Hegel, revolution, and the rule of law

Sabrina P.  Ramet

doi:10.18778/1427-9657.09.02

Autor

Sabrina P. Ramet Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, Department of Sociology and Political Science https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2843-3898

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9657.09.02

Słowa kluczowe:

G.W.F. Hegel, philosophy, revolution, rule of law

Abstrakt

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was one of the philosophic giants of the nineteenth century. Well versed in both ancient and more recent philosophical tracts, he rejected the individualism of Hobbes and Locke, as well as their notion that the state was an agency set up in the first place to protect life and property, and, drawing inspiration from Aristotle, outlined a vision of the state as an agency bound, in the first place, to protect the weak and the powerless. Hegel further rejected Kant’s individualistic ethics and counseled that ethical behavior had to be understood as taking place in a social context, with real duties toward other people. For Hegel, an individual had rights and duties within the context of the family, in the community, and, as a citizen, vis-à-vis the state. He emphasized the network of duties in which each individual finds himself, urging political moderation and concern for the good of the entire community. He has been condemned as a proto-totalitarian, lauded as a democrat of sorts, and described variously as liberal, anti-liberal, authoritarian, conservative-monarchist, and constitutionalist. This essay will argue that Hegel came to champion a constitutional-legal order (Rechtsstaat) under an autocratic monarch, with protection for liberal values. The absolute authority of the monarch, thus, was limited to those powers which he needed in order to advance and protect the interests of the citizens of the realm.

Bibliografia

Albrecht, R. 1978. Hegel und die Demokratie. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.

Alcoff, L. 2010. Continental Epistemology. In: J. Dancy, E. Sosa, M. Steup (eds.). A Companion to Epistemology, 2nd ed. Vol. 4. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 287–292.

Avineri, S. 1968. Hegel Revisited. Journal of Contemporary History 3(2), pp. 133–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200946800300208

Avineri, S. 1972. Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171441

Beiser, F.C. (ed.). 1993. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521382742

Brooks, T. 2007. No Rubber Stamp: Hegel’s Constitutional Monarch. History of Political Thought 28(1), pp. 91–119.

Buck-Morss, S. 2000. Hegel and Haiti. Critical Inquiry 26(4), pp. 821–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448993

Buck-Morss, S. 2009. Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zwbgz

Cristi, F.R. 1983. The Hegelsche Mitte and Hegel’s Monarch. Political Theory 11(4), pp. 601–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591783011004007

Cristi, F.R. 1989. Hegel’s Conservative Liberalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 22(4), pp. 717–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900020229

Cristi, F.R. 2005. Hegel on freedom and authority. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

Dancy, J., Sosa, E., Steup, M. (eds.). 2010. A Companion to Epistemology, 2nd ed., Vol. 4. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315080

Durán De Seade, E. 1979. State and History in Hegel’s Concept of People. Journal of the History of Ideas 40(3), pp. 369–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2709243

Ferrarin, A. 2004. Hegel and Aristotle.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferrarin, A. 2007. Hegel and Aristotle.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Garza, Jr.A. 1990–1991. Hegel’s Critique of Liberalism and Natural Law: Reconstructing ethical life. Law and Philosophy 9(4), pp. 371–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212704

Goldstein, L.J. 1962. The Meaning of ‘State’ in Hegel’s Philosophy of History. The Philosophical Quarterly 12(46), pp. 60–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2216840

Hegel, G.W.F. 1953. Reason in History. Trans. R.S. Hartman. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co.

Hegel, G.W.F. 1967a. Philosophy of Right. Trans. T.M. Knox. London & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hegel, G.W.F. 1967b. The Phenomenology of Mind. Trans. J.B. Baillie. New York: Harper & Row.

Hegel, G.W.F. 1969. Hegel’s Science of Logic. Trans. A.V. Miller. London: Allen & Unwin. Reissued by Humanity Books of New York.

Hegel, G.W.F. 1971. The German Constitution. In: Hegel’s Political Writings. 1964. Trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 6–258.

