The Crisis Model: A Socially Useful Psychologism

Katarina Jacobsson; Malin Åkerström

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.15

Authors

Katarina Jacobsson Lund University, Sweden
Malin Åkerström Lund University, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.15

Keywords:

Crisis, Crisis Model, Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, Cochlear Implants, Psychologism, Caring Professionals, Parents

Abstract

The model of “crisis” is a culturally shared and widespread idea of human reactions to misfortunes such as accidents, diagnosis of disease, divorces, becoming a parent of a disabled child, and so on. The crisis model conveys the idea of coming to terms with unwanted experiences while advancing through various phases, for example, of denial, processing, and acceptance. The language of crises is integrated into Western emotional culture, particularly in the language used by caring professionals (e.g., social workers, psychologists, counselors, and health staff). Crisis talk is also frequent in the media, popular science books, and in everyday conversations when individual experiences are reported, debated, or discussed. Investigating the specific local culture of the Swedish world of the Deaf, to which families whose children have been diagnosed deaf belong, we aimed to extend the current understanding of crisis. How do parents and professionals make use of the crisis model when speaking about their own experiences, as well as the experiences of others? We observed that the crisis model served as a prop in such talk; it was used to compare, defend, criticize, and explain the behavior of others, but also to account for one’s own emotions and behavior. In the process, locally relevant identities and categorizations of others were constructed. The crisis model was originally a way of “diagnosing” parents’ emotional experiences when they learned about their children being deaf, but it has proven useful for other purposes in a context with abundant ideological differences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Katarina Jacobsson, Lund University, Sweden

Katarina Jacobsson is an Associate Professor at the School of Social Work, Lund University, Sweden. With a general interest in qualitative methodology and sociology of knowledge, her current project deals with documenting practices among human service workers. Previous work includes studies of bribery (“Accounts of Honesty” in Deviant Behavior) and medical staff’s use of categories (“Categories by Heart” in Professions and Professionalism). A recent text on methodology, “Interviewees With an Agenda. Learning From a ‘Failed’ Interview” (with M. Åkerström), is published in Qualitative Research.
Malin Åkerström, Lund University, Sweden

Malin Åkerström is a Professor of Sociology at Lund University in Sweden. Her research focuses on ethnographic studies of deviance. She has published several books, including Suspicious Gifts: Bribery, Morality, and Professional Ethics (2014), Betrayers and Betrayers, and Crooks and Squares, and articles such as “Doing Ambivalence: Embracing Policy Innovation—At Arm’s Length” (Social Problems), “Balancing Contradictory Identities—Performing Masculinity in Victim Narratives” (with V. Burcar and D. Wästerfors in Sociological Perspective).

References

Åkerström, Malin. 1993. Det egendomliga blir förståeligt – En sociologisk studie av uppbyggnaden av en hjärnskadeavdelning [Understanding the Strange and Peculiar—A Sociological Study of Constructing a Brain Trauma Clinic]. Research report. Medical Sociology, Sociologiska institutionen, Lunds universitet.

Åkerström, Malin. 2004. Föräldraskap och expertis: Motsättningar kring handikappade barn [Parents and Experts: Conflicts and Disagreements About Disabled Children]. Malmo: Liber.

Åkerström, Malin and Katarina Jacobsson. 2009. “Expressing and Examining Morality in Everyday Life: Social Comparisons Among Swedish Parents of Deaf Children.” Qualitative Sociology Review 5(2):54-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.5.2.03

Berbrier, Mitch. 1998. “‘Being Deaf Has Little to Do With One’s Ears’: Boundary Work in the Deaf Culture Movement.” Pp. 79-100 in Perspectives on Social Problems, edited by J. Holstein and G. Miller. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

Berbrier, Mitch. 2002. “Making Minorities: Cultural Space, Stigma Transformation Frames, and the Categorical Status Claims of Deaf, Gay, and White Supremacist Activists in Late Twentieth Century America.” Sociological Forum 17(4):553-591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021025307028

Berger, Peter and Hansfried Kellner. 1982. Sociology Reinterpreted. London: Penguin.

Best, Joel. 1990. Threatened Children—Rhetoric and Concern About Child-Victims. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Best, Joel. 2008. “Historical Development and Defining Issues of Constructionist Inquiry.” Pp. 41-64 in Handbook of Constructionist Research, edited by J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Clark, Candence. 1997. Misery and Company: Sympathy in Everyday Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226107585.001.0001

Cullberg, Johan. 1975. Kris och utveckling [Crises and Development]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.

