Functional and Pragmatic Features of Slogans and Appeals of the Soviet Era: Semantic, Semiotic and Psycholinguistic Aspects

Authors

  • Yaroslav Mel’nik Прикарпатский национальный университет, имени Василия Стефаника, Факультет филологии, 76018 Украина, Ивано-Франковск, ул. Шевченко, 57 image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5511-1881

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-8025.20.06

Keywords:

semantics, structure, typology, communication, appeal

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problems of organizing the information space using propaganda slogans and appeals that were typical of the Soviet era between the 1970s and 1990s. All totalitarian systems exploit ideologemes in an exaggerated version, as well as various types of appeals. These information messages are one of the key tools of totalitarian myth-making. And, as historical experience has shown, their operation is very effective. Since the twenty-first century is not free from totalitarian regimes, as well as trends, in those countries that have discarded old regimes and have embarked on the path of democratic development, totalitarian propaganda methods are seen as a ballast, yet they are present and affect the information landscape. They also promote destructive tendencies in the humanitarian sphere in general and interfere with the process of objective coverage of the past and present. This area requires in-depth and systematic research, which is currently in in­fancy.The article explores one of the facets of the problem.In the process of describing the complex of propaganda appeals, the author relies on the methods of analysis, synthesis, end-to-end sampling, and differentiation based on pragmatic features. As a result, more than 150 slogans and appeals of the communist era were selected, which are among the universal and most used and distributed in terms of the headings, and their main suggestive functions were analysed. At this stage of the study, key theses were formulated that highlight the artificiality and inconsistency of the programme statements of the era of stagnation, as well as their destructive function in relation to the socio-mental and communicative axiological picture of the world.

References

Аджемоглу, Д., Робінсон, Д. (2018). Чому нації занепадають. Походження влади, багатства та бідності. Київ: Наш формат.
Google Scholar

Вежбиньски, Я. (2014). Семантика и стилистика политических лозунгов, воззваний и цитат советского периода. В: A. Piasecka i I. Blumental (red.), W kręgu zagadnień semantyki i stylistyki tekstu (169–177). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-416-7.18
Google Scholar

Вежбицкая, А. (1999). Семантические универсалии и описание языков. Москва: Языки.
Google Scholar

Воробьев, В.В. (2008). Лингвокультурология. Москва: Российский университет дружбы народов.
Google Scholar

Мельник, Я.Г. (2012). Пролегомени до українського дискурсу. Івано-Франківськ: Вид-во Прикарпатського університету.
Google Scholar

Мельник, Я.Г. (2021). Риторика молчания, Лингвориторическая парадигма: теоретические и прикладные аспекты, 26 (1). Сочи: Сочинский государственный університет.
Google Scholar

Москалець, В.П. (2020). Психологія особистості. Київ: Ліра-К.
Google Scholar

Почепцов, Т.Г. (2001). Теория коммуникации. Киев: Рефл-бук Ваклер.
Google Scholar

Серебренников, Б.А. (ред.). (1988). Роль человеческого фактора в языке. Язык и картина мира. Москва: Наука.
Google Scholar

Слухай, Н.В. (2019). Сугестивна лінгвістика: лінгвістичне програмування поведінки людини. Київ: Видавничий дім Дмитра Бураго.
Google Scholar

Степанов, Ю.С. (1995). Изменчивый «образ языка» в науке ХХ века. В: Язык и наука конца 20 века. Москва: Российский государственный гуманитарный университет.
Google Scholar

Adzhemoglu, D., Robіnson D. (2018). Chomu natsії zanepadayut’. Pokhodzhennya vladi, bagatstva ta bіdnostі. Kiїv: Nash format.
Google Scholar

Mel’nik, Ya.G. (2012). Prolegomeni do ukraїns’kogo diskursu. Іvano-Frankіvs’k: Vid-vo Prikarpats’kogo unіversitetu.
Google Scholar

Mel’nik, Ya.G. (2021). Ritorika molchaniya, Lingvoritoricheskaya paradigma: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty, 26 (1). Sochi: Sochinskii gosudarstvennyi unіversitet.
Google Scholar

Moskalets’, V.P. (2020). Psikhologіya osobistostі. Kiїv: Lіra-K.
Google Scholar

Pocheptsov, T.G. (2001). Teoriya kommunikatsii. Kiev: Refl-buk Vakler.
Google Scholar

Serebrennikov, B.A. (red.). (1988). Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke. Yazyk i kartina mira. Moscow: Nauka.
Google Scholar

Slukhai, N.V. (2019). Sugestivna lіngvіstika: lіngvіstichne programuvannya povedіnki lyudini. Kiїv: Vidavnichii dіm Dmitra Burago.
Google Scholar

Stepanov, Yu.S. (1995). Izmenchivyi «obraz yazyka» v nauke KhKh veka. V: Yazyk i nauka kontsa 20 veka. Moscow: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet.
Google Scholar

Vezhbin’ski, Ya. (2014). Semantika i stilistika politicheskikh lozungov, vozzvanii i tsitat sovetskogo perioda. W: A. Piasecka i I. Blumental (red.), W kręgu zagadnień semantyki i stylistyki tekstu (169–177). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-416-7.18
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-416-7.18

Vezhbitskaya, A. (1999). Semanticheskie universalii i opisanie yazykov. Moscow: Yazyki.
Google Scholar

Vorob’ev, V.V. (2008). Lingvokul’turologiya. Moscow: Rossiiskii universitet druzhby narodov.
Google Scholar

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Mel’nik, Y. (2021). Functional and Pragmatic Features of Slogans and Appeals of the Soviet Era: Semantic, Semiotic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Rossica, (20), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-8025.20.06