From Total Institution to Status Bloodbath: Goff man as a Comparative Researcher and Grounded Theorist

W. Peter Archibald; Benjamin Kelly; Michael Adorjan

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.11.4.02

Authors

W. Peter Archibald McMaster University, Canada
Benjamin Kelly Nipissing University, Canada
Michael Adorjan University of Calgary, Canada; Fellow, Centre for Criminology, University of Hong Kong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.4.02

Keywords:

Goffman, Sociology, Comparative Methods, Grounded Theory, General Theory

Abstract

Erving Goff man has not only had a huge impact upon his home discipline of sociology but may be its most cited, as well as best known member ever. Nevertheless, Goff man continues to be heavily criticized by his fellow sociologists for his allegedly undecipherable and sloppy methods for conducting empirical research and constructing and accumulating general theory. We demonstrate here that while some of his specific practices were intuitive and unorthodox, and perhaps not always available to Goff man himself through self-reflection, they often included systematic empirical comparisons and generalizations, and grounded, general theory. It is tragic that he apparently died lamenting that these common characteristics of his work have been so little recognized (Berger 1986). He encouraged Verhoeven (1993), among others, to rectify this, and hopefully our own eff orts here have contributed to this important, but unfinished business.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

W. Peter Archibald, McMaster University, Canada

Peter Archibald has a PhD in Social Psychology from the University of Michigan, U.S.A. He has writt en and taught about the relationships among the social sciences, “human nature,” industrial relations, and the social and personal impact of economic crises. He is currently Professor Emeritus at McMaster University.
Benjamin Kelly, Nipissing University, Canada

Benjamin Kelly is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at Nipissing University, Canada. His theoretical and qualitative research interests include investigating the relationship between identity, emotions, and social structure.
Michael Adorjan, University of Calgary, Canada; Fellow, Centre for Criminology, University of Hong Kong

Michael Adorjan is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Calgary, Canada and Honorary Fellow in the Centre for Criminology, University of Hong Kong. His research and teaching focus on youth crime representations and responses, fear of crime, trust in police, and cyber-risk.

References

Adler, Patricia A. and Peter Adler. 1998. “Observational Techniques.” Pp. 79-109 in Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. L. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Becker, Howard S. 2003. “The Politics of Presentation: Goff man and Total Institutions.” Symbolic Interaction 26:659-669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.659

Benford, Robert D. and David A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:611-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611

Berger, Bennett M. 1986. “Forward.” Pp. xi-xvii in Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University.

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Branaman, Ann. 1997. “Goff man’s Social Theory.” Pp. xlv-lxxxii in The Goff man Reader, edited by C. Lemert and A. Branaman. Oxford: Blackwell.

Brown, Jonathon. 1998. The Self. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Burns, Tom. 1992. Erving Goffman. London: Routledge.

Cahill, Spencer, Gary A. Fine, and Linda Grant. 1995. “Dimensions of Qualitative Research.” Pp. 606-629 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, and J. S. House. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Charmaz, Kathy. 1998. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructionist Methods.” Pp. 249-291 in Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. L. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Davis, Murray S. 1997. “Georg Simmel and Erving Goffman: Legitimators of the Sociological Investigation of Human Experience.” Qualitative Sociology 20(3):369-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024779300122

Denzin, Norman K. 1978. The Research Act, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Denzin, Norman K. 1989. Interpretative Interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Building Theories From Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14(4):532-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Ellison, Nicole, Rebecca Heino, and Jennifer Gibbs. 2006. “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 11:415-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Goffman, Erving. 1961a. Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Goffman, Erving. 1961b. Encounters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Goffman, Erving. 1963a. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.

Goffman, Erving. 1963b. Stigma. Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice- Hall.

Goffman, Erving. 1969. Strategic Interaction. New York: Ballantine.

Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public. New York: Harper and Row.

