Navigating Recognition: The Symbolic Struggles in the Biographies of Young Polish Internet Content Creators

Kamil Łuczaj

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.21.2.05

Authors

Kamil Łuczaj University of Lodz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1603-3259

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.21.2.05

Keywords:

Recognition, Symbolic Struggle, Internet Content Creators, Hate Speech, Social Field

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the symbolic struggles embedded in the biographies of internet content creators. Pursuing a relatively new profession that lacks symbolic legitimization necessitates both explanatory and emotional labor to justify a “biographical action scheme” that does not align with existing “institutionalized schedules for organizing biographies,” in Fritz Schütze’s sense. Drawing on interviews with young Polish internet content creators, I analyze these struggles through the lens of Axel Honneth’s concept of the “struggle for recognition” and Michèle Lamont’s notion of “symbolic boundaries.”

The empirical analysis suggests that the initial struggle involves proving their worth to close family and friends, who may question the legitimacy of being an influencer compared to a stable 9-to-5 job. This tension is particularly pronounced in intergenerational relationships, such as between children and their parents. The second struggle occurs between content creators and their audiences. Here, the challenge is defending oneself against justified or unjustified accusations and hate speech. The third struggle is inherent to those operating at the intersection of various social fields. For these influencers, who build their content on popular science, the lack of recognition or hostility from the academic community is another serious biographical problem.

The necessity to engage in constant power struggles, which demand considerable skill, challenges the widespread perception of internet influencing as a “childish” profession—one that offers an enjoyable job paired with undeservedly high earnings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kamil Łuczaj, University of Lodz

Kamil Łuczaj is a sociologist specializing in migration studies and the sociology of higher education. He earned his Ph.D. from Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland, and his habilitation from the University of Lodz, Poland, where he currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Sociology. He has held visiting positions at the University of New Mexico (2013-2014), the Slovak Academy of Sciences (2018, Institute of Sociology), the University of Cambridge (2020-2021, Faculty of Education), and the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign (2022, Russian, East European, and Eurasian Center). He was also a Ludovika Rector’s Annual Lecturer at the Ludovika University of Public Service in Budapest (2022). His research expertise includes qualitative interviewing and ethnographic methods. He has led multiple research projects on academic migration and the academic profession. His work has been published in high-impact journals such as Studies in Higher Education, International Journal of Sociology of Education, Geoforum, English for Specific Purposes, and Higher Education Policy.

References

Bachórz, Agata. 2023. “‘Rzuciła pracę w korpo i zajęła się… gotowaniem.’ Praca z jedzeniem, nieoczywiste transformacje zawodowe i poszukiwanie alternatywnej relacji ze światem [‘She Quit Her Corporate Job and Took Up… Cooking.’ Professional Food Work, Unobvious Career Shifts, and the Search for an Alternative Relationship with the World].” Studia Socjologiczne 1(248):59-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2023.144834

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. “What Makes a Social Class? On The Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32:1-17.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1994. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. On Television. New York: New Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. “The Political Field, Social Science Field, and the Journalistic Field.” Pp. 29-47 in Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, edited by R. Benson and E. Neveu. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Butler, Nick, Shiona Chillas, and Sara Louise Muhr. 2012. “Professions at the Margins.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 12(3):259-272.

Campanella, Bruno. 2024. Recognition in the Age of Social Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Castaño-Pulgarín, Sergio A. et al. 2021. “Internet, Social Media, and Online Hate Speech: Systematic Review.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 58:101608. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608

Cicchelli, Vincenzo et al. 2023. “Because We All Love K-Pop: How Young Adults Reshape Symbolic Boundaries in Paris, Manchester, and Philadelphia.” The British Journal of Sociology 74(1):17-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12983

Cohen, Andrew C. and Shai M. Dromi. 2018. “Advertising Morality: Maintaining Moral Worth in a Stigmatized Profession.” Theory and Society 47:175-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9309-7

Domański, Henryk et al. 2021. Dystynkcje muzyczne. Stratyfikacja społeczna i gusty muzyczne Polaków [Musical Distinctions. Social Stratification and Musical Tastes of Poles]. Warsaw: Scholar.

Domecka, Markieta et al. 2012. “Method in Practice: Autobiographical Narrative Interviews in Search of European Phenomena.” Pp. 15-30 in The Evolution of European Identities: Identities and Modernities in Europe, edited by R. Miller and G. Day. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009272_2

Dopierała, Renata. 2023. “Jak zostaje się osobą z internetu? Twórcy internetowi w perspektywie (technologicznej) koncepcji pokoleń [How to Become a Person from the Internet? Digital Creators in the Perspective of the (Technological) Concept of Generations].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 19(4):92-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.19.4.05

Drewski, Daniel. 2023. “Language and Symbolic Boundaries among Transnational Elites: A Qualitative Case Study of European Commission Officials.” Global Networks 24(3):e12434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12434

Giles, Douglas. 2020. Rethinking Misrecognition and Struggles for Recognition: Critical Theory Beyond Honneth. Prague: Insert Philosophy.

Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry 18(3):213-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008

Grodny, Seweryn, Jerzy Gruszka, and Kamil Łuczaj. 2013. “O zawężeniu wyższego gustu estetycznego. Analiza zjawiska wszystkożerności kulturowej w Polsce [Narrowing of Highbrow Taste. Analysis of Cultural Omnivorousness in Poland].” Studia Socjologiczne 2:127-148.

Hemming Pedersen, Leif. 2022. “Furries, Freestylers, and the Engine of Social Change: The Struggle for Recognition in a Mediatized World.” Communications 47:590-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0047

Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85:551-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049

Hołówka, Teresa. 1997. Delicje Ciotki Dee [Aunt Dee’s Delights]. Warsaw: Prószyński i S-ka.

Honneth, Axel. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kaźmierska, Kaja. 2025. “The Biographical Experience of Being a Stay-at-Home Mother of a Large Family Versus Online Activity. A Case Study.” Qualitative Sociology Review 21(2):34-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.21.2.03

Kaźmierska, Kaja and Joanna Wygnańska. 2019. “Workshops as an Essential Practice in Doing Biographical Research.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 15(2):164-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.15.2.09

Kozinets, Robert V., Ulrike Gretzel, and Rossella Gambetti. 2023. Influencers & Creators: Business, Culture and Practice. London: Sage.

Lamont, Michèle. 1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922591.001.0001

Lamont, Michèle. 2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lamont, Michèle, Sabrina Pendergrass, and Mark Pachucki. 2015. “Symbolic Boundaries.” Pp. 850-855 in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by J. Wright. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10416-7

Lavelle, John. 2007. “On Workforce Architecture, Employment Relationships and Lifecycles.” Public Personnel Management 36(4):371-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600703600406

Luczaj, Kamil. 2016. “Is It Possible to Be a Commercial Artist? Dilemmas Faced by Advertising Industry Employees with Artistic Backgrounds in Poland.” Advertising & Society Review 16(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/asr.2016.0002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/asr.2016.0002

Łuczaj, Kamil. 2020. “Lowbrows as Rebels: Under What Circumstances a ‘Low’ Musical Genre Can Change Its Cultural Value? The Case of Disco Polo and Populism in Poland.” Social Communication 6(1):106-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sc-2020-0011

Misiak, Michal et al. 2025. “Who Wants to Be a YouTuber? Personality Traits Predict the Desire to Become a Social Media Influencer.” Telematics and Informatics 9 8:102248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102248

Pugh, Allison J. 2013. “What Good Are Interviews for Thinking about Culture? Demystifying Interpretive Analysis.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 1:42-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2012.4

Schütze, Fritz. 1983. “Biographieforschung und narratives Interview [Biographical Research and Narrative Interview].” Neue Praxis 13(3):283-293.

Schütze, Fritz. 2014. “Autobiographical Accounts of War Experiences: An Outline for the Analysis of Topically Focused Autobiographical Texts—Using the Example of the ‘Robert Rasmus’ Account in Studs Terkel’s Book, The Good War.” Qualitative Sociology Review 10(1):224-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.1.10

Sølvberg, Lisa M. and Vegard Jarness. 2019. “Assessing Contradictions: Methodological Challenges when Mapping Symbolic Boundaries.” Cultural Sociology 13(2):178-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975518819907

Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554

Stebbins, Robert A. 2014. Careers in Serious Leisure: From Dabbler to Devotee in Search of Fulfilment. New Brunswick, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Strauss, Anselm L. and Howard S. Becker. 1975. “Careers, Personality, and Adult Socialization.” Pp. 81-96 in Professions, Work and Careers, edited by A. L. Strauss. New York: Routledge.

Streib, Jessi. 2011. “Class Reproduction by Four Year Old.” Qualitative Sociology 34:337-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9193-1

SW Research. 2024a. “Aktualny Ranking Najbardziej Poważanych Zawodów [Current Ranking of the Most Respected Professions].” Retrieved May 22, 2024, https://swresearch.pl/ranking-zawodow.

SW Research. 2024b. “Najbardziej i najmniej prestiżowe zawody 2024 [Most and Least Prestigious Professions 2024].” Retrieved January 30, 2025, https://swresearch.pl/news/najbardziej-i-najmniej-prestizowe-zawody-z-perspektywy-polakow-w-2024.

Zarycki, Tomasz. 2008. Kapitał Kulturowy. Inteligencja w Polsce i Rosji [Cultural Capital. Intelligentsia in Poland and Russia]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo UW. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323517016

Żuchowska-Skiba, Dorota. 2023. “Slacktivism.” Pp. 1-4 in Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality, edited by J. Marques. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_50-1