The Return of the Surreal: Towards a Poetic and Playful Sociology

Authors

  • Victoria Foster Edge Hill University, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.1.07

Keywords:

Arts-Based Methods, Critical Social Science, Feminism, Humor, Poetics, Research Methodology, Surrealism

Abstract

This article argues that the time is ripe to reacquaint sociology and surrealism. Taking inspiration from surrealism’s emphasis on making the ordinary strange through bizarre, lively and sometimes haunting methods might result in a more poetic and playful sociology. The article looks at how this might be applied in practice through drawing on a variety of examples of social research that share some of the tenets of surrealism, not least the latter’s focus on social justice. This enables discussion of a number of methodological concerns stemming from feminist and post-structuralist thought, including the troubling of narrative coherency and the notion of “voice.” Infusing sociology with “a surrealist spirit” requires opening up and moving away from rationality in ways that allow for the exploration of contradictions, irreverence, humor, and paradox.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Victoria Foster, Edge Hill University, UK

    Victoria Foster is a Senior Lecturer in Social Sciences at Edge Hill University, UK. She has a particular interest in collaborative, arts-based approaches to research with community groups. She is also the Associate Director of Edge Hill University’s Institute for Public Policy and Professional Practice (I4P) which involves facilitating meaningful knowledge exchange between academics, practitioners, policy makers, and communities.

References

Adamowicz, Elza. 1998. Surrealist Collage in Text and Image: Dissecting the Exquisite Corpse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Atkinson, Paul. 2013. “Ethnography and Craft Knowledge.” Qualitative Sociology Review 9(2):56-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.2.06

Back, Les. 2012. “Live Sociology: Social Research and Its Futures.” Pp. 18-39 in Live Methods, edited by L. Back and N. Puwar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02115.x

Back, Les and Nirmal Puwar. 2012. “A Manifesto for Live Methods: Provocations and Capacities.” Pp. 6-17 in Live Methods, edited by L. Back and N. Puwar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02114.x

Banks, Anna. 2016. “Animal Narrativity: Lived Experiences in the More Than Human World.” Pp. 63-78 in Sharing Qualitative Research: Showing Lived Experiences and Community Narratives, edited by S. Gair, A. Van Luyn. Abingdon: Routledge.

Basting, Anne D. 2001. “‘God Is a Talking Horse’: Dementia and the Performance of Self.” The Drama Review 45(3):78-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/10542040152587123

Bhattacharya, Kakali. 2008. “Voices Lost and Found: Using Found Poetry in Qualitative Research.” Pp. 83-88 in Arts-Based Research in Education, edited by M. Cahnmann-Taylor and R. Siegesmund. New York: Routledge.

Brotchie, Alastair and Mel Gooding, (eds.). 1995. Surrealist Games. Boston, London: Shambhala Redstone Editions.

Butler-Kisber, Lynn. 2008. “Collage as Inquiry.” Pp. 265-278 in Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research, edited by G. J. Knowles and A. L. Cole. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226545.n22

Calvino, Italo. 1997. Invisible Cities. London: Vintage.

Capous-Desyllas, Moshoula. 2015. “Collage as Reflexivity: Illustrations and Reflections of a Photovoice Study with Sex Workers.” Pp. 189-208 in Feminisms in Social Work Research, edited by S. Wahab, B. Anderson-Nathe, and C. Gringeri. Abingdon: Routledge.

Carrette, Jeremy R. 2000. Foucault and Religion. London: Routledge.

Chadwick, Whitney. 1985. Women Artists and the Surrealist Movement. London: Thames and Hudson.

Chaplin, Elizabeth. 2005. “The Photograph in Theory.” Sociological Research Online 10(1). Retrieved March 22, 2012 ( http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/chaplin.html ). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.964

Clifford, James. 1981. “On Ethnographic Surrealism.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 23(4):539-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500013554

Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674503724

Conquergood, Dwight. 2002. “Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research.” The Drama Review 46(2):145-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/105420402320980550

Daley, Andrea. 2010. “Reflections on Reflexivity and Critical Reflection as Critical Research Practices.” Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work 25(1):68-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109909354981

Debord, Guy-Ernest. 1958. “Theory of the Derive.” Internationale Situationniste #2. Retrieved July 09, 2016 (http://library.nothingness.org/articles/all/en/display/314).

Douglas, Caroline. 2011. Transmitter Receiver: The Persistence of Collage. London: Hayward Gallery Publishing.

Foster, Hal. 1996. The Return of the Real. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Foster, Victoria. 2016. Collaborative Arts-Based Research for Social Justice. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203077450

Foucault, Michel. 2002 [1966]. The Order of Things. London: Routledge Classics.

Foucault, Michel. 2008 [1968]. This Is Not a Pipe. Berkley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Gadd, Shannon. 2015. “Surrealism. The Cultural History of Philosophy Blog.” School of History, Queen Mary University of London. Retrieved September 16, 2016(http://blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk/philosophy/2015/11/29/surrealism/).

