Social Constructionism Turned Into Human Service Work

Margaretha Järvinen; Gale Miller

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.13

Authors

Margaretha Järvinen University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Gale Miller Marquette University, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.2.13

Keywords:

Applied Constructionism, Constructionist Activism, Statements/Counterstatements, Narrative Therapy, Oppressive vs. Liberating Stories, Expert Knowledge

Abstract

Studies of applied constructionism are opportunities for scholars to explore how social constructionism is a resource used by claims-makers in describing and justifying their orientations to professional practice. The present paper expands sociological constructionism by analyzing applied constructionism in social problems work in Copenhagen, Denmark. Based on interviews with staff members in narrative drug treatment, we explore two themes: the relationship between dominant and liberating narratives and the position of expert knowledge in narrative therapy. Our guiding framework is Ian Hacking’s inquiry into the Social Construction of What? and Kenneth Burke’s dialogic approach of comparing statements to counterstatements. The purpose of the paper is to link academic studies of the social construction of realities to applied constructionists’ principles in addressing social problems. We do this by describing narrative therapists’ critical reflections on their own work, suggesting that these reflections are not only useful when it comes to developing narrative therapy but also for the advancement of academic constructionism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Margaretha Järvinen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Margaretha Järvinen is a Professor at the Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Her research areas include: alcohol and drug research, symbolic interactionism, qualitative methods, meetings between clients and the social welfare system, youth studies. Among her latest publications are: Turning Troubles Into Problems. Clientization in Human Services (edited with J. F. Gubrium [2013]), “Cannabis Careers Revisited. Applying Howard S. Becker’s Theory to Present-Day Cannabis Use” (with S. Ravn [2013]), and “Selections of Reality: Applying Burke’s Dramatism to a Harm Reduction Program” (with G. Miller [2014]).
Gale Miller, Marquette University, U.S.A.

Gale Miller is a Professor Emeritus of Sociology, Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University. He has longstanding research interests in the sociology of troubles and social problems, social theory, and institutions. His research has focused on how troubles and problems are defined in human service institutions, such as work to welfare programs and solution-focused brief therapy. His current research deals with individuals and families coping with such enduring crises as having a family member imprisoned for sex offenses in the United States, as well as solution-focused brief therapy.

References

Afuape, Taiwo. 2011. Power, Resistance, and Liberation in Therapy With Survivors of Trauma: To Have Our Hearts Broken. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806401

Besley, Tina. 2001. “Foucauldian Influences in Narrative Therapy: An Approach for Schools.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 2:72-93.

Bruner, Jerome. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019

Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340664

Burke, Kenneth. 1968. Counter-Statement. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Burke, Kenneth. 1969a. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520341715

Burke, Kenneth. 1969b. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Flaskas, Carmen. 2002. Family Therapy Beyond Postmodernism: Practice Challenges Theory. New York: Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360699

Foucault, Michel. 1972. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, edited by C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.

Freedman, Jill and Gene Combs. 1996. Narrative Therapy: The Social Construction of Preferred Realities. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hall, Christopher. 1997. Social Work as Narrative: Storytelling and Persuasion in Professional Texts. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

Järvinen, Margaretha and Gale Miller. 2014. “Selections of Reality: Applying Burke’s Dramatism to a Harm Reduction Program.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25(5):879-887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.02.014

Lock, Andy and Tom Strong, (eds.). 2012. Discursive Perspectives in the Therapeutic Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199592753.001.0001

Mattingly, Cheryl and Maureen Hayes Fleming. 1994. Clinical Reasoning: Forms of Inquiry in a Therapeutic Practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

Miller, Gale and Katherine Fox. 1999. “Learning From Sociological Practice: The Case of Applied Constructionism.” The American Sociologist 30:55-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-999-1004-8

O’Leary, Patrick. 1998. “Liberation From Self-Blame: Work With Men Who Have Experienced Childhood Sexual Abuse.” Dulwich Centre Journal 4:24-40.

Parry, Alan and Robert E. Doan. 1994. Story Re-Visions: Narrative Therapy in the Postmodern World. New York: The Guilford Press.

Parton, Nigel and Patrick O’Byrne. 2000. Constructive Social Work: Towards a New Practice. London: Macmillan Press.

Rosen, Lynne V. and Charley Lang. 2005. “Narrative Therapy With Couples: Promoting Liberation From Constraining Influences.” Pp. 157-178 in Handbook of Couples Therapy, edited by M. Harway. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.

Shanahan, Elizabeth, Michael D. Jones, and Mark K. McBeth. 2011. “Policy Narratives and Policy Processes.” The Policy Studies Journal 39:535-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x

Skovlund, Henrik. 2011. “Overcoming Problems of Relativism in Postmodern Psychotherapy.” Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 41(3):187-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-010-9166-9

Stacey, Ralph, Douglas Griffin, and Patricia Shaw. 2000. Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? London: Routledge.

Strong, Tom. 2012. “Conversation and Its Therapeutic Possibilities.” Pp. 308-322 in Discursive Perspectives in Therapeutic Practice, edited by A. Lock and T. Strong. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199592753.003.0017

Strong, Tom and Andy Lock. 2005. “Discursive Therapy?” Janus Head 8:585-593.

Throgmorton, James A. 1996. Planning as Persuasive Storytelling: The Rhetorical Construction of Chicago’s Electric Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wallis, Jennifer, Jan Burns, and Rose Capdevila. 2011. “What Is Narrative Therapy and What Is It Not? The Usefulness of Q Methodology to Explore Accounts of White and Epston’s (1990) Approach to Narrative Therapy.” Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 18:486-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.723

White, Michael. 1995. Re-Authoring Lives: Interviews and Essays. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.

White, Michael and David Epston. 1990. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980a. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980b. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, edited by G. H. von Wright and C. G. Luckhart. Oxford: Blackwell.