Knowledge about our experience and distinguishing between possibilities

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.38.09

Słowa kluczowe:

Robert Stalnaker, externalism, contextualism, phenomenal experience, self-locating beliefs

Abstrakt

In my article I reconstruct the main threads of Robert Stalnaker’s book Our Knowledge of the Internal World, which focuses on the problem of our epistemic relation to our experience and the relation between experience and knowledge. First, the book proposes an interesting view of externalism, which combines classical externalist claims with a contextualist approach to content ascriptions. The approach accommodates some important internalist intuitions by showing how content ascriptions can be sensitive to the perspective from which a subject perceives the world. Second, Stalnaker proposes a theory of self-locating and phenomenal knowledge, which should be understood in terms of differentiating between real possibilities. The puzzling upshot of this elegant solution is that  it commits one to the existence of possibilities accessible only from the first-person perspective. Finally, Stalnaker presents an argument which shows that our knowledge about our phenomenal experience is no more direct than the knowledge about external objects. Stalnaker’s claim that by merely having an experience we don’t learn any new information seems, however, too strict in light of his contextualist approach to content ascriptions.

Bibliografia

Burge, T. (1979), “Individualism and the Mental”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73-121.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x

Elga, A. (2000), “Self-Locating Belief and the Sleeping Beauty Problem”, Analysis 60:143-147.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/60.2.143

Lewis, D. (1979), “Attitudes de dicto and de se”, Philosophical Review 88: 513-543.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2184843

Lewis, D. (1981), “What Puzzling Pierre Does not Believe”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59: 283-289.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408112340241

Lewis, D. (1988), “What Experience Teaches”, in Lewis, D. (1999) Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: CUP.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625343

Lewis, D. (1996), “Elusive Knowledge”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 594-567.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409612347521

Nida-Rümelin, M. (1995), “What Mary Couldn’t Know: Belief and Phenomenal States”, in Metzinger, T. (ed.), Conscious Experience, Exeter: Imprint Academic: 219-241.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Perry, J. (2001) Knowledge, Possibility and Consciousness, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4077.001.0001

Stalnaker, R. (2008) Our Knowledge of the External World, Oxford: OUP.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545995.001.0001

Opublikowane

2017-09-30

Jak cytować

Matuszkiewicz, M. (2017). Knowledge about our experience and distinguishing between possibilities. Hybris, 38(3), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.38.09