Understanding of the Rule of Law in the Antipodes

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.26.05

Słowa kluczowe:

rule of law, state of law, law, Antipodes, Australia, New Zealand

Abstrakt

Understanding the rule of law in the Antipodes, that is in the Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand, as a legal value is clear to both of these societies. The rule of law, oftentimes called the state of law, is the basis of the system of values, as well as legal culture, which determines which social values are legally protected and how high their position de facto and de iure is. The hierarchy of the rule of law in the Antipodes shows undoubtedly how various legal norms, unwritten and those codified ones, protect the democratic system with all its principles, along with the rights and freedoms of citizens and persons residing in these two countries.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Joanna Siekiera - University of Bergen, Faculty of Law

    Dr Joanna Siekiera, an international lawyer, Doctor of Social Sciences in public policy sciences. She currently works as Postdoctoral Fellow at the Faculty of Law, University of Bergen in Norway on the legal consequences of ocean change and sovereignty of states in Oceania. Dr Siekiera did her PhD studies in New Zealand, at the Faculty of Law, Victoria University of Wellington on the topic of Pacific regionalism. Her area of expertise is the South Pacific region, Pacific Ocean governance, science diplomacy (ocean diplomacy), and the law of armed conflict (legal advising, NATO legal framework, Central Europe, security in the South Pacific, gender in armed conflict). She is the author of over 100 scientific publications in several languages, 40 legal opinions for the Polish Ministry of Justice, as well as an author of a book Regional Policy in the South Pacific (2021), and co-author of 3 monographs on international relations, including New Zealand’s Statehood, Security and Economics – History and Present (2020).

Bibliografia

Australian Aid. Web. 23 November 2021. https://australianaid.org

Australian Parliament. Web. 23 November 2021. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_23_-_Basic_legal_expressions

Baker, N. “New Zealand and Australia in Pacific Regionalism”. Eds. G. Fry. S. Tarte, The New Pacific Diplomacy. Canberra: ANU Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.22459/NPD.12.2015.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/NPD.12.2015.12

Bennett, J.A. “The American Imperial Threat to New Zealand’s Pacific Dependencies in World War Two”. Eds. I. Conrich, D. Alessio, New Zealand, France and the Pacific, Studies in New Zealand Culture 14 (2011): 45–53.

Bożyk, S. System konstytucyjny Australii. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, 2001.

Bożyk, S. System konstytucyjny Nowej Zelandii. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, 2009.

Charter of the Commonwealth signed by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Head of the Commonwealth, Commonwealth Day 2013 from 11 March 2012. Commonwealth of Nations. Web. 23 November 2021. http://thecommonwealth.org/member-countries

Conrich, I., Alessio D. Eds. New Zealand, France and the Pacific, Studies in New Zealand Culture. Nottingham, 14, 2011.

Fijałkowski, Ł. „Australia – awans do statusu mocarstwa regionalnego”. Eds. A. Jarczewska, J. Zajączkowski, Region Azji i Pacyfiku w latach 1985–2015; Ciągłość i zmiana w regionalnym systemie międzynarodowym, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, 2016.

Harford, S. “A Trans-Tasman Union Community: Growing Global Solidarity.” Labour History 95 (2008): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/27516313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/27516313

Herr, R., Bergin A. Our Near Abroad: Australia and Pacific Islands Regionalism. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 2011.

Jarczewska, A., Zajączkowski J. Eds. Region Azji i Pacyfiku w latach 1985–2015; Ciągłość i zmiana w regionalnym systemie międzynarodowym, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, 2016.

Kozielski, P. Australia i jej rola w kształtowaniu procesów integracyjnych w obszarze Azji Pacyfiku, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo CEDEWU, 2015.

Kukułka J. Historia współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych; 1945–2000 z kalendarium 2001–2006, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, 2007.

Legal translations. Web. 23 November 2021. https://legal-translations.com.au/australian-legal-system

McIntyre, W.D., Gardner W.J. Speeches and Documents on New Zealand History. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.

Murray, P. Regionalism and Community. Australia’s Options in the Asia–Pacific. Barton: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 2010.

New Zealand Government. Web. 23 November 2021. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/parliament-removes-abortion-crimes-act

New Zealand Ministry of Justice. Web. 23 November 2021. https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/learn-about-the-justice-system/how-the-justice-system-works/the-basis-for-all-law

Olssen, E.A. “The Australia - New Zealand Agreement.” The Australian Quarterly 16.3 (1944): 10–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/20631200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20631200

Pacific Community. Web. 23 November 2021. https://www.spc.int

Pacific Islands Forum. Web. 23 November 2021. https://www.forumsec.org

Quanchi, M. “End of an Epoch: towards Decolonisation and Independence in the Pacific.” Agora 43.4 (2008): 18–23.

Robinson, A. “Trends in Australian-New Zealand Relations.” The Australian Quarterly 41.1 (1969): 43–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/20634261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20634261

Rule of law. Web. 23 November 2021. https://www.ruleoflaw.org.au/guide/index.html

Siekiera, J. “Ekonomiczna analiza konstytucji Nowej Zelandii.” Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis CCCXVII/1, 2015: 115–121.

Sprengel, M., Gospodarczo-polityczne współczesne relacje Australii z Japonią: wzorzec dla stosunków międzynarodowych w regionie Azji i Pacyfiku. Kraków: Avalon, 2012.

United States Note to Japan, November 26, 1941, Dept. of State Bulletin, vol. V, no. 129, Dec. 13, 1941.

Opublikowane

2022-01-30

Jak cytować

Siekiera, Joanna. 2022. “Understanding of the Rule of Law in the Antipodes”. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 26 (2): 43-55. https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.26.05.