Corporate Social Resposonsibility w kontekście imperatywu kategorycznego Kanta

Krzysztof Tapek

doi:10.18778/1899-2226.19.1.01

Autor

Krzysztof Tapek Jagiellonian University, Chair of Economic Policy on Department of Law and Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.19.1.01

Słowa kluczowe:

categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant, Corporate Social Responsibility, business ethics

Abstrakt

Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, especially his categorical imperative, is one of several ethical theories mainly used to morally legitimize actions, referred to as Corporate Social Responsibility. The aim of the current article is to evaluate if Kant’s philosophy can be used as the ethical foundation for Corporate Social Responsibility as well as to present its advantages and disadvantages in a theoretical and practical approach.

Bibliografia

Albert E., T. Denise, S. Peterfreund, Great Traditions in Ethics, Van Nostrand, Nowy Jork, 1980.

Carroll A.B., The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, „Business Horizons” 1991, vol. 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Chryssides G., J. Kaler, Wprowadzenie do etyki biznesu, tłum. H. Simbierowicz, Z. Wiankowska-Ładyka, PWN, Warszawa 1999.

Dubbink W., L. von Liedekerke, A Neo-Kantian Foundation of Corporate Social Responsibility, „Ethic Theory and Moral Practice” 2009, vol. 12, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9138-2

Fredriksen C., M. Nielsen, The Ethical Foundations of CSR [w:] Corporate Social Responsibility Challenges, Opportunities and Strategies for 21st Century Leaders, red. J. Okpara, S.O. Idowu, Springer, Berlin 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40975-2, s. 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40975-2

Friedman M., The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, „New York Times Magazine” 1970, September 13.

Hill T.E., Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1992.

Hill T.E., Human Welfare and Human Worth: Kantian Perspective, Clarendon Press, Nowy Jork 2002.

Hill T.E., Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation, „Kant-Studien” 1971, vol. 62, s. 55–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1971.62.1-4.55

Kant I., Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Nowy Jork, Melbourne 1991.

Kant I., Uzasadnienie metafizyki moralności, tłum. M. Wartenberg, Antyk, Kęty 2001.

L’Etang J., A Kantian Approach to Codes of Ethics, „Journal of Business Ethics” 1992, vol. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872305

Mansell S., Shareholder Theory and Kant’s „Duty of Beneficience”, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2013, vol. 117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1542-9

Masaka D., Why Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Is Morally Questionable, „Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies” 2008, vol. 13, nr 1.

Masulis R.W., S. W. Reza, Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy, „The Review of Financial Studies” 2015, vol. 28, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu082

McWilliams A., D. Siegel, P. Wright, Guest Editors’ Introduction, Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, „Journal of Management Studies” 2006/1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

Mendes E., The Moral Argument Against the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Call for a New Moral and Spiritual Approach, Uniwersytet w Ottawie, 2007, http://www.ucalgary.ca/christchair/files/christchair/Mendes-detailed-paper.pdf.

Ohreen D., R. Petry, Imperfect Duties and Corporate Philanthropy: A Kantian Approach, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2012, vol. 106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1002-y

Oplustil K., Instrumenty nadzoru korporacyjnego (corporate governance) w spółce akcyjnej, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2010.

Wicks A.C., Norman Bowie and Richard Rorty on Multinationals: Does Business Ethics Need „Metaphysical Comfort”?, „Journal of Business Ethics” 1990, vol. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382644

Bauder M., Władca wszechświata (tytuł oryginalny: Der Banker: Master of the Universe), 3sat/ARTE, Bauderfilm, Hessischer Rundfunk, Niemcy-Austria, 2013.

http://mhcinternational.com/monthly-features/articles/95-csr-in-turbulent-times

http://www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/esg-reporting/env-report-2008.pdf

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/27/shitty-deal-goldman-exec_n_553541.html

http://www.pfizer.com.pl/o-firmie/wartosci-firmy-i-spoleczna-odpowiedzialnosc

https://www.db.com/poland/pl/content/filozofia_biznesu.html

http://biznes.newsweek.pl/luksemburg-leaks-ktore-firmy-uciekly-z-podatkami-do-luksemburga-,artykuly,351344,1.html

http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/publikacje/badanie-menedzerowie-500lider-csr/