The Memoir Method in Educational Research From an Australian Perspective

Authors

  • Vegneskumar Maniam University of New England, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.3.02

Keywords:

Humanistic Sociology, Memoir Method, Cultural Identity, Ethnic, Australian Perspective

Abstract

This paper reviews some key memoir studies, which were carried out in South Australia, and considers their process of data collection and analysis. A second aim is to explore the current status and usefulness of Znaniecki’s memoir approach in contemporary educational research. Smolicz followed Znaniecki in emphasizing the need to accept social and cultural values and actions as facts, just as human agents themselves accept them. Every individual was seen as a member of various group social systems and interpreted as a center of experience and actions based on the cultures of those groups. Smolicz also adopted Znaniecki’s memoir method of collecting and analyzing personal data in order to understand the actions and attitudes of young people of immigrant families and their educational experiences in Australian schools. These conscious human agents played an important role in maintaining and changing their group’s cultural systems. This paper highlights examples of various forms of memoirs collected from four different studies focused specifically on the issue of cultural identity. The comments of the participants, who came from various minority ethnic groups living in Australia, illustrate the nature of the comments made, as well as the researchers’ analysis and findings. The research studies of Smolicz and his associates demonstrate that memoir method has an important place in understanding the culture of different groups, which can be applied in many contexts – global, ethnic, national, and local.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Vegneskumar Maniam, University of New England, Australia

    Vegneskumar Maniam, PhD., is an academic in education at the University of New England, Australia. His primary research focus is on Sociology of Education and Sports participation, especially in relation to issues of multiculturalism and sense of identity.

References

Blumer, Herbert. 1939. Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences I: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s “The Polish Peasant in Europe and America.” New York: Social Science Research Council.

Chałasiński, Józef. 1938. Młode pokolenie chłopów (vol. I-IV). Warsaw: Ludowa Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza.

Chałasiński, Józef. 1982. “Autobiographies as Data for Sociological Analyses.” Sisyphus: Sociological Studies 2:33-49.

Chałasiński, Józef. 1984. “Chłopi i panowie. Inteligencja a problem chłopski w kulturze polskiej.” Kultura i Społeczenstwo 28(4):5-34.

Chiro, Giancarlo. 1998. The Activation and Evaluation of Italian Language and Culture in a Group of Tertiary Students of Italian Ancestry in Australia. PhD dissertation, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Clyne, Michael. 2005. Australia’s Language Potential. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

Hałas, Elżbieta, (ed.). 2000. Florian Znaniecki’s Sociological Theory and the Challenges of 21st Century. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Hałas, Elżbieta. 2006. “Classical Cultural Sociology: Florian Znaniecki’s Impact in a New Light.” Journal of Classical Sociology 6(3):257-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X06069678

Hałas, Elżbieta, (ed.). 2010. “Towards the World Culture Society: Florien Znaniecki’s Culturalism.” Studies in Sociology: Symbols, Theory and Society (vol. 6). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-00141-9

Jupp, James. 1996. Understanding Australian Multiculturalism. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Kłoskowska, Antonina. 2001. National Cultures at the Grass-Root Level. Budapest, New York: Central European University Press.

Krawczyk, Zbigniew. 1970. “Florian Znaniecki’s Humanistic Approach to Physical Culture.” International Review for The Sociology of Sport 5:131-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/101269027000500107

Krawczyk, Zbigniew. 1980. “Sport and Culture.” International Review for The Sociology of Sport 15:7-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/101269028001500302

Maadad, Nina. 2009. Adaptation of Arab Immigrants to Australia. Adelaide: Shannon Research Press.

Maniam, Vegneskumar. 2011. Adelaide Secondary School Students’ Participation in Sport and Their Cultural Identity: A Humanistic Sociological Study. PhD dissertation, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Maniam, Vegneskumar. 2012. “J.J. Smolicz and His Multicultural Legacy in Australia.” The International Journal of The Humanities 9(11):135-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v09i11/43102

Maniam, Vegneskumar and Robert Matthews. 2012. “Secondary School Students’ Feelings About Participation in Sports: A Qualitative Study From Six Schools in Adelaide, South Australia.” The International Journal of Sport and Society 2(4):61-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v02i04/53884

Marjoribanks, Kevin. 2002. Family and School Capital: Towards a Context Theory of Students’ School Outcomes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9980-1

Secombe, Margaret. 1997. “Cultural Interaction in the Experience of Some ‘Mainstream’ Australian Graduates of Anglo- Celtic Cultural Background: A Humanistic Sociological Study.” PhD dissertation, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Secombe, Margaret. 2013. “Creating a Tradition of Research in Education: The Majoribanks and Smolicz Achievement.” Pp. 3-18 in Excellence in Scholarship: Transcending Trandisciplinarity in Teacher Education, edited by S. Alagumalai, S. Burley, J. Keeves. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-257-0_1

Secombe, Margaret and Joseph Zajda (eds.). 1999. J.J. Smolicz on Education and Culture. Melbourne: James Nicholas Publishers.

Smolicz, Jerzy J. 1979. Culture and Education in a Plural Society. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.

Smolicz, Jerzy J. 1994. Australian diversity. 2nd ed. Adelaide: Centre for Intercultural Studies and Multicultural Education, University of Adelaide.

Smolicz, Jerzy J. 2002. “Native Tongues and Family Structures as Symbols of Ethnic Identity: An Australian Experience.” Pp. 101-126 in Studies in Sociology: Symbols, Power and Politics (vol. 1), edited by E. Hałas. Frankfurt an Main: Peter Lang.

Smolicz, Jerzy J. and Margaret Secombe. 1981. The Australian School Through Children’s Eyes. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Smolicz, Jerzy J. and Margaret Secombe. 2000. “Znaniecki’s Memoir Methodology and Changing Attitudes to Cultural Pluralism Among Anglo-Australian University Students.” Pp. 269-286 in Florian Znaniecki’s Sociological Theory and the Challenges of 21st Century, edited by E. Hałas. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Smolicz, Jerzy J. et al. 2010. “Religious Belief and Moral Values Among Some University Students in Post-Communist Poland.” Pp. 239-254 in Religion and Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by G. Pusztai. Debrecen: Center for Higher Education Research and Development.

Thomas, Willam I. and Florian Znaniecki. 1927. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Znaniecki, Florian. 1945. “Controversies in Doctrine and Method.” The American Journal of Sociology 50(6):514-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/219692

Znaniecki, Florian. 1963. Cultural Science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Znaniecki, Florian. 1968. The Method of Sociology. New York: Octagon Press.

Znaniecki, Florian. 1969. Florian Znaniecki on Humanistic Sociology. Edited by Robert Bierstedt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Maniam, Vegneskumar. 2014. “The Memoir Method in Educational Research From an Australian Perspective”. Qualitative Sociology Review 10 (3): 48-59. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.3.02.