The Bored Cossack: The Way of a Ukrainian Warrior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/3071-7779.2025.2.02Słowa kluczowe:
Cossack Mamai, boredom, Ukrainian folk art, social anthropology, Early Modern period, military cultureAbstrakt
The article examines Ukrainian folk paintings of Cossack Mamai as the most complete visual archetype of the Cossack, a professional warrior of the Early Modern period. It argues that Mamai’s static posture and melancholic expression should not be interpreted solely as reflection or sadness, but primarily as a state of boredom, understood in the philosophical sense developed by Martin Heidegger. This boredom emerges from the Cossack’s relationship with time, the steppe landscape, and a psychotype shaped by warfare, isolation, and environmental monotony. An iconographic analysis of key elements (the tree, horse, weapons, bandura, and utensils) shows Mamai as a wealthy, mobile warrior immobilised by enforced rest. The figure is interpreted as one of existential suspension: bored, waiting, aware of purpose yet unable to realise it. In this reading, Mamai becomes a symbol of Ukrainian mentality and of a long-term historical search for identity and meaning.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Alexander R.D. 1987. The Biology of Moral Systems. New York.
Biletskyi P. 1997. Narodni kartyny Kozaky Mamai. “Rodovid” 16, 28–35.
Boredom. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boredom. Available online: 5 August 2018.
Brekhunenko V. 2011. Kozaky na stepovomu kordoni Yevropy: typolohiia kozatskykh spilnot XVI – pershoi polovyny XVII st. Kyiv.
Bushak S. 2008. Kozak Mamai: fenomen odnoho obrazu ta sproba prochytannia yoho kulturnoho “identyfikatsiinoho” kodu. In: Kozak Mamai: Album. Kyiv, 8–119.
Butnyk-Siverskyi B. 1967. Ukraïnske narodne mystetstvo: zhyvopys. Kyiv.
Cáceres J.A.E. 2020. The Art of Boring (Oneself). In: R.J. Velasco (ed.), The Culture of Boredom, 217–235.
Choi J.-K., Bowles S. 2007. The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. “Science” 318, 636–640.
Chukhlib T. 2003. Pereiaslavska uhoda 1654 r. u konteksti mizhnarodnoho utverdzhennia rannomodernoi ukrainskoi derzhavy. “Ukrainskyi Istorychnyi Zhurnal” 3, 47–58.
Čyževskyj D. 1931. Zur Charakterologie der Ukrainer. “Slavische Rundschau” 3, 237–244.
Fehr E., Bernhard H., Rockenbach B. 2008. Egalitarianism in Your Children. “Nature” 454, 1079–1083.
Fenichel O. 1951. On the psychology of boredom. In: D. Rapaport (ed.), Organization and Pathology of Thought. New York, 349–361.
Goldberg Y.K. et al. 2011. Boredom: An Emotional Experience Distinct from Apathy, Anhedonia, or Depression. “Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology” 30, 647–648. https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.6.647. Available online:
12 June 2022.
Halenko O. 2009. Kozak Mamai: fenomen odnoho obrazu ta sproba prochytannia yoho kulturnoho “identyfikatsiinoho” kodu. “Studii Mystetstvoznavchi” 1, 151–158.
Heidegger M. 1995. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Bloomington–Indianapolis.
Hodenko-Nakonechna O. 2010. Mamai-fest u Kamianskom. “Artaniia” 4, 90–94.
Kingwell M. 2019. Wish I Were Here: Boredom and the Interface. Montreal–Kingston–London–Chicago.
“Langeweile”. Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/german-english/langeweile. Available online: 12 June 2022.
Laska I.M. 2007. ‘Kozak Mamai,’ ‘kozak banduryst’. In: V.A. Smolij (ed.), Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy, 4. Kyiv, 405.
Marchenko-Poshyvailo T. 1999. Narodna kartyna Kozak-Mamai, yak polisemantychne uosoblennia svitohliadu ukraintsiv. “Artaniia” 5, 34–39.
Markov A. Evoliutsiia kooperatsii i altruizma: ot bakterii do cheloveka.
https://bio.wikireading.ru/3662. Available online: 12 June 2022.
Mills C.W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York.
Molyn N. 2017. Narodna kartyna “Kozak Mamai” yak dzherelo tvorchosti suchasnykh khudozhnykiv. “Visnyk Lvivskoi Natsionalnoi Akademii Mystetstv” 33, 123–132.
Nuda jest nam bardzo potrzebna. “Gość Niedzielny”. https://www.gosc.pl/doc/4916254.Nuda-jest-nam-bardzo-potrzebna. Available online: 5 August 2018.
“Nudʹha”. 1974. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy, 5. Kyiv, 452.
Rybchyn I. 1970. Dynamika ukrainskoho kozatstva. Munich.
Shashkevych A. 1888. ‘There, where the Yatrahn’ is wreathing steeply. Transl. I. Petryshyn. 24 November 2019. https://lyricstranslate.com/en/там-де-ятрань-круто-в’ється-there-where-yatrahn’-wreathing-steeply”.html
Slavutych Y. 2012. Viiskovyi kostium v ukrainskii kozatskii derzhavi. Kyiv.
Toichkin D. 2013. Klynkova zbroia kozatskoi starshyny XVI – pershoi polovyny XVII st.: problemy atrybutsiyi ta klasyfikatsiyi. Kyiv.
Trivers R.L. 1971. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. “The Quarterly Review of Biology” 46, 35–57.
van Tilburg W.A.P., Igou E.R. 2019. The Unbearable Lightness of Boredom: A Pragmatic Meaning-Regulation Hypothesis. In: R.J. Velasco (ed.), Boredom Is in Your Mind: A Shared Psychological-Philosophical Approach. Cham, 11–35.
Zholtovskyi P. 1978. Ukrainskyi zhyvopys XVII–XVIII st. Kyiv.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