Goffman, Erving. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48(2):1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141

Goffman, Erving. 1986 [1974]. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University.

Goffman, Erving. 1989 [1974]. “On Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18(2):123-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124189018002001

Gouldner, Alvin. 1971. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Equinox.

Huber, Joan. 1973. “Symbolic Interaction as a Pragmatic Perspective: The Bias of Emergent Theory.” American Sociological Review 38:274-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094400

Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Logic of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler.

Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Link, Bruce G. and Jo C. Phelan. 2001. “Conceptualizing Stigma.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:363-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363

Lofland, John. 1980. “Early Goffman: Style, Structure, Substance, Soul.” Pp. 24-50 in The View From Goffman, edited by J. Ditton. New York: St. Martin’s. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16268-0_2

Lofland, John. 1984. “Erving Goffman ’s Sociological Legacies.” Urban Life 13(1):7-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0098303984013001002

Manning, Philip. 1992. Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. Stanford: Stanford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2075701

McAdam, Doug, John McCarthy, and Mayer Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives On Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803987

Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mead, George H. 1964 [1922]. “Cooley’s Contribution to American Social Thought.” Pp. xxi-xxxviii in Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Schocken Books.

Meeker, Barbara F. and Robert K. Leik. 1995. “Experimentation in Sociological Social Psychology.” Pp. 630-649 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, and J. S. House. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Misztal, Barbara A. 2001. “Normality and Trust in Goff man’s Theory of Interaction Order.” Sociological Theory 19(3):312-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00143

Park, Robert E. 1952. Human Communities: The City and Human Ecology. Collected Papers, vol. II. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Parsons, Talcott. 1968. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.

Peele, Roger et al. 2000. “Asylums Revisited.” Pp. 184-192 in Erving Goff man, vol. IV, edited by G. A. Fine and G. W. H. Smith. London: Sage.

Quirk, Alan, Paul Lelliott , and Clive Seale. 2006. “The Permeable Institution: An Ethnographic Study of Three Acute Psychiatric Wards in London.” Social Science and Medicine 63:2105-2117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.021

Richard, Michel P. 1986. “Goffman Revisited: Relatives vs. Administrators in Nursing Homes.” Qualitative Sociology 9(4):321-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988462

Roethlisberger, F. J. and William Dickson. 1964. Management and the Worker. New York: Wiley.

Scheff , Thomas J. 2006. Goff man Unbound!: A New Paradigm for Social Science. Boulder: Paradigm.

Silverman, David. 1989a. “The Impossible Dreams of Reformism and Romanticism.” Pp. 32-48 in The Politics of Field Research, edited by J. F. Gubrium and D. Silverman. London: Sage.

Silverman, David. 1989b. “Six Rules of Qualitative Research: A Post-Romantic Argument.” Symbolic Interaction 12(2):215-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1989.12.2.215

Silverman, David. 1989c. “Telling Convincing Stories: A Plea for Cautious Positivism in Case Studies.” Pp. 57-77 in The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences, edited by B. Glassner and J. D. Moreno. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3444-8_5

Silverman, David. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. London: Sage.

Smith, Greg. 2006. Erving Goffman. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203002346

Thomas, William I. 1923. The Unadjusted Girl. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Tittle, Charles R. 1972a. “Institutional Living and Rehabilitation.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 13(3):263-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136763

Tittle, Charles R. 1972b. “Institutional Living and Self-Esteem.” Social Problems 20(1):65-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/799501

Verhoeven, Jef C. 1993. “An Interview With Erving Goffman, 1980.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3):317-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_5

Weinstein, Raymond. 1994. “Goffman’s Asylums and the Total Institution Model of Mental Hospitals.” Psychiatry 57:348-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1994.11024699

Williams, Robin. 1988. “Understanding Goffman’s Methods.” Pp. 64-88 in Erving Goff man: Exploring the Interaction Order, edited by P. Drew and A. Wooten. Boston: Northeastern University.