Technology and Making-Meaning in College Relationships: Understanding Hyper-Connection

Alecea Standlee

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.01

Authors

Alecea Standlee Concord University, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.12.2.01

Keywords:

Social Interaction, Presence, Absence, Relationships, College Students, Connection, Disconnection, Intimacy, Communication Technology

Abstract

This article explores how the use of communication technology has transformed social interactions and the sense of self that is derived from such interactions by considering the role of presence and absence in relationships among college students. Analyzing interviews with 38 participants, I explore how they construct understandings of presence, absence, connection, and disconnection within peer social groups and intimate relationships, indicating the emergence of a culture of hyper-connection. I suggest that technological developments have enabled forms of interaction that encourage frequent connection and the idealization of constant communication among participants. These findings further indicate that the normalization of hyper-connection may have impacts on relationship practices and constructions of identity among participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alecea Standlee, Concord University, U.S.A.

Alecea Standlee is an Assistant Professor and Sociologist at Concord University. She studies the role of techno-mediated communication in the lives of teens and young adults, with a specific focus on interpersonal relationships. Her work focuses on the persistence of relationships mediated by both technological and traditional communication styles, and utilizes symbolic interactionism and post-structural thinking.

References

Bai, Ya-Mei, Chao-Cheng Lin, and Jen-Yeu Chen. 2001. “Internet Addiction Disorder Among Clients of a Virtual Clinic.” Psychiatric Services 52(10):1397-1397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.10.1397

Bellotti, Elisa. 2008. “What Are Friends For? Elective Communities of Single People.” Social Networks 30(4): 318-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.001

Birkets, Sven. 1994. “The Electronic Hive: Two Views. Refuse It.” Harpers Magazine, May.

Booth, Frances. 2013. The Distraction Trap: How to Focus in a Digital World. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Castells, Manuel. 2005. “The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy.” Pp. 3-22 in The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy, edited by M. Castells and G. Cardoso. Washington: Center for Transatlantic Relations.

Engelberg, Elisabeth and Lennart Sjöberg. 2004. “Internet Use, Social Skills, and Adjustment.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 7(1):41-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104322820101

Gergen, Kenneth. 2000. The Saturated Self: Dilemmas Of Identity In Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Gubrium, Jaber F. and James A. Holstein. 2000. “The Self in a World of Going Concerns.” Symbolic Interaction 23(2):95-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2000.23.2.95

Hur, Mann Hyung. 2006. “Demographic, Habitual, and Socioeconomic Determinants of Internet Addiction Disorder: An Empirical Study of Korean Teenagers.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 9(5):514-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.514

Kraut, Robert et al. 1998. “Internet Paradox: A Social Technology That Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?” American Psychologist 53(9):1017-1031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017

McKenna, Katelyn, Amie Green, and Marci Gleason. 2002. “Relationship Formation on the Internet: What’s the Big Attraction?” Journal of Social Issues 58(1):9-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246

McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McLuhan, Marshall and Quentin Fiore. 2001. The Medium Is the Massage. Corte Madera: Gingko Press.

Palfrey, John G. and Urs Gasser. 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books.

Putnam, Robert. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Quan-Haase, Anabel and Barry Wellman. 2005. “Hyperconnected Net Work: Computer Mediated Community in a High- Tech Organization.” Pp. 281-334 in The Corporation as a Collaborative Community: The Reconstruction of Trust in the Knowledge Economy, edited by Ch. Heckscher and P. S. Adler. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Reid, Donna and Fraser Reid. 2004. “Insights Into the Social and Psychological Effects of SMS Text Messaging.” Retrieved July 23, 2013 http://courses.educ.ubc.ca/etec540/May08/suz/assests/SocialEffectsOfTextMessaging.pdf

Sanders, Christopher E. et al. 2000. “The Relationship of Internet Use to Depression and Social Isolation Among Adolescents.” Adolescence 35(138):237-242.

Siomos, Konstantinos and Nikiforos Angelopoulos. 2008. “Internet Addiction Disorder.” Psychiatrike 19(1):52-58.

Taylor, Steven J. and Robert Bogdan. 1998. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. New York: Wiley.

Wellman, Barry. 2001. “Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2):227-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00309

Young, Kimberly S. 1998. “Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 1(3):237-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237

Zhao, Shanyang. 2003. “Toward a Taxonomy of Copresence.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12(5):445-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761261