Rescuing the Error: A Methodological Note on the Use of Reflexivity in the Research Process

Sofia Alexandra Cruz; Bruno Monteiro

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.13.4.05

Authors

Sofia Alexandra Cruz University of Porto, Portugal
Bruno Monteiro University of Porto, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.13.4.05

Keywords:

Qualitative Methodology, Reflexivity, Error, Sociology of Work

Abstract

This article explores the opportunities of a research strategy that integrates both the observation of the object and the observation of the subject (researcher). In a research about shopping centers’ workers, the researchers tried to show how the methodological misfortunes experienced by them, sometimes seen as errors, supported the inquiry on the very experiences of workers. Moreover, such misfortunes enabled an increased awareness about the effects and limits of the conceptual and technical instruments then used. In fact, only the integration of reflexivity in the course of the research enabled further knowledge about workers’ social profiles and the temporal structures of their work activity. Thus, this article highlights the advantages that exist in evidencing and reflecting upon the methodological adversities as a preliminary step to their sociological exploration and shows how the theory is not something to be applied to others, but also that helps the researcher to keep his/her work under close scrutiny.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sofia Alexandra Cruz, University of Porto, Portugal

Sofia Alexandra Cruz is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Economics (University of Porto) and Researcher at the Institute of Sociology (University of Porto, Portugal). She works in the field of sociology of work, organizations, and professional groups. Her main research topics cover service work, managers, and social entrepreneurship.
Bruno Monteiro, University of Porto, Portugal

Bruno Monteiro is a Sociologist and, also, a Researcher at the Institute of Sociology (University of Porto).

References

Althusser, Louis. 1992. Filosofia e filosofia espontânea dos cientistas. Lisbon: Presença.

Aubert, Nicole and Vincent Gaulejac. 1991. Le Côut de l’Excellence. Paris: Seuil.

Bachelard, Gaston. 1960. Le rationalisme appliqué. Paris: PUF.

Bettis, Pamela. 1996. “Urban Students, Liminality and the Postindustrial Context.” Sociology of Education 69(2):105-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2112801

Boltanski, Luc and Eve Chiapello. 1999. Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.

Bolton, Sharon. 2006. “Una tipologia de la emoción en el lugar de trabajo.” Sociologia del Trabajo 53:3-29.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. “L’inconscient d’école.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 135:3-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.2000.2696

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Science de la science et reflexivité. Paris: Éditions Raisons D’Agir.

Bouveresse, Jacques. 1984. Rationalité et cynisme. Paris: Éditions du Minuit.

Breuer, Franz. 2003. “Lo subjetivo del conocimiento socio-científico y su reflexión: ventanas epistemológicas y traducciones metodológicas.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 4(2): Art 25.

Bunge, Mario. 1986. “Seven Desiderata for Rationality.” Pp. 5-15 in Rationality: The Critical View, edited by J. Agassi and I. Jarvie. New York: Kuwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3491-7_1

Canguilhem, Georges. 1983. Études d`histoire et de philosophie des sciences. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin.

Canguilhem, Georges. 2000. Idéologie et rationalité dans l’histoire des sciences de la vie. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin.

Cruz, Sofia. 2010. O Trabalho nos Centros Comerciais. Porto: Afrontamento.

Davidson, Donald. 1974. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3129898

Dubar, Claude. 1997. A Socialização. Construção das Identidades Sociais e Profissionais. Porto: Porto Editora.

Duhem, Pierre. 1991. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. With a New Introduction by Jules Vuillemin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Durkheim, Emile. 1990. L’évolution pédagogique en France. Paris: PUF.

Emigh, Rebecca. 1997. “The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory.” Theory and Society 26(5):649-684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006896217647

Gadrey, Jean. 2002. “Emploi, productivité et évaluation des performances dans les services.” Pp. 57-89 in L’Émergence du Modèle du Service: enjeux et réalités, edited by J. Gadrey and P. Zarafian. Paris: Éditions Liaisons.

Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.

Hochschild, Arlie. 2003. The Managed Heart: The Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520930414

Hodson, Randy. 2001. Dignity at Work. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499333

Koyré, Alexandre. 1986. De la mystique à la science. Paris: Éditions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.

Latour, Bruno and Steven Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820412

Lecourt, Dominique. 1975. Marxism and Epistemology. Bachelard, Canguilhem, Foucault. Bristol: NLB.

Leidner, Robin. 1993. Fast Food, Fast Talk. Service Work and the Routinization and Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lüdtke, Alf. 1998. “La domination au quotidien. ‘Sens de soi’ et individualité des travailleurs en Allemagne avant et après 1933.” Politix 4(13):68-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/polix.1991.1439

Macdonald, Cameron and Carmen Sirianni. 1996. “The Service Society and the Changing Experience of Work.” Pp. 1-26 in Working in the Service Society, edited by C. Macdonald and C. Sirianni. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Macnaghten, Phil and Greg Myers. 2007. “Focus Groups.” Pp. 65-79 in Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C. Seale et al. London: Sage.

O’Reilly, Michelle and Nicola Parker. 2012. “Unsatisfactory Saturation: A Critical Exploration of the Notion of Saturated Sample Sizes in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 13(2):190-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106

Ritzer, Georges. 1998. The McDonaldization Thesis: Explorations and Extensions. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279007

Salmon, Wesley. 2005. Reality and Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sayer, Andrew. 2007. “What Dignity at Work Means.” Pp. 16-28 in Dimensions of Dignity at Work, edited by S. Bolton. London: Butterworth. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8333-3.50007-X

Sennett, Richard. 2003. Respect in a World of Inequality. London: W.W. Norton and Company.

Simmel, Georg. 2001. “A metrópole e a vida do espírito.” Pp. 31-43 in Cidade, Cultura e Globalização, edited by C. Fortuna. Oeiras: Celta Editora.

Sklar, Lawrence. 2000. Theory and Truth. Philosophical Critique within Foundational Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wolf, Eric. 1990. “Distinguished Lecture: Facing Power-Old Insights, New Questions.” American Anthropologist 3(92):586-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.3.02a00020