Rescuing the Error: A Methodological Note on the Use of Reflexivity in the Research Process

Sofia Alexandra Cruz; Bruno Monteiro

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.13.4.05

Authors

Sofia Alexandra Cruz University of Porto, Portugal
Bruno Monteiro University of Porto, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.13.4.05

Keywords:

Qualitative Methodology, Reflexivity, Error, Sociology of Work

Abstract

This article explores the opportunities of a research strategy that integrates both the observation of the object and the observation of the subject (researcher). In a research about shopping centers’ workers, the researchers tried to show how the methodological misfortunes experienced by them, sometimes seen as errors, supported the inquiry on the very experiences of workers. Moreover, such misfortunes enabled an increased awareness about the effects and limits of the conceptual and technical instruments then used. In fact, only the integration of reflexivity in the course of the research enabled further knowledge about workers’ social profiles and the temporal structures of their work activity. Thus, this article highlights the advantages that exist in evidencing and reflecting upon the methodological adversities as a preliminary step to their sociological exploration and shows how the theory is not something to be applied to others, but also that helps the researcher to keep his/her work under close scrutiny.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sofia Alexandra Cruz, University of Porto, Portugal

Sofia Alexandra Cruz is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Economics (University of Porto) and Researcher at the Institute of Sociology (University of Porto, Portugal). She works in the field of sociology of work, organizations, and professional groups. Her main research topics cover service work, managers, and social entrepreneurship.

Bruno Monteiro, University of Porto, Portugal

Bruno Monteiro is a Sociologist and, also, a Researcher at the Institute of Sociology (University of Porto).

References

Althusser, Louis. 1992. Filosofia e filosofia espontânea dos cientistas. Lisbon: Presença.
Google Scholar

Aubert, Nicole and Vincent Gaulejac. 1991. Le Côut de l’Excellence. Paris: Seuil.
Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston. 1960. Le rationalisme appliqué. Paris: PUF.
Google Scholar

Bettis, Pamela. 1996. “Urban Students, Liminality and the Postindustrial Context.” Sociology of Education 69(2):105-125.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2112801

Boltanski, Luc and Eve Chiapello. 1999. Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
Google Scholar

Bolton, Sharon. 2006. “Una tipologia de la emoción en el lugar de trabajo.” Sociologia del Trabajo 53:3-29.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. “L’inconscient d’école.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 135:3-5.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.2000.2696

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Science de la science et reflexivité. Paris: Éditions Raisons D’Agir.
Google Scholar

Bouveresse, Jacques. 1984. Rationalité et cynisme. Paris: Éditions du Minuit.
Google Scholar

Breuer, Franz. 2003. “Lo subjetivo del conocimiento socio-científico y su reflexión: ventanas epistemológicas y traducciones metodológicas.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 4(2): Art 25.
Google Scholar

Bunge, Mario. 1986. “Seven Desiderata for Rationality.” Pp. 5-15 in Rationality: The Critical View, edited by J. Agassi and I. Jarvie. New York: Kuwer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3491-7_1

Canguilhem, Georges. 1983. Études d`histoire et de philosophie des sciences. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Google Scholar

Canguilhem, Georges. 2000. Idéologie et rationalité dans l’histoire des sciences de la vie. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Google Scholar

Cruz, Sofia. 2010. O Trabalho nos Centros Comerciais. Porto: Afrontamento.
Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1974. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3129898

Dubar, Claude. 1997. A Socialização. Construção das Identidades Sociais e Profissionais. Porto: Porto Editora.
Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre. 1991. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. With a New Introduction by Jules Vuillemin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1990. L’évolution pédagogique en France. Paris: PUF.
Google Scholar

Emigh, Rebecca. 1997. “The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory.” Theory and Society 26(5):649-684.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006896217647

Gadrey, Jean. 2002. “Emploi, productivité et évaluation des performances dans les services.” Pp. 57-89 in L’Émergence du Modèle du Service: enjeux et réalités, edited by J. Gadrey and P. Zarafian. Paris: Éditions Liaisons.
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie. 2003. The Managed Heart: The Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520930414

Hodson, Randy. 2001. Dignity at Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499333

Koyré, Alexandre. 1986. De la mystique à la science. Paris: Éditions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno and Steven Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820412

Lecourt, Dominique. 1975. Marxism and Epistemology. Bachelard, Canguilhem, Foucault. Bristol: NLB.
Google Scholar

Leidner, Robin. 1993. Fast Food, Fast Talk. Service Work and the Routinization and Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Lüdtke, Alf. 1998. “La domination au quotidien. ‘Sens de soi’ et individualité des travailleurs en Allemagne avant et après 1933.” Politix 4(13):68-78.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/polix.1991.1439

Macdonald, Cameron and Carmen Sirianni. 1996. “The Service Society and the Changing Experience of Work.” Pp. 1-26 in Working in the Service Society, edited by C. Macdonald and C. Sirianni. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Macnaghten, Phil and Greg Myers. 2007. “Focus Groups.” Pp. 65-79 in Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C. Seale et al. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Michelle and Nicola Parker. 2012. “Unsatisfactory Saturation: A Critical Exploration of the Notion of Saturated Sample Sizes in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 13(2):190-197.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106

Ritzer, Georges. 1998. The McDonaldization Thesis: Explorations and Extensions. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279007

Salmon, Wesley. 2005. Reality and Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew. 2007. “What Dignity at Work Means.” Pp. 16-28 in Dimensions of Dignity at Work, edited by S. Bolton. London: Butterworth.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8333-3.50007-X

Sennett, Richard. 2003. Respect in a World of Inequality. London: W.W. Norton and Company.
Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. 2001. “A metrópole e a vida do espírito.” Pp. 31-43 in Cidade, Cultura e Globalização, edited by C. Fortuna. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
Google Scholar

Sklar, Lawrence. 2000. Theory and Truth. Philosophical Critique within Foundational Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Wolf, Eric. 1990. “Distinguished Lecture: Facing Power-Old Insights, New Questions.” American Anthropologist 3(92):586-596.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.3.02a00020