Recording Solo: Managing Long-Distance Data Collection within Audio Diary Research with Healthcare Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.21.3.04Keywords:
Audio-Diary, Remote Social Research, Healthcare Professionals, Long-Distance ReflexivityAbstract
This paper explores the methodological and reflexive implications of using audio diaries in remote qualitative research with healthcare professionals. Drawing on a three-month study involving 18 participants who submitted audio recordings weekly, complemented by follow-up interviews, the article examines how this method enables the collection of rich, emotionally nuanced, and temporally proximate narratives. The audio diary format proved particularly effective for engaging professionals under high emotional and organizational pressure, offering a flexible and participant-led space for reflection. The study also sheds light on the challenges of sustaining participation over time, the importance of ethical responsiveness, and the role of the researcher in supporting engagement at a distance. Ultimately, the paper proposes the concept of long-distance reflexivity to describe how both participants and researchers negotiate meaning, presence, and vulnerability in fully remote research settings.
Downloads
References
Aagaard, Jasper. 2022. “On the Dynamics of Zoom Fatigue.” Convergence 28(6):1878-1891.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221099711
Almeida, David M. 2005. “Resilience and Vulnerability to Daily Stressors Assessed via Diary Methods.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 14(2):64-68.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x
Andersen, Ditte, Signe Ravn, and Rachel Thomson. 2020. “Narrative Sense-Making and Prospective Social Action: Methodological Challenges and New Directions.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 23(4):367-375.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1723204
Ashmore, Malcolm. 1989. The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Bartlett, Ruth. 2012. “Modifying the Diary Interview Method to Research the Lives of People with Dementia.” Qualitative Health Research 22(12):1717-1726.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312462240
Bartlett, Ruth and Christine Milligan. 2015. What Is Diary Method? London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472572578
Bernays, Sarah, Tim Rhodes, and Katarina Jankovic Terzic. 2014. “Embodied Accounts of HIV and Hope: Using Audio Diaries with Interviews.” Qualitative Health Research 24(5):629- 640.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314528812
Bernays, Sarah et al. 2019. “A Failed Method? Reflections on Using Audio Diaries in Uganda with Young People Growing Up with HIV in the BREATHER Trial.” Qualitative Health Research 29(5):719-730.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318813534
Bondi, Liz. 2005. “The Place of Emotions in Research: From Partitioning Emotion and Reason to the Emotional Dynamics of Research Relationships.” Pp. 231-246 in Emotional Geographies, edited by J. Davidson, L. Bondi, and M. Smith. New York: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Bornat, Joanna and Bill Bytheway. 2012. “Working with Different Temporalities: Archived Life History Interviews and Diaries.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(4):291-299.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.688312
Bryman, Alan. 2001. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” Pp. 249-291 in Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Crozier, Sarah E. and Catherine M. Cassell. 2016. “Methodological Considerations in the Use of Audio Diaries in Work Psychology: Adding to the Qualitative Toolkit.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 89(2):396-419.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12132
de Lanerolle, Indra, Alette Schoon, and Marion Walton. 2020. “Researching Mobile Phones in the Everyday Life of the ‘Less Connected’: The Development of a New Diary Method.” African Journalism Studies 41(4):35-50.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2020.1813785
Denzin, Norman K. 1970. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. 1997. Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243672
Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Ellis, Carolyn. 2007. “Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others.” Qualitative Inquiry 13(1):3-29.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947
Filep, Crystal V. et al. 2018. “Advancing Rigour in Solicited Diary Research.” Qualitative Research 18(4):451-470.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117728411
Finlay, Linda. 2002. “‘Outing’ the Researcher: The Provenance, Process and Practice of Reflexivity.” Qualitative Health Research 12:531-545.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
Fitt, Helen. 2018. “Researching Mobile Practices: Participant Reflection and Audio-Recording in Repeat Question Diaries.” Qualitative Research 18(6):654-670.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117743462
Gershuny, Jonathan and Oriel Sullivan. 1998. “The Sociological Uses of Time-Use Diary Analysis.” European Sociological Review 14(1):69-85.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018228
Gillies, Val and Pam Alldred. 2012. “The Ethics of Intention: Research as a Political Tool.” Pp. 43-60 in Ethics in Qualitative Research. 2nd Edition, edited by T. Miller et al. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913912.n4
Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of the Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Hanna, Esmée. 2018. “The Emotional Labour of Researching Sensitive Topics Online: Considerations and Implications.” Qualitative Research 19(5):524-539.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118781735
Harvey, Laura. 2011. “Intimate Reflections: Private Diaries in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 11(6):664-682.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111415959
Hislop, Jenny et al. 2005. “Narratives of the Night: The Use of Audio Diaries in Researching Sleep.” Sociological Research Online 10(4):13-25.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1194
Hyers, Lauri L. 2018. Diary Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190256692.001.0001
Johnson, Julia and Bill Bytheway. 2001. “An Evaluation of the Use of Daries in a Study of Medication in Later Life.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4(3):183-204.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570010029467
Karadzhov, Dimitar. 2020. “Expanding the Methodological Repertoire of Participatory Research into Homelessness: The Utility of the Mobile Phone Diary.” Qualitative Social Work 20(3). Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1473325020913904
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020913904
