonomicznej [Quarterly History of Economic Thought]” 2014, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 117–139.
Horodecka A., Rola obrazów człowieka w koncepcjach zarządzania z uwzględnieniem aspektów metodologicznych [The role of human images in the concepts of management, taking into account methodological aspects], [in:] Studia Ekonomiczne Nauki o zarządzaniu – u początków i współcześnie, ed. A. Czech, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, Katowice 2012, pp. 443–464.
Horodecka A., Światowe religie wobec współczesnych wyzwań rozwojowych [The response of world religions to today's development challenges], [in:] J. Stacewicz, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, Warsaw 2015.
Horodecka A., The goal and field of evolutionary and neoclassical economics as a consequence of the changes in concepts of human nature, 15th EBES Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, January 8–10, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/11
Horodecka A., The Meaning of Concepts of Human Nature in Organizational Life in Business Ethical Context, “Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym / Annales. Ethics in Economic Life” 2014, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 53–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.17.4.04
Kahneman D., A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, “Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society” 1979, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kahneman D., Thinking, fast and slow, Macmillan, 2011.
Karmasin M., M. Litschka, Wirtschaftsethik: Theorien, Strategien, Trends, Lit-Verl., Wien 2008.
Klimczak B., Model człowieka gospodarującego we współczesnej ekonomii [in:] Wizerunek współczesnego człowieka gospodarującego, ed. A. Węgrzycki, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie, Cracow 2000, pp. 11–29.
Kołodko G.W., Dokąd zmierza świat. Ekonomia polityczna przyszłości, Prószyński i S-ka, Warsaw 2013.
Kołodko G.W., Wędrujący świat, Prószyński i S-ka, Warsaw 2008.
Lin N., Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.
Lutz M.A., K. Lux, Humanistic economics: the new challenge, Bootstrap Press, New York, NY 1988.
Lutz M.A.X., Economics for the Common Good: Two Centuries of Economic Thought in the Humanist Tradition, Routledge, 2002.
Nelson J., Feminist Economics at the Millennium: A Personal Perspective, “Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society” 2000, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 1177–1181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/495541
Nelson J.A., Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics, “Ecological economics” 2008, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 441–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.001
Nussbaum M.C., Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and Social Justice, “Feminist Economics" 2003, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 33–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926
Pelenc J., M.K. Lompo, J. Ballet, J.-L. Dubois, Sustainable human development and the capability approach: Integrating environment, responsibility and collective agency, “Journal of Human Development and Capabilities” 2013, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 77–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747491
Pieper A., Einfü hrung in die Ethik [in:] Mut zum Aufbruch. Eine wirtschaftspolitische Agenda fü r die Schweiz, ed. D. Hauser, H.B. Schmid, Zu ̈ rich 1995.
Rich A., Wirtschaftsethik: Grundlagen in theologischer Perspektive, Gütersloher Verlagshaus, Gütersloh 1984.
Sedláček T., Ekonomia dobra i zła, Wydawnictwo EMKA, Warsaw 2012.
Sen A.K., Commodities and Capabilities, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1985.
Sen A.K., Development as freedom, Univ. Press, Oxford 2001.
Sen A.K., Inequality Reexamined, Russell Sage, New York 1992.
Stacewicz J., Etyczne przesłanki działania gospodarczego, “Problemy” 1988, No. 4, pp. 1–5.
Ulrich P., Integrative Economic Ethics: Foundations of a Civilized Market Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488658
Ulrich P., Integrative Wirtschaftsethik: Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie, Haupt, Bern 2001.
Ulrich P., Integrative Wirtschaftsethik: Grundlagenreflexion der ökonomischen Vernunft, "Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften” 2000, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 555–567.
Ulrich P., Integrative Wirtschaftsethik—eine Heuristik auch für die Technikethik? [in:] Technikethik und Wirtschaftsethik, Springer, 1998, pp. 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97402-0_3
Wieland J., Corporate governance, values management, and standards: an European perspective, “Business & Society” 2005, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 74–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305274852
Wieland J., Die Ethik der Governance, Metropolis-Verl., Marburg 2004.
Wieland J., Eine Theorie der Governanceethik, “Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik” 2001, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 8–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/1439-880X-2001-1-8
Wieland J., Governance ethics: Global value creation, economic organization and normatively, Springer, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07923-3
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Jak cytować
