The Vandal habrosýne and its Significance in Procopius’ Narrative on the Rise and Fall of the Vandal State

Michał Stachura

doi:10.18778/2084-140X.14.14

Authors

Michał Stachura Jagiellonian University, Institute of History https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-5951

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.14.14

Keywords:

Procopius of Caesarea, Herodotus of Halicarnassus, Vandals, Gelimer, habrosýne, Týche

Abstract

The description of the Vandals’ habrosýne (Procopius, De bellis, IV, 6, 5–9) apparently fit in with the topos of “a nation once valiant who, living among the luxuries, succumbed to effeminacy”, which had been present in Greco-Roman literature since the time of Herodotus. Following such a course of interpretation, this description could explain why the once formidable conquerors were so easily defeated by a comparatively smaller force under Belisarius’ command. However, a closer look at the actual function of this passage in Procopius’ narrative on the rise and fall of the Vandal state brings this seemingly obvious interpretation into question. It gains a particular significance when we discover some surprising parallels between the fates of the last Vandal king, Gelimer, and the last Lydian king, Croesus – as these two are depicted by Procopius and Herodotus, respectively. If we should recognize that what we have here is a particular literary allusion, a re-application of a Herodotean pattern for the purpose of recounting a contemporary story, this passage takes on a new meaning: representing the former affluence and the present misery of the Vandals serves as a starting point to deliberations on human helplessness in the face of Fate, while referring to habrosýne, as a stereotypical characteristic attributed to the Lydians, is an additional clue to put us on a track leading to associations between the two narratives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii, vol. I, Commentarii belli gallici, ed. A. Klotz, Leipzig 1920.

Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. II, Codex Iustinianus, rec. P. Krüger, Berlin 1954.

Flavii Cresconii Corippi Iohannidos seu De Bellis Libycis Libri VIII, ed. J. Diggle, D. Goodyear, F. Richard, Cambridge 1970.

Hérodote, Histoire, ed. Ph.-E. Legrand, Paris 1932–1956.

Isocrates, Panegyrikos, [in:] Isocratis Orationes, vol. I, ed. F. Blass, Leipzig 1907, p. 41–87.

Malchus of Philadelphia, Fragments, [in:] The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of Late Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodoros, Priscus and Malchus, vol. II, ed. R.C. Blockley, Liverpool 1983, p. 402–462.

Mauritii Strategicon, ed. G. Dennis, trans. E. Gamillscheg, Wien 1981 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae, 17].

Procopii Caesarensis Opera Omnia, vol. I–II, De bellis libri VIII, ed. J. Haury, G. Wirth, Leipzig 1962–1963.

Procopii Caesarensis Opera Omnia, vol. III, Historia quae dicitur Arcana, ed. J. Haury, G. Wirth, Leipzig 1964.

Salvien de Marseille, Oeuvres II. Du gouverment de Dieu, ed. G. Lagarrigue, Paris 1975 [= Sources Chrétiennes, 220].

Theodosiani Libri XVI cum Constitutionibus Sirmondianis et Leges Novellae ad Theodosianum pertinentes, ed. Th. Mommsen, P.M. Meyer, Berlin 1905.

Titi Livii Ab urbe condita libri XXIII–XXV, ed. Th.A. Dorey, Leipzig 1976.

Xenophon, Helléniques, ed., trans. J. Hatzfeld, Paris 2019.

Xenophon, Institutio Cyri, ed. W. Gemoll, Leipzig 1968 [= Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana], https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110948912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110948912

Herodotus, Books I–II, ed. J. Henderson, trans. A.D. Godley, Cambridge, Mass.–London 1999 [= Loeb Classical Library, 117].

Procopios, The Wars of Justinian, trans. H.B. Dewing, revised and modernized, with Introduction and notes by A. Kaldellis, Indianapolis–Cambridge, Mass. 2014.

Prokop, Werke, vol. IV, Vandalenkriege, ed. O. Veh, München 1971.

Prokopiusz z Cezarei, Historia wojen, vol. I, ed., trans. D. Brodka, Kraków 2013.

Ager S.L., Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the Ptolemaic Dynasty, “Journal of Hellenic Studies” 125, 2005, p. 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075426900007084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075426900007084

Andres H., Der καιρός bei Prokop von Kaisareia, “Millennium” 14, 2017, p. 73–102, https://doi.org/10.1515/mill-2017-0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mill-2017-0003

Basso F., Greatrex G., How to Interpret Procopius’ Preface to the Wars, [in:] Procopius of Caesarea. Literary and Historical Interpretations, ed. C. Lilington-Martin, E. Turquois, London–New York 2018, p. 59–72, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-5

Börm H., Justinians Triumph und Belisars Erniedrigung, Überlegungen zum Verhältnis zwischen Kaiser und Militär im späten Römischen Reich, “Chiron” 43, 2013, p. 63–91.

