Corporate Social Resposonsibility w kontekście imperatywu kategorycznego Kanta

Krzysztof Tapek

doi:10.18778/1899-2226.19.1.01

Autor

Krzysztof Tapek Jagiellonian University, Chair of Economic Policy on Department of Law and Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.19.1.01

Słowa kluczowe:

categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant, Corporate Social Responsibility, business ethics

Abstrakt

Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, especially his categorical imperative, is one of several ethical theories mainly used to morally legitimize actions, referred to as Corporate Social Responsibility. The aim of the current article is to evaluate if Kant’s philosophy can be used as the ethical foundation for Corporate Social Responsibility as well as to present its advantages and disadvantages in a theoretical and practical approach.

Bibliografia

Albert E., T. Denise, S. Peterfreund, Great Traditions in Ethics, Van Nostrand, Nowy Jork, 1980.
Google Scholar

Carroll A.B., The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, „Business Horizons” 1991, vol. 34.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Chryssides G., J. Kaler, Wprowadzenie do etyki biznesu, tłum. H. Simbierowicz, Z. Wiankowska-Ładyka, PWN, Warszawa 1999.
Google Scholar

Dubbink W., L. von Liedekerke, A Neo-Kantian Foundation of Corporate Social Responsibility, „Ethic Theory and Moral Practice” 2009, vol. 12, nr 2.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9138-2

Fredriksen C., M. Nielsen, The Ethical Foundations of CSR [w:] Corporate Social Responsibility Challenges, Opportunities and Strategies for 21st Century Leaders, red. J. Okpara, S.O. Idowu, Springer, Berlin 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40975-2, s. 17–34.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40975-2

Friedman M., The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, „New York Times Magazine” 1970, September 13.
Google Scholar

Hill T.E., Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1992.
Google Scholar

Hill T.E., Human Welfare and Human Worth: Kantian Perspective, Clarendon Press, Nowy Jork 2002.
Google Scholar

Hill T.E., Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation, „Kant-Studien” 1971, vol. 62, s. 55–76.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1971.62.1-4.55

Kant I., Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Nowy Jork, Melbourne 1991.
Google Scholar

Kant I., Uzasadnienie metafizyki moralności, tłum. M. Wartenberg, Antyk, Kęty 2001.
Google Scholar

L’Etang J., A Kantian Approach to Codes of Ethics, „Journal of Business Ethics” 1992, vol. 11.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872305

Mansell S., Shareholder Theory and Kant’s „Duty of Beneficience”, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2013, vol. 117.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1542-9

Masaka D., Why Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Is Morally Questionable, „Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies” 2008, vol. 13, nr 1.
Google Scholar

Masulis R.W., S. W. Reza, Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy, „The Review of Financial Studies” 2015, vol. 28, nr 2.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu082

McWilliams A., D. Siegel, P. Wright, Guest Editors’ Introduction, Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, „Journal of Management Studies” 2006/1.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

Mendes E., The Moral Argument Against the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Call for a New Moral and Spiritual Approach, Uniwersytet w Ottawie, 2007, http://www.ucalgary.ca/christchair/files/christchair/Mendes-detailed-paper.pdf.
Google Scholar

Ohreen D., R. Petry, Imperfect Duties and Corporate Philanthropy: A Kantian Approach, „Journal of Business Ethics” 2012, vol. 106.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1002-y

Oplustil K., Instrumenty nadzoru korporacyjnego (corporate governance) w spółce akcyjnej, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar

Wicks A.C., Norman Bowie and Richard Rorty on Multinationals: Does Business Ethics Need „Metaphysical Comfort”?, „Journal of Business Ethics” 1990, vol. 9.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382644

Bauder M., Władca wszechświata (tytuł oryginalny: Der Banker: Master of the Universe), 3sat/ARTE, Bauderfilm, Hessischer Rundfunk, Niemcy-Austria, 2013.
Google Scholar

http://mhcinternational.com/monthly-features/articles/95-csr-in-turbulent-times
Google Scholar

http://www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/esg-reporting/env-report-2008.pdf
Google Scholar

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/27/shitty-deal-goldman-exec_n_553541.html
Google Scholar

http://www.pfizer.com.pl/o-firmie/wartosci-firmy-i-spoleczna-odpowiedzialnosc
Google Scholar

https://www.db.com/poland/pl/content/filozofia_biznesu.html
Google Scholar

http://biznes.newsweek.pl/luksemburg-leaks-ktore-firmy-uciekly-z-podatkami-do-luksemburga-,artykuly,351344,1.html
Google Scholar

http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/publikacje/badanie-menedzerowie-500lider-csr/
Google Scholar