Nowe spojrzenia na starą teorię. Kilka uwag o koncepcji społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2543-9421.09.05Słowa kluczowe:
społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni, teoria miejska, prawo do miasta, urbanizm cyfrowy, praktyki przestrzenneAbstrakt
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza ewolucji teorii społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni oraz refleksja nad jej aktualnością i zastosowaniem we współczesnych studiach miejskich. Prezentujemy rozwój tej koncepcji od fundamentalnych idei Henriego Lefebvre’a, poprzez ich rozwinięcia i reinterpretacje, aż po najnowsze ujęcia uwzględniające wyzwania ery cyfrowej. W naszych rozważaniach wskazujemy na potencjał teorii w analizie współczesnych zjawisk urbanistycznych, jednocześnie identyfikując wyzwania, przed którymi stoi. Konkludujemy, że pomimo wyzwań związanych z operacjonalizacją niektórych koncepcji, teoria społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni pozostaje nie tylko aktualnym, ale i cennym narzędziem analitycznym, zdolnym do uchwycenia złożoności współczesnych procesów miejskich, pod warunkiem jej ciągłej aktualizacji i krytycznej refleksji nad jej metodologią.
Bibliografia
Agrawal, S. (red.). (2022). Rights and the city: Problems, progress, and practice. University of Alberta Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781772126716
Alizadeh, T., Prasad, D. (2024). The right to the smart city in the Global South: A research agenda. Urban Studies, 61(3), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231183167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231183167
Althorpe, C., Horak, M. (2023). The end of the right to the city: A radical-cooperative view. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815
Ash, J., Kitchin, R., Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800
Astuti, W.K., Herlambang, S. (2021). Ordinary fragmentation: Network secession of urban centers in Jakarta. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 32(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/ 10.5614/JPWK.2021.32.3.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2021.32.3.4
Bannister, J., O’Sullivan, A. (2021). Big Data in the city. Urban Studies, 58(15), 3061–3070. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980 211014124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211014124
Barns, S. (2020). Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8
Blokland, T., Schultze, H. (2017). Belonging, conviviality or public familiarity? Making sense of urbanity in rapidly transforming neighbourhoods through the lens of Berlin and Rotterdam. W: M. Smagacz-Poziemska, K. Frysztacki i A. Bukowski (red.), Re-imagining the city: Municipality and urbanity today from a sociological perspective (s. 243–264). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. https://doi.org/10.4467/K9748.40/E/17.7265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/K9748.40/e/17.7265
Borch, C., Kornberger, M. (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780597
Borsekova, K., Koróny, S., Vaňová, A., Vitálišová, K. (2018). Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: A research challenge with policy implications. Cities, 78, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.010
Brenner, N. (2019). New urban spaces: Urban theory and the scale question. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190627188.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190627188.001.0001
Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., Mayer, M. (red.). (2011). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802182
Brenner, N., Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
Brighenti, A.M., Pavoni, A. (2023). On urban trajectology: Algorithmic mobilities and atmocultural navigation. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 24(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2020.1861044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2020.1861044
Bronsvoort, I., Uitermark, J.L. (2022). Seeing the street through Instagram: Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification. Urban Studies, 59(14), 2857–2874. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211046539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211046539
Caprotti, F., Chang, I.-C.C., Joss, S. (2022). Beyond the smart city: A typology of platform urbanism. Urban Transformations, 4, artykuł 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00033-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00033-9
Cardullo, P., Di Feliciantonio, C., Kitchin, R. (red.). (2019). The right to the smart city. Emerald Group Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787691391
Clark, T.N. (red.). (2004). Research in urban policy: T. 9: The city as an entertainment machine. Elsevier/JAI.
de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022
Domaradzka, A. (2018). Urban social movements and the right to the city: An introduction to the special issue on urban mobilization. Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11266-018-0030-Y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0030-y
Evans, G. (2024). Cultural spaces, production and consumption. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003216537
Fainstein, S.S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
Ferreri, M., Sanyal, R. (2018). Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London. Urban Studies, 55(15), 3353–3368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017751982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017751982
Fields, D. (2022). Automated landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 160–181. https://doi. org/10.1177/0308518X19846514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19846514
Frith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631815
Gordon, E., de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340679
Gottdiener, M. (1985). The social production of urban space. University of Texas Press.