Börm H., Procopius, his Predecessors, and the Genesis of the Anecdota: Antimonarchic Discourse in Late Antique Historiography, [in:] Antimonarchic Discourse in Antiquity, ed. H. Börm, Stuttgart 2015, p. 305–346, https://doi.org/10.25162/9783515110969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25162/9783515110969

Braun H., Die Nachahmung Herodots durch Prokop, Nürnberg 1894.

Briant P., History and Ideology: The Greeks and the ‘Persian Decadence’, [in:] Greeks and Barbarians, ed. Th. Harrison, New York 2002, p. 193–210, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474468916-016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474468916-016

Brodka D., Die Geschichtsphilosophie in der spätantiken Historiographie. Studien zu Prokopios von Kaisareia, Agathias von Myrina und Theophylaktos Simokattes, Frankfurt am Main 2004 [= Studien und Texte zur Byzantinistik, 5].

Brodka D., Prokop von Caesarea, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York 2022.

Cameron A., Gelimer’s Laughter: The Case of Byzantine Africa, [in:] Tradition and Innovation in Late Antiquity, ed. F.M. Clover, R.S. Humphreys, Madison 1989, p. 171–190.

Cameron A., The ‘Scepticism’ of Procopius, “Historia” 15, 1966, p. 466–482.

Conant J., Staying Roman. Conquest and Identity in Africa and the Mediterranean, 439–700, Cambridge 2012 [= Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, 82], https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048101

Cozzoli U., La τρυφή nella interpretazione delle crisi politiche, [in:] Tra Grecia e Roma. Temi antichi e metodologie moderne, Roma 1980, p. 133–145.

Dorati M., La Lidia e la τρυφή, “Aevum Antiquum” N.S. 3, 2003, p. 503–530.

Eidinow E., TYCHĒ (τύχη, ἡ), [in:] The Herodotus Encyclopaedia, ed. Ch. Baron, Hoboken 2021, p. 1507–1509.

Fisher N., Hybris. A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greece, Warminster 1992.

Fleischer R., Hellenistic Royal Iconography on Coins, [in:] Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship. Studies in Hellenistic civilisation, vol. VII, ed. P. Bilde, T. Engberg-Petersen, L. Hannestad, J. Zahle, Aarhus 1996, p. 28–40.

Grabowski T., Tryphé w ideologii Ptolemeuszy, [in:] Społeczeństwo i religia w świecie antycznym. Materiały z ogólnopolskiej konferencji naukowej (Toruń 20–22 września 2007), ed. Sz. Olszaniec, P. Wojciechowski, Toruń 2010, p. 91–107.

Gruen E.S., Rethinking the Other in Antiquity, Princeton–Oxford 2011, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836550

Harrison Th., Divinity and History – The Religion of Herodotus, Oxford 2000 [= Oxford Classical Monographs].

Heinen H., Die Tryphè von Ptolemaios VIII Euergetes II. Beobachtungen zum ptolomäischen Herrscherideal und zu einer römischen Gesandtschaft in Ägypten (140/139 v. Chr.), [in:] Althistorische Studien Hermann Bengtson zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht von Kollegen und Schülern, ed. H. Heinen, K. Stroheker, G. Walser, Wiesbaden 1983, p. 116–128.

Isaac B., The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity, Princeton–Oxford 2004, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400849567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400849567

Kaegi W.E., Arianism and the Byzantine Army in Africa 533–546, “Traditio” 21, 1965, p. 23–53, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900017657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900017657

Kaldellis A., Ethnography after Antiquity. Foreign Lands and Peoples in Byzantine Literature, Philadelphia 2013, https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208405

Kaldellis A., Procopius of Caesarea. Tyranny, History, and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity, Philadelphia 2004, https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202410

Kaldellis A., Procopius’s Vandal War. Thematic Trajectories and Hidden Transcripts, [in:] North Africa under Byzantium and Early Islam, ed. S.T. Stevens, J. Conant, Cambridge, Mass. 2016 [= Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine Symposia and Colloquia], p. 13–21.

Knaepen A., L’image du roi vandale Gélimer chez Procope de Césarée, “Byzantion” 71, 2001, p. 383–403.

