Filozoficzna i psychologiczna analiza wyborów moralnych w grze This War of Mine

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.44.04

Abstrakt

The moral choices made both in the context of everyday life and in the reality of war fascinate psychologists and philosophers focused on experimental research on intuition. In particular, in many psychological articles, the decisions made by the subjects in different variations of the trolley problem are analyzed. Most often, complex stories are presented for respondents and they can choose between two or three options to solve the problem, but it is required to indicate the option that respondent would choose if he/she found himself in the described situation. However, technological development allows the use of increasingly emotionally engaging methods of putting subjects in such dilemmas, including computer games such as This War of Mine, by 11 bit studios. In this paper selected moral choices that players in This War of Mine are facing are considered together with the decisions that were most often made in response to them, based on pilot study. The results of these analyses will be combined with data from psychological research on moral intuitions in various dilemma situations. The aim of the proposed considerations will be to answer the question whether the context of everyday life versus the reality of war affects the change of intuition regarding just action. The significance of this kind of research for philosophical inquiry into the ethics of war will also be discussed.

Bibliografia

Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., Warren C. (2014). Revisiting External Validity: Concerns about Trolley Problems and Other Sacrificial Dilemmas in Moral Psychology, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8/9, 536–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12131

Ecenbarger, C. (2016). “In war, not everyone's a soldier.” A Review of ‘This War of Mine’, Press Start, 3 (2), 70-73.

Gold, N., Colman, A. M., Pulford, B. D. (2014). Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems, Judgment and Decision Making, 9 (1), 65–76.

Iten, G. H., Steinmann, S. T., Opwis, K. (2017). Poster Session: Player Experience CHI PLAY'17 Extended Abstracts, URL = http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/3140000/3131309/p495-iten.pdf?ip=149.156.92.58&id=3131309&acc=OPENTOC&key=6AF5E6E07E3D4A13%2EDD17CAC19898612B%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E8AF5215FEFE1B25A&__acm__=1527514106_8565c88c4784c222a7bc08bf40189fc1 [dostęp 28.05.2018].

Kahane, G. (2013). The armchair and the trolley: an argument for experimental ethics, Philos Stud, 162, 421–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9775-5

Sicart, M. (2005). Game, Player, Ethics: A Virtue Ethics Approach to Computer Games, International Review of Information Ethics, 4 (12), 13-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/irie163

de Smale, S., Kors, M. J. L, Sandovar, A. M. (2017). The Case of This War of Mine: A Production Studies Perspective on Moral Game Design, Games and Culture, 20 (10), 1-23.

Swann, Jr. W. B., Gómez, A., Dovidio, J. F, Hart, S., Jetten, J. (2010). Dying and Killing for One’s Group: Identity Fusion Moderates Responses to Intergroup Versions of the Trolley Problem, Psychological Science, 21 (8), 1176–1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376656

Walzer, M. (2010). Wojny sprawiedliwe i niesprawiedliwe. Rozważania natury moralnej z uwzglęnieniem przykładów historycznych. Warszawa: PWN.

Zagal, J. P. (2009). Ethically Notable Videogames: Moral Dilemmas and Gameplay, Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, -: 1-9.

.11 bit studios. (2014), This War of Oine [Gra Komputerowa], Warszawa.

.11 bit studios. (2016), This War of Mine - The Little Ones DLC [Gra Komputerowa], Warszawa.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2019-03-30

Numer

Dział

Artykuły

Jak cytować

Neumann, Alicja. 2019. “Filozoficzna I Psychologiczna Analiza wyborów Moralnych W Grze This War of Mine”. Hybris 44 (1): 51-65. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.44.04.