Wszechświat blokowy w kontekście nowego substancjalizmu czasoprzestrzennego
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.30.11Słowa kluczowe:
radical Block Universe, new spacetime substantivalism, hole argument, time, diffeomorphismsAbstrakt
The goal of the paper is to present the problem of time, which emerges in the context of the discussion about the ontological status of spacetime. The problem is a consequence of the progress of the participants of the discussion due to the application of the hole argument to the dispute. I present the shortened history of the hole argument, characterize the participants of the mentioned dispute, their development, I give a formulation of the timeless ontology and the attempts to negate it by the new spacetime substantivalists. I present and discuss a thesis suggesting that those attempts are futile.
Bibliografia
Butterfield, J., 1989, “The Hole Truth”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40, s. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/40.1.1
Earman, J., Norton, J. D., 1987, “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, s. 515–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/38.4.515
Earman, J., 1989, World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time, MIT Press Classics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; London.
Earman, J., 2003, Tracking down gauge: an ode to the constrained Hamiltonian formalism, [w:] K. Brading, E. Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics. Philosophical reflections, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535369.009
Einstein, A., 1914, “Die formale Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitaetstheorie”, Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungberichte, s. 1030–1085.
Gołosz, J., 2001, Spór o naturę czasu i przestrzeni, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
Hilbert, D., 1917, “Die Grundlagen der Physik (Zweite Mitteilung.)”, Nachr. Koenigl. Gesellsch. Wiss. Goettingen, Math.-Phys. Kl., s. 53–76.
Hoefer, C., Cartwright, N., 1993, “Substantivalism and the Hole Argument,” [w:] J. Earman et al. (eds), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Gruenbaum,: University of Pittsburgh Press/Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag Konstanz, Pittsburgh/Konstanz, s. 23–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkgg6.5
Maudlin, T., 2002, “Thoroughly Muddled McTaggart: Or, How to Abuse Gauge Freedom to Create Metaphysical Monstrosities”, Philosophers’ Imprint 2 (4), , s. 1–23.
Rickles, D., 2005, What price determinism? A Whole Other Story!, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2286/1/WPD(Rickles).pdf [dostęp: 28.10.2014]
Rovelli, C., 2004, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755804
Rynasiewicz, R., 1994, “The Lessons of the Hole Argument”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, s. 407–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.2.407
Rynasiewicz, R., 1996, “Absolute Versus Relational Space-Time: An Outmoded Debate?”, The Journal of Philosophy 93, s. 279–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2941076
Teller, P., 1998, “Quantum Mechanics and Haecceities”, [w:] E. Castellani (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton University Press, s. 114–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691222042-010
Wald, R. M., 1984, General Relativity, Univ. of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Jak cytować