Greene, Maxine. 2000. Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts, and Social Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspectives.” Feminist Studies 14(3):575-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Highmore, Ben. 2002. Everyday Life and Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464229

Highmore, Ben. 2005. “Unprocessed Data: Everyday Life in the Singular.” Pp. 6-11 in Day-to-Day Data, edited by E. Harrison, J. Waters, and H. Jones. Nottingham: Angel Row Gallery.

Hubble, Nick. 2012. “Imagism, Realism, Surrealism: Middlebrow Transformations in the Mass-Observation Project.” Pp. 202-230 in Middlebrow Literary Cultures, edited by E. Brown and M. Grover. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354647_13

Humphreys, Karen. 2006. “Collages Communicants: Visual Representation in the cCollage-Albums of Max Ernst and Valentine Penrose.” Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 10(4):377-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17409290601040379

Hurdley, Rachel. 2014. “Synthetic Sociology and the ‘Long Workshop’: How Mass Observation Ruined Meta-Methodology.” Sociological Research Online 19(3):6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3376

Jaggar, Alison M. 1989. “Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology.” Inquiry 32(2):151-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748908602185

Kafar, Marcin and Carolyn Ellis. 2014. “Autoethnography, Storytelling, and Life as Lived: A Conversation Between Marcin Kafar and Carolyn Ellis.” Qualitative Sociology Review 10(3):126-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.10.3.06

LaCoss, Don. 2005. “Hysterical Freedom: Surrealist Dance & Hélène Vanel’s Faulty Functions.” Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 15(2):37-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07407700508571504

Lather, Patti. 2010. Engaging Science Policy: From the Side of the Messy. New York: Peter Lang.

Latimer, Joanna and Beverley Skeggs. 2011. “The Politics of Imagination: Keeping Open and Critical.” The Sociological Review 59(3):393-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02024.x

MacLure, Maggie. 2009. “Broken Voices, Dirty Words: On the Productive Insufficiency of Voice.” Pp. 97-114 in Voice in Qualitative Inquiry, edited by A. Y. Jackson and L. A. Mazzei. Abingdon: Routledge.

Mass Observation. 2016. “Mass Observation Project Directives.” Retrieved September 08, 2016 (http://www.massobs.org.uk/mass-observation-project-directives).

Mazzei, Lisa A. and Alecia Y. Jackson. 2009. “Introduction: The Limits of Voice.” Pp. 1-14 in Voice in Qualitative Inquiry, edited by A. Y. Jackson and L. A. Mazzei. Abingdon: Routledge.

Mengham, Rod. 2001. “Bourgeois News: Humphrey Jennings and Charles Madge.” New Formations 44 (Autumn):26-33.

Metcalf, Sarah. 2011. “Playing Memory Games.” Phosphor no. 3. Winter.

Moles, Kate. 2008. “A Walk in Thirdspace: Place, Methods and Walking.” Sociological Research Online 13(4)2. Retrieved July 03, 2016 (http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/4/2.html). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1745

Nadeau, Maurice. 1973. The History of Surrealism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Nash, Catherine J. and Kath Browne, (eds.). 2016. Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223

Neal, Sarah and Karim Murji. 2015. “Sociologies of Everyday Life: Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue.” Sociology 49(5):811-819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515602160

Pink, Sarah. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857025029

Pollen, Annebella. 2013. “Research Methodology in Mass Observation Past and Present: ‘Scientifically, About as Valuable as a Chimpanzee’s Tea Party at the Zoo?’” History Workshop Journal 75:213-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbs040

Rasberry, G. W. 2002. “Imagine: Inventing a Data-Dancer.” Pp. 105-120 in Dancing the Data, edited by C. Bagley and M. B. Cancienne. New York: Peter Lang.

Rosemont, Penelope, (ed.). 1998. Surrealist Women: An International Anthology. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Shaw, Jenny. 1996. “Surrealism, Mass-Observation and Researching Imagination.” Pp. 1-16 in Methodological Imaginations, edited by E. Stina Lyon and J. Busfield. Houndmills: Macmillan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24547-5_1

Sheringham, Michael. 2006. Everyday Life: Theories and Practices from Surrealism to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, Zadie. 2010. “Generation Why?” The New York Review of Books November 25.

Sprague, Joey. 2016. Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.

St. Pierre, Elizabeth A. 2009. “Afterword: Decentering Voice in Qualitative Inquiry.” Pp. 221-236 in Voice in Qualitative Inquiry, edited by A. Y. Jackson and L. A. Mazzei. Abingdon: Routledge.

Watson, Cate. 2015. “A Sociologist Walks into a Bar (and other academic challenges): Towards a Methodology of Humor.” Sociology 49(3):407-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513516694

Young Mallin, Judith. 1991. “Eileen Agar.” Pp. 213-227 in Surrealism and Women, edited by M. A. Caws, R. Kuenzli, and G. Raaberg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Foster, Victoria. 2019. “The Return of the Surreal: Towards a Poetic and Playful Sociology”. Qualitative Sociology Review 15 (1): 148-64. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.1.07.