Socjologia a praktyka rozwiązywania problemów społecznych – między naukowymi a nieformalnymi teoriami problemów społecznych

Iwona Kudlińska

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.50.08

Authors

Iwona Kudlińska Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Ekonomiczno- Socjologiczny, Katedra Socjologii Stosowanej i Pracy Socjalnej, Instytut Socjologii

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.50.08

Keywords:

formal theories, informal theories, practice wisdom, sociology of social problems, social constructionism

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the interrelationships between social sciences (especially sociological theories of social problems) and practice in solving contemporary social problems. Shall be indicated that nowadays link between a theory and its understanding and application in practice is not evident and might not even exist. This situation maintains because sociologists fear that getting involved in practice may seem to be unprofessional and demean their work’s value as science. On the other hand, practitioners in social services are more likely to be critical and unwilling to apply academic theories into practice, they are more likely to build informal/ practice theories and guide by the “practice wisdom”.

In the paper research findings about the process of social constructing of parental upbringing inefficiency were examined as the example of informal theories. Both formal and informal theories are similar (they include definitions of social problems, their causes, possible solutions and an example) and perform similar functions. Both of them interpenetrate, their aim is to build significant stories of the social problem and to convince the society to suggested solutions of the problem.

The aim of the article, referring to academic literature and author’s research analyzes, is to enable to answer the question how private and practice-driven theories become social constructs that provide guidance on social workers’ professional activity in a way academic formal theories do. Informal theories on one hand may be seem as an eclectic approach, but on the other hand they can be powerful force that make social work into a ritual that reaffirms and perpetuates the problematic condition.

References

Arendell T. (2000), Conceiving and Investigating Motherhood: The Decade’s Scholarship, „Journal of Marriage and the Family”, Vol. 62, No. 4, s. 1192–1207.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01192.x

Argyris C., Schon D. (1974), Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, Jossey‒Bass, San Francisco.
Google Scholar

Beckett Ch. (2010), Podstawy teorii dla praktyków pracy socjalnej, Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Burawoy M. (2005), 2004 ASA Presidential Address – For Public Sociology, „American Sociological Review”, February, Vol. 70, pp. 4–28, polska wersja: http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/PS/Translations/Poland/ASA.Polish.pdf, 5.04.2014.
Google Scholar

Frysztacki K. (2009), Socjologia problemów społecznych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Gray M., Webb S. (2012), Praca socjalna. Teorie i metody, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Howe D. (2011), Krótkie wprowadzenie do teorii pracy socjalnej, Instytut Rozwoju Służb Społecznych, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Jamrozik A., Nocella L. (2000), The Sociology of Social Problems: Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Kantowicz E. (2005), Praca socjalna w Europie. Inspiracje teoretyczne i standardy kształcenia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie, Olsztyn.
Google Scholar

Knight B. (1996), Reflecting on ‘reflective practice’, „Studies in the Education of Adults”, Vol. 28, No. 2, s. 162‒184.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.1996.11730638

Lishman (1996), Podręcznik teorii dla nauczycieli praktyki w pracy socjalnej, [tłum. Krzysztof Czekaj], Wydawnictwo Naukowe „Śląsk”, Katowice.
Google Scholar

Miś L. (2007), Problemy społeczne: teoria, metodologia, badania, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Payne M. (2005), Modern social work theory, Lyceum Books, Chicago.
Google Scholar

Pryjmachuk S. (1996), A nursing perspective on the interrelationships between theory, research and practice, „Journal of Advanced Nursing”, No. 23, s. 679–684.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00037.x

Rubington E., Weinberg M. (2003), The Study of Social Problems: Seven Perspectives, 7th Ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar

Sasson T. (1995), Crime Talk, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne (NY).
Google Scholar

Sibeon R. (1990), Comments on the Structure and Forms of Social Work Knowledge, „Social Work and Social Sciences Review”, Vol. 1, No. 1, s. 29–44.
Google Scholar

Spector M., Kitsuse J. (1973a), Social Problems: A Reformulation, „Social Problems”, Vol. 21, No. 2, s. 145–159.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1973.21.2.03a00010

Spector M., Kitsuse J. (1973b), Toward a Sociology of Social Problems: Social Condition, Value Judgments and Social Problems, „Social Problems”, Vol. 20, No. 4, s. 407–419.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/799704

Surette R. (2011), Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice. Images, Realities, and Policies, 4th Ed., Cengage Learning, Wadsworth.
Google Scholar

Szatur-Jaworska B. (1995), Teoretyczne podstawy pracy socjalnej, [w:] T. Pilch, I. Lepalczyk (red.), Pedagogika społeczna. Człowiek w zmieniającym się świecie, Wydawnictwo Akademickie „Żak”, Warszawa, s. 106–122.
Google Scholar

Sztompka P. (1971), O pojęciu teorii w socjologii, „Studia Socjologiczne”, nr 3, s. 19–52.
Google Scholar

Sztompka P. (1985), Teoria socjologiczna końca XX wieku. Wstęp do wydania polskiego, [w:] J. H. Turner, Struktura teorii socjologicznej, PWN, Warszawa, s. 9–53.
Google Scholar

Walls L., Wong-Wylie G. (2007), The social construction of motherhood: Implications and interventions, research paper presented at the Association for Research on Mothering’s 11th Annual Conference: „Maternal Health and Well-Being”, October 19‒21, 2007, Toronto, Canada.
Google Scholar