Czarniawska, Barbara and Guje Sevon. 2005. Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects, and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

Erikson, Erik H. 1980. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Faircloth, Christopher A. et al. 2004. “Sudden Illness and Biographical Flow in Narratives of Stroke Recovery.” Sociology of Health & Illness 26(2):242-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00388.x

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gradin Franzén, Anna and Karin Aronsson. 2013. “Teasing, Laughing, and Disciplinary Humor: Staff-Youth Interaction in Detention Home Treatment.” Discourse Studies 15(29):167-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471469

Gregory, Susan. 1991. “Challenging Motherhood: Mothers and Their Deaf Children.” Pp. 123-142 in Motherhood, Meanings, Practices, and Ideologies, edited by A. Phoenix, A. Woollett, and E. Lloyd. London: Sage.

Gyllenram, Ann-Charlotte and Radi Jönsson. 2014. Grattis! Du har blivit förälder! Barn med hörselnedsättning – en handbok i modern familjeintervention [Congratulations! You’ve Become a Parent! Children With Impaired Hearing—A Handbook in Modern Family Intervention]. Goteborg: Interquest AB.

Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium. 1995. The Active Interview. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986120

Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium. 2000. Constructing the Life Course. New York: General Hall.

Hooyman, Nancy and Betty Kramer. 2006. Living Through Loss: Interventions Across the Life Span. New York: Columbia University Press.

Jacobsson, Katarina. 1999. “Conveying the ‘Right’ Knowledge: Rhetorical Work With Families of the Deaf.” Pp. 239-260 in Perspectives on Social Problems, edited by J. Holstein and G. Miller. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

Jacobsson, Katarina. 2000. Retoriska strider. Konkurrerande sanningar i dövvärlden [A Battle of Words. Competing Truths in the World of the Deaf]. Lund: Palmkrons Förlag.

Jarkman, Kristina. 1996. Ett liv att leva [A Life to Live]. Stockholm: Carlssons.

Kusenbach, Margarethe and Donileen Loseke. 2013. “Bringing the Social Back In: Some Suggestions for the Qualitative Studies of Emotions.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(2):20-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.2.03

Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth. 1969/2009. On Death and Dying. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203889657

Lemke, Jay. 1995. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Tavistock.

Loseke, Donileen. 1999. Thinking About Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

National Agency for Special Needs Education and Schools. 2011. Utvärdering av teckenspråksutbildningar för föräldrar, syskon och barn till döva inom Specialpedagogiska skolmyndigheten [Evaluation of Sign Language Education for Parents, Children, and Siblings to Deaf Children]. Retrieved January 12, 2014 http://www.spsm.se/PageFiles/6105/Rapport%20utvärdering%20teckenspråksutbildning%20SPSM%20-%20110216.pdf

Reddy, William M. 2001. The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511512001

Richt, Bengt. 1992. Mellan två världar: om konflikten mellan livets krav och doktorns önskningar. Lärdomar från familjer med ett diabetssjukt barn [Between Two Social Worlds: On the Conflict Between the Demands of Life and the Doctor’s Wishes: Lessons From Families With Diabetic Children]. Ph.D. thesis, Linköping University.

Ryding, Anna. 1999. “Föräldrakunskap- olika tolkningar. Institutioners varierade vetande och former för familjestöd till föräldrar med döva barn [Parental Knowledge—Various Interpretations. The Knowledge of Institutions and Varied Forms for Family Support to Families With Deaf Children].” Research program in Medical Sociology, Department of Sociology, Lund University.

Säwe, Filippa. 2004. Att tala med, mot och förbi varandra. Samtal mellan föräldrar och skolledning på en dövskola [Speaking With, Against, or Past Each Other—Meetings With Parents and School Representatives at a School for Deaf Children]. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology, Lund University.

Scheler, Max. 1992. On Feeling, Knowing, and Valuing, edited by H. Bershady. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Silverman, David and Jaber F. Gubrium. 1994. “Competing Strategies for Analyzing the Contexts of Social Interaction.” Sociological Inquiry 64(2):179-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1994.tb00387.x

Watters, Ethan. 2010. Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche. New York: Free Press.

Wästerfors, David. 1999. “Andra säger bara ’o vad hemskt det är’ Samtal mellan mammor till hjärnskadade barn [Other People Just Say “Oh! It’s Horrible!” Conversations Between Mothers of Children With Brain Injuries].” Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 2:142-158.