Henrich, D. 1983. Vernunft in Verwirklung. In: G.W.F. Hegel. Philosophie des Rechts. Die Vorlesungen von 1819/20 in einer Nachschrift. D. Henrich (ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Inyang, J. 2005. Hegel’s Idea of the Absolute and African Philosophy. In: Ibuanyidanda (Complementary Reflection), African Philosophy and General Issues in Philosophy, http://www.frasouzu.com/Issues%20and%20Papers/Inyang%20John%20on%20HEGELS%20IDEA%20OF%20THE%20ABSOLUTE%20AND%20AFRICAN%20PHILOSOPHY.pdf (accessed 15.08.2011).

Jaeschke, W. 1981. Christianity and Secularity in Hegel’s Concept of the State. Journal of Religion 61(2), pp. 127–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/486847

Kaufmann, W.A. 1954. Hegel’s Early Antitheological Phase. The Philosophical Review 63(1), pp. 3–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182112

Kelly, G.A. 1972. Hegel’s America. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2(1), pp. 3–36.

Kroner, R. 1921, 1924. Von Kant bis Hegel. 2 Vols. Tübingen: Mohr.

Kroner, R. 1941. God, Nation, and Individual in the Philosophy of Hegel. Philosophy and Phenomenlogical Research 2(2), pp. 188–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2102929

Lichtheim, G. 1967. Introduction to the Torchbook Edition. In: G.W.F. Hegel. The Phenomenology of Mind. Trans. J.B. Baillie. New York: Harper & Row.

Mertens, T. 1995. Hegel’s Homage to Kant’s Perpetual Peace: An Analysis of Hegel’s “Philosophy of Right”. The Review of Politics 57(4), pp. 321–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500018672

Neuhouser, F. 2000. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Nohl, H. (ed.). 1907. Hegels theologische Jugendschriften, nach den Handschriften der Kgl. Bibliothek in Berlin. Tübingen and Frankfurt am Main: Minerva.

Patten, A. 1999. Hegel’s idea of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pelczynski, Z.A. (ed.). 1971. Hegel’s Political Philosophy – problems and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Philosophie des Rechts: Die Vorselung von 1819/290 in einer Nachschrift. 1983. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Pinkard, T. 1986. Freedom and Social Categories in Hegel’s Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47(2), pp. 209–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2107437

Pippin, R.B. 2008. Hegel’s practical philosophy: Rational agency as ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808005

Pippin, R.B. 2011. Hegel on Self-Consciousness: Desire and death in The Phenomenology of Spirit. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836949

Ramet, P. 1983. Kantian and Hegelian Perspectives on Duty. Southern Journal of Philosophy 21(2), pp. 281–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1983.tb01508.x

Ritter, J. 1965. Hegel und die französische Revolution. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Senigaglia, C. 2007. Verfassungseinheit und Gewaltenausgleich: Hegels Auseinandersetzung. Parliaments, Estates and Representation 27(1), pp. 37–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2007.9522252

Shklar, J.N. 1976. Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S.B. 1986. Hegel’s Critique of Liberalism. American Political Science Review 80(1), pp. 121–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1957087

Smith, S.B. 1989a. Hegel’s Critique of Liberalism: Rights in Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Smith, S.B. 1989b. What is ‘Right’ in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right? American Political Science Review 83(1), pp. 3–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1956431

Stillman, P.G. 1974. Hegel’s Critique of Liberal Theories of Rights. American Political Science Review 68(3), pp. 1086–1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1959149

Stillman, P.G. 1980. Hegel’s Civil Society: A Locus of Freedom. Polity 12(4), pp. 622–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3234303

Suter, J.F. 1971. Burke, Hegel, and the French Revolution. In: Z.A. Pelczynski (ed.). Hegel’s Political Philosophy – problems and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–72.

Taylor, C. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, C. 1979. Hegel and Modern Society. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286630

Taylor, C. 2008. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, C. 2015. Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tunick, M. 1998. Hegel on Justified Disobedience. Political Theory 26(4), pp. 514–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591798026004004

Westphal, K. 1993. The basic context and structure of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. In: F.C. Beiser (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521382742.009

Wiedmann, F. 2003. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.

Wokler, R. 1998. Contextualizing Hegel’s Phenomenology of the French Revolution and the Terror. Political Theory 26(1), pp. 33–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591798026001003

Wood, A.W. 1990. Hegel’s ethical thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wood, A.W. 1993. Hegel’s ethics. In: F.C. Beiser (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521382742.008