A Qualitative Analysis of Parenting and Social Capital: Comparing the Work of Coleman and Bourdieu

Val Gillies; Rosalind Edwards

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.2.2.04

Authors

Val Gillies London South Bank University, England
Rosalind Edwards London South Bank University, England

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.2.2.04

Keywords:

parenting, social capital, family, Coleman, Bourdieu

Abstract

This paper will present an empirically based analysis of parenting in order to critically examine the work of two major social capital theorists. The work of James S. Coleman and Pierre Bourdieu is much cited, but while both focus on the links between individuals, families and wider social structures, their theories are based on very different interpretations of social capital and its implications. Drawing on qualitative data from a UK based qualitative study of parenting resources this paper will critically assess each theory using case studies. We argue that these two approaches allude to different social resources, with Coleman’s work representing the tightly bonded solidarities more often found among working class communities, while Bourdieu focuses on the more diffuse, instrumental networking most associated with the middle classes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Val Gillies, London South Bank University, England

Val Gillies is a Senior Research Fellow in the Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group at London South Bank University. She has researched and published widely in the area of family and social class. Her most recent publications include Marginalised Mothers: Exploring Working Class Parenting, along with various journal articles and book chapters on parenting and social policy, young people’s family lives and qualitative research methods.
Rosalind Edwards, London South Bank University, England

Rosalind Edwards is Professor in Social Policy and Director of the Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group at London South Bank University (www.lsbu.ac.uk/families). Her research interests mainly focus on family policy and family life, especially in relation to gender, class and ethnicity, on which she has published widely. She also has an interest in methodology as founding and co-editor of the International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice.

References

Allatt, Pat (1993) „Becoming privileged: the role of family processes.” Pp.139-59 in Youth and Inequality, edited by Inge Bates and George Risebourough. Buckingham: Open University.

Amato, Paul (1998) „More than money? Men’s contribution to their children’s lives.” Pp. 248-258 in Men in Families: When Do They Get Involved? What Difference Does it Make? edited by Alan Booth and Ann Creuter. Lawrence Erlbaum: New Jersey.

Bagnell, Gaynor, Brian Longhurst and Mike Savage (2003) “Children, belonging and social capital: the PTA and middle class narratives of social involvement in the North-West of England.” Sociological Research Online 8 (4). Retrieved June 20, 2006 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/4/bagnall.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.862

Ball, Stephen.J., Richard Bowe and Sharon Gewirtz (1996) „School choice, social class and distinction: the realization of social advantage in education.” Journal of Education Policy 11:89-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093960110105

Bates, Inge (2002) “Resisting Parental Endeavours: Exploring the Dynamics of Transmission of Cultural and Social Capital.” Leeds Strand, Working Paper 5, presented to the ESRC Youth, Citizenship and Social Change Programme European Context Workshop, 7-8 March, Brighton.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507

Bourdieu, Pierre (1979) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1990) In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558

Bourdieu, Pierre (1997) “The forms of capital.” Pp.46-58 in Education: Culture, Economy and Society, edited by A.H. Halsey, Hugh Lauder, Phillip Brown and Amy Stuart Wells. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre, Alain Accardo, Gabrielle Balazs, Stephanie Beaud, Francois Bonvin, Emmanuel Bourdieu, Philippe Bourgois, Sylvain Broccolichi, Patrick Champagne, Rosine Christin, Jean-Pierre Faguer, Sandrine Garcia, Remi Lenior, Francoise Oeuvard, Michel Pialoux, Lois Pinto, Denis Podalydes, Abulmalik Sayad, Charles Soulie and Loic Waquant (1999) Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity.

Dika, Sandra and Kusum Singh (2002) “Applications of social capital in educational literature: a critical synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 72(1):31-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072001031

Coleman, James (1988) “Social capital in the creation of human capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94:121-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Coleman, James (1990) The Foundations of Social Theory. London: Harvard University Press.

