Mediation as a Factor Strengthening the Communicative Aspect of Law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.100.05

Keywords:

ontology of law, the essence of law, communication, law as communication, dialogue, mediation, legal dispute, decision

Abstract

When reviewing contemporary concepts of law, it is easy to notice that many of them emphasise the role of communication and dialogue in law. This paper is an attempt to link the philosophical aspect with legal practice, picturing both the basic ontological concepts based on the communicative aspect and the mediation as a form of dialogue in law application process. The aim is to draw attention to the correspondence between the mediation and deliberative democracy in the multi-centric legal reality. The conclusion indicates that the professionalisation of the profession of mediator shall help in such a process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexy, Robert. 1978. Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie das rationalen Diskurses als Theorie derristischen Begründung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Press.

Haarscher, Guy. 2005. “Some Contemporary Trends in Continental Philosophy of Law.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Edited by Martin P. Golding, William A. Edmundson. 300–312. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631228325.2004.00023.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631228325.2004.00023.x

Habermas, Jürgen. 1967. Theorie und Praxis. Neuwied Am Rhein–Berlin: Luchterhand.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

Helleringer, Genevive. Kai Purnhagen. 2014. Towards European Legal Culture. Baden Baden–München–Oxford: Beck Hart Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263632

Hoecke, Mark van. 2002. Law as Communication. Oxford–Portland (OR): Bloomsbury.

Kaufmann, Arthur. 1985. Problemgeschichte der Rechtsphilosophie. Heidelberg: Winters.

Kaufmann, Arthur. 1986. “Über die Wissenschaftlichkeit der Rechtswissenschaft.” Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialpilosophie 72(4): 425–442.

Leśniewski, Norbert. 2000. „Mapa filozofii hermeneutycznej”. In O filozofii dzisiaj. Edited by Roman Kozłowski. 133–144. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1983. Rechtssoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95699-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95699-6

Luhmann, Niklas. 1987. “The Unity of Legal System.” In Autopoietic Law Autopoietic Law. A New Approach to Law and Society. Edited by Gunther Teubner. 12–35. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110876451.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110876451.12

Oniszczuk, Jerzy. 2004. Koncepcje prawa. Warszawa: WSPiZ Koźmińskiego.

Perelman, Chaim. 1979. The New Rhetorics and the Humanities. Esseys on Rhetorics and its Applications. London–Boston: Springer.

Wronkowska, Sławomira. Zygmunt Ziembiński. 1997. Zarys teorii prawa. Poznań: Ars boni et aequi.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-29

How to Cite

Mediation as a Factor Strengthening the Communicative Aspect of Law. (2023). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 100, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.100.05