Kruse M., Archery in the Preface to Procopius’ Wars. A Figured Image of Agonistic Authorship, “Studies in Late Antiquity” 1, 2017, p. 381–406, https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2017.1.4.381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2017.1.4.381

Kurke L., The Politics of ἁβροσύνη in Archaic Greece, “Classical Antiquity” 11, 1992, p. 91–120, https://doi.org/10.2307/25010964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25010964

Lambert D., The Barbarians in Salvian’s De gubernatione Dei, [in:] Ethnicity and Culture in Late Antiquity, ed. S. Mitchell, G. Greatrex, London 2000, p. 103–115, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1n357t2.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1n357t2.13

Lausberg H., Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study, trans. M.T. Bliss, A. Jansen, D.E. Orton, Leiden–Boston–Köln 1998, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004663213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004663213

Meaker M., Von Blumenkranzen, Salbölen und Purpurgewänder. Luxus und Geschlechtsrollen in archaischen Griechenland, [in:] Luxus, Perspektiven von der Antike bis Neuzeit, ed. E. Luppi, J. Voges, Stuttgart 2022, p. 51–79.

Miles R., Vandal North Africa and the Fourth Punic War, “Classical Philology” 112.3, 2017, p. 384–410, https://doi.org/10.1086/692906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/692906

Passerini A., La ΤΡΥΦΗ nella storiografia ellenistica, “Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica” 11, 1934, p. 35–56.

Pazdernik Ch., Xenophon’s Hellenica in Procopius’ Wars: Pharnabazus and Belisarius, “Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies” 46, 2006, p. 175–206.

Ranston H., Ecclesiastes and the Early Greek Wisdom Literature, London 1925.

Schmidt-Hofner S., Das Klassische Griechenland. Der Krieg und die Freiheit, München 2016, https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406679162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406679162

Sidebottom H., Ancient Warfare. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford–New York 2004, https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804709.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804709.001.0001

Signes Codoñer J., Kaiserkritik in Prokops Kriegsgeschichte, [in:] Freedom and its Limits in the Ancient World. Proceedings of the Colloquium Held at the Jagellonian University, Kraków, September 2003, ed. D. Brodka, J. Janik, S. Sprawski, Kraków 2003 [= Electrum. Studia z Historii Starożytnej, 9], p. 215–229.

Stachura M., Inspirations from Herodotus Found in Procopius’ Account on the Fall of the Vandal Kingdom, [in:] Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium of Byzantine and Medieval Studies “Days of Justinian I”, Skopje 9–11 November 2023 (forthcoming).

Stachura M., The Distant Origins of “Fat Shaming” or why the People of Antiquity did not Ridicule Fat Women, “Studia Ceranea” 12, 2022, p. 181–213, https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.12.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.12.36

Stachura M., Der persische Krieger bei Prokop. Ein Beitrag zur Militärethnographie der Spätantike, [in:] Byzantina et Slavica. Studies in Honour of Professor Maciej Salamon, ed. S. Turlej, M. Stachura, B.J. Kołoczek, A. Izdebski, Kraków 2019, p. 367–381.

Steinacher R., Gruppen und Identitäten. Gedanken zur Bezeichnung „vandalisch”, [in:] Das Reich der Vandalen und seine (Vor-)geschichten, ed. G.M. Berndt, R. Steinacher, Wien 2008, p. 243–260.

Stewart M.E., Between Two Worlds: Men’s Heroic Conduct in the Writings of Procopius, Diss. San Diego 2003.

Stewart M.E., The Danger of the Soft Life. Manly and Unmanly Romans in Procopius’s Gothic War, “Journal of Late Antiquity” 10, 2017, p. 473–502, https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2017.0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2017.0025

Stewart M.E., Masculinity, Identity, and Power Politics in the Age of Justinian. A Study of Procopius, Amsterdam 2020, https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048540259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462988231

Stewart M.E., The Soldier’s Life. Martial Virtues and Manly Romanitas in the Early Byzantine Empire, Leeds 2016, p. 247–316.

Tondriau J., La tryphè: philosophie royale ptolémaïque, “Revue des études anciennes” 50, 1948, p. 49–54, https://doi.org/10.3406/rea.1948.3388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rea.1948.3388

Van Nuffelen P., The Wor(l)ds of Procopius, [in:] Procopius of Caesarea. Literary and Historical Interpretations, ed. C. Lilington-Martin, E. Turquois, London–New York 2018, p. 40–55, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-4

Wilczyński M., Gejzeryk i „czwarta wojna punicka”, Oświęcim 2016.

Wood Ph.I., Being Roman in Procopius’ Vandal Wars, “Byzantion” 81, 2011, p. 424–447.

Zali V., Fate, Divine phthonos, and the Wheel of Fortune: the Reception of Herodotean Theology in Early and Middle Byzantine Historiography, [in:] God in History. Reading and Rewriting Herodotean Theology from Plutarch to the Renaissance, ed. A. Ellis, Newcastle upon Tyne 2015, p. 85–126, https://doi.org/10.29173/histos88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/histos88