Graham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2013). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x
Graham, M., Zook, M., Boulton, A. (2022). Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. W: S. Carta (red.), Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design (s. 341–366). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.CH27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch27
Graham, S. (2000). Constructing premium network spaces: Reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00242
Graham, S., Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202
Graham, S., Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing surveillance: Categorization, space, inequality. Critical Social Policy, 23(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006
Guttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1192–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159
Harvey, D. (2013). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso.
Hubbard, P. (2018). City (wyd. 2). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315471259
Iveson, K. (2017). Digital labourers of the city, unite! W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 20–23). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rightsto-the-city/
Jałowiecki, B. (2010). Społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni. Wydanie nowe poprawione. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Kitchin, R. (2011). The programmable city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(6), 945–951. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3806com DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b3806com
Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
Kitchin, R., Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. The MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5039/Code-SpaceSoftware-and-Everyday-Life DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
Leary-Owhin, M.E. (2016). Exploring the production of urban space: Differential space in three post-industrial cities. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447305750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447305750
Lees, L., Shin, H.B. López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Polity Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1967). Le droit à la ville. L’Homme et la société, 6, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
Lemos, A. (2008). Mobile communication and new sense of places: A critique of spatialization in cyberculture. Revista Galáxia 16, 91–108.
Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(9), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445
Löw, M. (2008). The constitution of space: The structuration of spaces through the simultaneity of effect and perception. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286
Löw, M. (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Palgrave Macmillan. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-8096072-bf5130e0f8.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-69568-3
Low, S.M. (2003). Embodied space(s): Anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and Culture, 6(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202238959
Low, S.M. (2017). Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.
Luque-Ayala, A., Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319
Massey, D.B. (2005). For space. SAGE Publications.
McFarlane, C., Silver, J. (2017). Navigating the city: Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(3), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12175
Middha, B., McShane, I. (2022). E-gentrification: Digital community engagement, urban change and digital rights to the city. W: S. Hovik, G.A. Giannoumis, K. Reichborn-Kjennerud, J.M. Ruano, I. McShane i S. Legard (red.), Citizen participation in the information society: Comparing participatory channels in urban development (s. 141–165). Palgrave Macmillan; Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7_7
Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. The Guilford Press.
Mörtenböck, P., Mooshammer, H. (2020). Platform urbanism: City-making in the age of platforms. W: P. Mörtenböck i H. Mooshammer (red.), Data publics: Public plurality in an era of data determinacy (s. 169–191). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196515-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196515-12
Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006
O’Sullivan, D., Manson, S.M. (2015). Do physicists have geography envy? And what can geographers learn from it? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P.N., Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034
Purcell, M. (2017). The city is ours (if we decide it is). W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 30–33). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/ourdigitalrights-to-the-city/
Purcell, M. (2022). Everyday code: The project for democracy on our ‘desktop’. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 1–9, artykuł 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100035
Robinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025
Romanelli, M. (2021). Driving smart cities through smart projects. W: D. Cagáňová, N. Horňáková, J. Papula, K. Stachová i L. Kohnová (red.), Management trends in the context of industry 4.0. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-12-2020.2303264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-12-2020.2303264
Rossi, U., Di Bella, A. (2017). Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(5), 999–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17690153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17690153
Salemink, K., Strijker, D., Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
Schmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N.C., Kallenberger, P., Kockelkorn, A., Sawyer, L., Streule, M., Wong, K.P. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. Urban Studies, 55(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017739750
Schwanen, T., Kwan, M.-P. (2008). The Internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum, 39(3), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.005
Shaw, J., Graham, M. (2017). An informational right to the city? Code, content, control, and the urbanization of information. Antipode, 49(4), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12312
Shaw, J., Graham, M. (red.). (2017). Our digital rights to the city. Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digitalrights-to-the-city/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.58704/xv4f-pw32
Shelton, T. (2017). Re-politicizing data. W: J. Shaw i M. Graham (red.), Our digital rights to the city (s. 24–27). Meatspace Press. https://meatspacepress.com/our-digital-rights-to-the-city/
Shields, R. (1991). Places on the margin: Alternative geographies of modernity. Routledge.
Soja, E.W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
Soja, E.W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
Soja, E.W. (2011). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory (wyd. 2). Verso.
Staeheli, L.A., Mitchell, D. (2007). The people’s property? Power, politics, and the public. Routledge.
Townsend, A.M. (2014). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W.W. Norton & Company.
Wachsmuth, D., Weisler, A. (2018). Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1147–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18778038
Yigitcanlar, T. (2015). Smart cities: An effective urban development and management model? Australian Planner, 52(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1019752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1019752
Zook, M.A., Graham, M. (2007). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 34(3), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1068/B3311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b3311
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Jak cytować
