Insights From Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics on Best Practice In Professional Service Firms: On Perpetual Myth Creation?

Katarzyna Kosmala

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.1.1.03

Authors

Katarzyna Kosmala Heriot-Watt University, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.1.1.03

Keywords:

judgement, structure, organisational practice, socialisation, hermeneutics

Abstract

Drawing on the work of Ricoeur, this paper contributes to theorisation of the organisational field in understanding of how structural power operates through professional langue in shaping a construction of individual judgement in professional service firms. As Ricoeur argued that judicial sense may be envisaged as one of the best examples of hermeneutic application (1991: 493), I explore practitioners’ sense making and their interaction with the surrounding structures and its discourse, learned and assimilated during the formative years in the context of audit practice. The interviews-based story provides an illustration of (1) the processes of socialisation that are geared towards conceptions of what constitutes professional best practice, where the professional learns to use judgement and follow structure in particular ways (a perpetuated myth of best practice), and (2) the effects of such formation on the working process. The paper contributes insights into organisational theory in areas of negotiating a balance between institutional requirements (structural conditioning of professional epistemology) and technical demands of hermeneutic function (purposive expert activities) in decision making process. The paper concludes that practitioners assume the appearance of professionalism by adopting a particular professional langue where judgement becomes normative in its own terms. These re-production processes in accordance with organisational frames of references for action may be in opposition to the decisional autonomy, where there may be a space for simultaneously creating (agency) and sharing (structure) on the job. The study reveals that professional langue itself is a place of prejudice and bias on the job.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Katarzyna Kosmala, Heriot-Watt University, UK

Katarzyna Kosmala (Ph.D) is a lecturer at School of Management and Languages, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh. Her research interests encompass critical and interpretative approaches in analyzing professionalization processes, construction of professional identity and competence (socialization, ways of learning and working in professional firms); critical organizational theory; issues of identity and contemporary culture, including visual culture; art, ethics and aesthetics and organizational interface; professions under transition in the socio-economic and cultural context of emerging democracies.

References

Abbot, Andrew (1988) The System of Professions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Anderson Gough, Fiona, Christopher Grey and Keith Robson (2000) “In the Name of the Client: The Service Ethic in Two International Accounting Firms.” Human Relations 53(9): 1151-1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539003

Anderson Gough, Fiona, Christopher Grey and Keith Robson (2001) “Test of Time: Organizational Time-Reckoning and the Making of Accountants in Two Multi-National Accounting Firms.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 26: 99-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00019-2

Anderson Gough, Fiona, Christopher Grey and Keith Robson (2002) “Accounting Professionals and the Accounting Profession: Linking Conduct and Context.” Accounting and Business Research 32(1): 41-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2002.9728953

Arrington, Edward and Jere Francis (1993) “Giving Economic Accounts: Accounting as Cultural Practice.” Accounting, Organisations and Society 18(2/3):107-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90029-6

Boland, Richard (1989) “Beyond the Objectivist and the Subjectivist: Learning to Read Accounting as Text.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 8(2/3): 591-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(89)90021-4

Bowrin, Anthony (1998) “Review and Synthesis of Audit Structure Literature.” Journal of Accounting Literature 17: 40-71.

Calvino, Italo (1986) The Uses of Literature. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Covaleski, Mark, Mark Dirsmith, James Heian and Sajay Samuel (1998) “The Calculated and the Avowed: Techniques of Discipline and Struggles over Identity in Big Six Public Accounting Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 293-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393854

Dingwall, Robert (1983) The Sociology of the Professions. London: Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16979-5

Dirsmith, Mark, James Heian and Mark Covaleski (1997) “Structure and Agency in Institutionalised Setting: The Application and Social Transformation of Control in the Big Six.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 22(1): 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00005-0

Fincham, Robin (1992) “Perspectives on Power: Processual, Institutional and Internal Forms of Organisational Power.” Journal of Management Studies 29(6): 741-759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00687.x

Fontana, Andrea and James Frey (1994) “Interviewing: The Art of Science.” Pp. 361 - 376 in Handbook of Qualitative Research edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Francis, Jere (1994) “Auditing, Hermeneutics and Subjectivity.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 19(4/5): 235-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90034-5

Giddens, Anthony (1976) New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretive Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.

Grey, Christopher (1998) “On Being a Professional in a ‘Big Six’ Firm.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(5/6): 569-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00003-2

Jervolino, Domenico (1996) “Gadamer and Ricoeur on the Hermeneutics of Praxis.” Pp. 63 – 79 in Paul Ricoeur: The Hermeneutics of Action, edited by R. Kearney. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446278932.n6

Kinney, William (1986) “Audit Technology and Preferences for Auditing Standards.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 8(1): 73-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(86)90011-X

Kosmala MacLullich, Katarzyna (2003) “The Emperor’s ‘New’ Clothes? New Audit Regimes: Insights from Foucault’s Technologies of the Self.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14 (8): 791-811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00206-X

Lavoie, David (1987) “The Accounting of Interpretations and the Interpretation of Accounts: The Communicative Function of the Language of Business.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(6): 579-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90010-9

Leeuwen, Theodoor Marius van (1981) The Surplus of Meaning: Ontology and Eschatology in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Llewellyn, Sue (1993) “Working in Hermeneutic Circles in Management Accounting Research: Some Implications and Applications.” Management Accounting Research 4: 231-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1993.1013

Madison, Gary (1990) The Hermeneutics of Postmodernity: Figures and Themes. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Mills, Jeffrey and Steven Bettner (1992) “Ritual and Conflict in the Audit Profession.” Critical Perspectives in Accounting 3(2): 185-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1045-2354(92)90010-O

Pentland, Brian (2000) “Will Auditors Take Over the World? Program, Technique and the Verification of Everything.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 25: 307-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)90047-8

Ramsay, Richard (1994) “An Investigation of the Hierarchical Nature of Audit Work Paper Review.” Journal of Accounting Research 32: 127-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2491391

Ricoeur, Paul (1965) History and Truth. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Ricoeur, Paul (1974) The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Ricoeur, Paul (1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Translated& edited by J. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984

Ricoeur, Paul (1991) Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination. edited by M. Valdes. University of Toronto Press.

Ricoeur, Paul (1991a) From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics II. Translated by K. Blamey and J. Thompson. London: The Athlone Press.

Roberts, Jennifer and Robert Scapens (1993) “Accounting and Control: A Case Study of Resistance to Accounting Change.” Management Accounting Research 4: 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1993.1001

Shrivastava, Paul and Susan Schneider (1984) “Organisational Frames of References.” Human Relations 37(10): 795-809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403701002

Thompson, John (1981) Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609176

Willmott, Hugh (1993) “Paradigms of Accounting Research: Critical Reflections on Tomkins and Groves: Everyday Accountant and Researching His Reality.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 18(4): 389-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(83)90052-1