Latham, Alan. 2003. “Research, Performance, and Doing Human Geography: Some Reflections on the Diary-Photograph, Diary-Interview Method.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 35(11):1993-2017.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a3587
Luka, Mary E. and Mélanie Millette. 2018. “(Re)Framing Big Data: Activating Situated Knowledges and a Feminist Ethics of Care in Social Media Research.” Social Media + Society 4(2). Retrieved July 07, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056305118768297
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768297
Lynch, Michael. 2000. “Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge.” Theory, Culture & Society 17(3):26-54.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202
Markham, Annette N. 2019. “Critical Pedagogy as a Response to Datafication.” Qualitative Inquiry 25(8):754-760.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809470
Markham, Annette N. 2020. “Taking Data Literacy to the Streets: Critical Pedagogy in the Public Sphere.” Qualitative Inquiry 26(2):227-237.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419859024
Markham, Annette N. and Gabriel Pereira. 2019. “Analyzing Public Interventions through the Lens of Experimentalism: The Case of the Museum of Random Memory.” Digital Creativity 30(4):235-256.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2019.1688838
Mauthner, Natasha S. and Andrea Doucet. 2003. “Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis.” Sociology 37(3):413-431.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002
McCoyd, Judith et al. 2022. “‘There Is Just a Different Energy’: Changes in the Therapeutic Relationship with the Telehealth Transition.” Clinical Social Work Journal 50(3):325-336.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-022-00844-0
Meth, Paula. 2003. “Using Diaries to Understand Women’s Responses to Crime and Violence.” Environment and Urbanization 16(2):153-164.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600207
Miller, Tina et al., eds. 2012. Ethics in Qualitative Research. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Milligan, Christine. 2005. “Placing Narrative Correspondence in the Geographer’s Toolbox: Insights from Care Research in New Zealand.” New Zealand Geographer 61:213-224.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2005.00035.x
Monrouxe, Lynn V. 2009. “Solicited Audio Diaries in Longitudinal Narrative Research: A View from Inside.” Qualitative Research 9(1):81-103.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098032
Moretti, Veronica. 2021. “Dear (Digital) Diary: Evaluating the Audio Diary Technique as a Research Method.” Pp. 375-389 in Handbook of Research on Advanced Research Methodologies for a Digital Society, edited by G. Punziano and A. Delli Paoli. Hershey, New York, Beijing: IGI Global.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8473-6.ch023
Mueller, Grace et al. 2023. “Disaster Diaries: Qualitative Research at a Distance.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22. Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/16094069221147163
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221147163
Neale, Bren. 2021. “Fluid Enquiry, Complex Causality, Policy Processes: Making a Difference with Qualitative Longitudinal Research.” Social Policy and Society 20(4):653-669.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000142
O’Reilly, Kathleen et al. 2022. “Audio Diaries: A Novel Method for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene-Related Maternal Stress Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21. Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/16094069211073222?icid=int.sj-full-text.similar-articles.7
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211073222
Rees, Charlotte E., Paul Crampton, and Lynn Monrouxe. 2020. “Re-Visioning Academic Medicine through a Constructionist Lens.” Academic Medicine 95(6):846-850.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003109
Rudrum, Sarah et al. 2022. “Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/16094069221093138
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221093138
Schurr, Carolin and Katharina Abdo. 2016. “Rethinking the Place of Emotions in the Field through Social Laboratories.” Gender, Place & Culture 23(1):120-133.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.970138
Scott, Stephanie. 2022. “‘I Enjoy Having Someone to Rant to, I Feel Like Someone is Listening to Me’: Exploring Emotion in the Use of Qualitative, Longitudinal Diary-Based Methods.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21. Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/16094069221074444
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221074444
Seide, Kapriskie et al. 2023. “Piloting a Flexible Solicited Diary Study with Marginalized Latina Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/16094069231183119
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183119
Shklarski, Liat, Allison Abrams, and Elana Bakst. 2021. “Navigating Changes in the Physical and Psychological Spaces of Psychotherapists during Covid-19: When Home Becomes the Office.” Practice Innovations 6(1):55-66.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000138
Smyth, Joshua M. 1998. “Written Emotional Expression: Effect Sizes, Outcome Types and Moderating Variables.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66:174-184.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.66.1.174
Sorokin, Pitirim A. and Clarence Q. Berger. 1939. Time-Budgets of Human Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Watson, Ash and Deborah Lupton. 2022. “Remote Fieldwork in Homes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Video-Call Ethnography and Map Drawing Methods.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21. Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/16094069221078376
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221078376
Watson, Ash, Deborah Lupton, and Mike Michael. 2021. “The COVID Digital Home Assemblage: Transforming the Home into a Work Space during the Crisis.” Convergence 27(5):1207- 1222.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211030848
Woolgar, Steve, ed. 1988. Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Worth, Nancy. 2009. “Making Use of Audio Diaries in Research with Young People: Examining Narrative, Participation and
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1967
Audience.” Sociological Research Online 14(4). Retrieved July 08, 2025 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.5153/sro.1967
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. and D. Lawrence Wieder. 1977. “The Diary Diary-Interview Method.” Urban Life 5(4):479-498.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124167700500406
Znaniecki, Florian. 1934. The Method of Sociology. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