Coleman, James (1991) “Prologue: constructed social organization.” Pp. 1-14 in Social Theory for a Changing Society, edited by Pierre Bourdieu and James Coleman. Oxford: Westview Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429306440-1

Crozier, Gill (1996) „Empowering the powerful: a discussion of the interrelation of government policies and consumerism with social class factors and the impact of this upon parent interventions in their children’s schooling.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 18:87-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569970180203

Edwards, Rosalind (2004) „Present and absent in troubling ways: families and social capital debates.” The Sociological Review 52(1):1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00439.x

Edwards, Rosalind, Jane Franklin and Janet Holland (2003) „Families and Social Capital: Exploring the Issues.” Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group Working Paper No. 1. London: South Bank University.

Edwards, Rosalind and Val Gillies (2004) „Support in parenting: values and consensus concerning who to turn to.” Journal of Social Policy 33(4):627-647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008037

Everingham, Christine (2003) Justice and the Politics of Community. Hampshire: Ashgate.

Furstenberg, Frank F. and Mary E. Hughes (1995) „Social capital and successful development among at risk youth.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 57: p. 580-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353914

Gewirtz, Sharon (2001) „Cloning the Blairs: New Labour’s programme for the resocialization of working class-parents.” Journal of Education Policy 16(4):365-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110054353

Gillies, Val (2005a) “Raising the meritocracy: parenting and the individualisation of social class.” Sociology 39 (5):835-852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505058368

Gillies, Val (2005b) “Parenting and social capital: accessing help and support from informal social networks.” Sociologija, XLVI (3):245-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC0403245G

Halpern, David (2004) Social Capital, Cambridge: Polity.

Hanafin, Joan and Ann Lynch (2002) „Peripheral voices: parental involvement, social class, and educational disadvantage.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 23(1):35-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690120102845

Lovell, Terry (2000) „Thinking feminism with and against Bourdieu.” Feminist Theory 1(1):11-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14647000022229047

Lawler, Steph (2000) Mothering the Self: Mothers, Daughters, Subjects. London: Routledge.

McNay, Lois (1999 ) „Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity.” Theory, Culture and Society 16(1):95-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327699016001007

Molyneux, Maxine (2002) “Gender and the silences of social capital: lessons from Latin America.” Development and Change 33(2):167-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00246

Moore, Gwen (1990) “Structural determinants of men's and women's personal networks.” American Sociological Review 55: 726-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095868

Portes, Alejandro (1998) „Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24(1):1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1

Putnam, Robert (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Runyan, Desmond K., Wanda Hunter, Rebecca Socolar, Lisa Amaya-Jackson, Diana English, John Landsverk, Howard Dubowitz, Dorothy H. Browne, Shirkant Bangdiwala and Ravi Mathew (1998) “Children who prosper in unfavourable environments: the relations to social capital.” Pediatrics 101(1):12-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.1.12

Sahlins, Marshall (1972, reprinted 2002) Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Seaman, Patrick and Helen Sweeting (2004) „Assisting young people’s access to social capital in contemporary families: a qualitative study.” Journal of Youth Studies 7(2):175-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1367626042000238703

Reay, Diane (1996) “Dealing with difficult differences: reflexivity and social class in feminist research.” Feminism and Psychology 6(3):443-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353596063007

Reay, Diane (1997) “Feminist theory, habitus and social class: disrupting notions of classlessness.” Women’s Studies International Forum 20(2):225-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00003-4

Skeggs, Beverly (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.

Skeggs, Beverly (2004) Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.

Teachmann, Jay, Kathleen Paasch and Karen Carver (1996) “Social capital and dropping out of school early.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:773-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353735

Tomanović, Smiljka (2004) “Family habitus as the cultural context for childhood.” Childhood 1(3):339-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568204044887

Vincent, Carol (1996) Parents and Teachers: Power and Participation. London: Falmer Press.

Williams, Colin and Janice Windebank (2002) “The uneven geographies of informal economic activities; a case study of two British cities.” Work Employment and Society 16(2):231-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095001702400426820